UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(A) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OFProxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.        )

 

Filed by the Registrantx

 

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant¨

 

Check the appropriate box:

x    Preliminary Proxy Statement

x

¨Confidential, For Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

¨    Definitive Proxy Statement

¨    Definitive Additional Materials

¨    Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12    Preliminary Proxy Statement

¨    Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
¨    Definitive Proxy Statement

¨    Definitive Additional Materials

¨    Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-12

 

CENDANT CORPORATIONAvis Budget Group, Inc.


(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 


(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

 

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

 

No fee required.

x    No fee required.

 

¨Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

¨    Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

 

 (1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 

 (2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 

 (3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set(set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

 

 (4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

 

 (5) Total fee paid:

 

 

 

¨Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

¨    Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

 

¨

¨Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

(1)Amount Previously Paid:

 

 (1) Amount Previously Paid:

 (2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3) Filing Party:

(4) Date Filed:

 

(3)Filing Party:


(4)Date Filed:



LOGO


LOGO

JulyApril     , 20062007

Dear Fellow Stockholder:

You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Cendant CorporationAvis Budget Group, Inc. (the “Company”), which will be held at the RamadaHilton Garden Inn Virginia Beach Town Center, 252 Town Center Drive, Virginia Beach, Virginia 23462 on May 21, 2007 at 1:00 p.m., Eastern Time.

With a long-time corporate presence in Virginia Beach, we are holding the Annual Meeting there to enable us to involve our numerous colleagues and Conference Center, 130 Route 10 West, East Hanover, New Jersey 07936 on August 29, 2006 at 10:00 a.m., New York time. We look forwardassociates from our Virginia Beach operations in this important corporate event and to greeting as many ofrecognize their contribution to our stockholders as possible.

This will be the Company’s first annual meeting following the announcement of the Company’s plan to separate into four separate companies – one for each of the Company’s Real Estate Services, Hospitality Services (including Timeshare Resorts), Travel Distribution Services and Vehicle Rental businesses (the “Separation Plan”). As of the date of this letter, the Board of Directors has approved the distributions to the Company’s stockholders of all the shares of common stock of Realogy Corporation, the Company’s subsidiary that holds the assets and liabilities of its Real Estate Services businesses, and Wyndham Worldwide Corporation, the Company’s subsidiary that holds the assets and liabilities of its Hospitality Services (including Timeshare Resorts) businesses. The distributions are expected to occur after the close of business on July 31, 2006. As part of the Separation Plan, the Company also entered into an agreement to sell Travelport, Inc., the Company’s subsidiary that holds the assets and liabilities of its Travel Distribution Services businesses, on June 30, 2006 to an affiliate of The Blackstone Group for $4.3 billion in cash. Upon closing of this sale, which is expected in August 2006, subject to customary closing conditions, the Separation Plan will have been completed. If the sale of Travelport is not completed prior to December 31, 2006, the Company will distribute all of the shares of common stock of Travelport to stockholders and the completion of this distribution will mark the completion of the Separation Plan. Upon completion of the Separation Plan, the Company will be comprised principally of its current vehicle rental operations of the Avis and Budget brands and, upon stockholder approval, the Company will change its name to Avis Budget Group, Inc.success.

This booklet includes the Notice of Annual Meeting and the Proxy Statement. The Proxy Statement describes the business to be conducted at the Annual Meeting and provides other information concerning the Company of which you should be aware when you vote your shares.

Admission to the Annual Meeting will be by ticket only. If you are a registered stockholder planning to attend the meeting, please check the appropriate box on the proxy card and retain the bottom portion of the card as your admission ticket. If your shares are held through an intermediary, such as a bank or broker, please follow the instructions under the Additional Information section of the Proxy Statement to obtain a ticket.

If you are unable to attend the Annual Meeting in person, you may listen to the proceedings through the Internet. To listen to the live webcast, please log on atwww.cendant.comwww.avisbudgetgroup.comand select “News Releases“Webcasts and Webcasts”Presentations” in the “Investor Center”Relations” section of the website. The webcast will begin at 10:1:00 a.m, New York time,p.m, Eastern Time, and will remain on the Company’s website for one year. The webcast will permit stockholders to listen to the Annual Meeting but will not provide for the ability to vote or present any stockholder proposals.vote.

Whether or not you attend the Annual Meeting, it is important that your shares be represented and voted at the meeting. As a stockholder of record, you can vote your shares by telephone, electronically via the Internet or by marking your votes on the enclosed proxy card. If you vote on the enclosed proxy card, you must sign, date and mail the proxy card in the enclosed envelope. If you decide to attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person, you may then withdraw your proxy.

On behalf of the Board of Directors and the employees of Cendant Corporation,Avis Budget Group, Inc., I would like to express my appreciation for your continued interest in the affairs of the Company.

Sincerely,

Henry R. SilvermanLOGO

Ronald L. Nelson

Chairman of the Board and

Chief Executive Officer


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

   Page

NOTICE OF 20062007 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

  1

PROXY STATEMENT

  21

THECENDANT SEPARATION PLAN

  21

ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING

  31

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

  85

General

8

Biographical Information for Nominees

8

Functions and Meetings of the Board of Directors

12

Statement on Corporate Governance

12

Board Meetings

13

Committees of the Board

13

Audit Committee

13

Compensation Committee

14

Corporate Governance Committee

14

Policy Committee

15

Separation Committee

15

Executive Committee

15

Director Compensation

16

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

  1810

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

  2212

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND OTHER INFORMATION

  2614

Summary Compensation TableSECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS

  2640

Aggregated Option Exercises in 2005 and Year-End Option Values

29

Employment Contracts and Termination, Severance and Change of Control Arrangements

29

Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation

38

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

41

Performance GraphREPORT OF AUDIT COMMITTEE

  42

Report of Audit Committee

43

PROPOSALS TO BE VOTED ON AT MEETING

  4443

Proposal No. 1: Election of Directors [Proposal

43

Proposal No. 1]2: Ratification of Appointment of Auditors

  44

Ratification of Appointment of Auditors [ProposalProposal No. 2]3: Proposal to Approve the Avis Budget Group, Inc. 2007 Equity and Incentive Plan

  4546

Reverse Stock Split Proposal [Proposal No. 3]

47

Proposal to Change the Name of the Company [Proposal No. 4]

48

Redesignation of Common Stock Proposal [Proposal No. 5]

49

Decrease of Authorized Shares Proposal [Proposal No. 6]

50

Stockholder Proposal [Proposal No. 7]

51

Stockholder Proposal [Proposal No. 8]

53

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

  5550

CENDANT SEPARATION AGREEMENTS

51

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

  6056

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR 20072008 ANNUAL MEETING

  6056

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

  6157

ANNEX A: CENDANT CORPORATION DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE CRITERIAA

  A-1

ANNEX B: AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTERB

  B-1

ANNEX C: PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO CENDANT’S CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

C-1

 

i


NOTICE OF 20062007 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON

AUGUST 29, 2006May 21, 2007

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Cendant CorporationAvis Budget Group, Inc. (the “Company”) will be held on August 29, 2006May 21, 2007 at 10:1:00 a.m.p.m., New York time,Eastern Time, at the RamadaHilton Garden Inn and ConferenceVirginia Beach Town Center, 130 Route 10 West, East Hanover, New Jersey 07936252 Town Center Drive, Virginia Beach, Virginia 23462 (the “Meeting”), to consider and vote upon the following matters:

1. (A) If the Separation Plan (as defined in the enclosed Proxy Statement) has not yet been completed prior to or aselection of the date of the Meeting, to elect sixteeneight directors for a one-year term expiring in 2007 or until their successors are duly elected and qualified, or (B) if the Separation Plan has been completed prior to or as of the date of the Meeting, to elect six directors for a one-year term expiring in 20072008 or until their successors are duly elected and qualified;

2. To ratifyratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the auditors of the Company’s financial statements for fiscal year 2006;2007;

3. To considerconsideration and approve the Company’s proposal to amend its amended and restated certificate of incorporation (“Certificate of Incorporation”) to effect a one-for-ten reverse stock split of its common stock;

4. To consider and approve the Company’s proposal to amend its Certificate of Incorporation to change the nameapproval of the Company to “AvisAvis Budget Group, Inc.”;

5. To consider 2007 Equity and approve the Company’s proposal to amend its Certificate of Incorporation to redesignate the Company’s series of common stock presently designated as “Cendant Corporation-CD Common Stock” to “Common Stock” and to remove references to the series of common stock defined as “Move.com Stock”;

6. To consider and approve the Company’s proposal to amend its Certificate of Incorporation to decrease the number of authorized shares of the Company’s common stock to 250 million shares;

7. To consider and vote upon two stockholder proposals;Incentive Plan; and

8. To transact4. transaction of such other business as may properly come before the Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on July 20, 2006April 3, 2007 as the record date for the Meeting. Only stockholders of record at that time are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof. A list of stockholders entitled to vote at the Meeting will be available for examination by any stockholder, for any purpose germane to the Meeting, at the Meeting and for ten days prior to the Meeting during ordinary business hours at One Campus Drive,Six Sylvan Way, Parsippany, New Jersey, 07054, the Company’s principal place of business.

By Order of the Board of Directors

ERIC J. BOCKLOGO

JEAN M. SERA

Secretary

Dated: JulyApril     , 20062007


CENDANT CORPORATIONAVIS BUDGET GROUP, INC.

9 West 57th Street6 Sylvan Way

Parsippany, New York, New York 10019Jersey 07054

 


PROXY STATEMENT

 


Annual Meeting of Stockholders to

be held on Tuesday, August 29, 2006Monday, May 21, 2007

CENDANT SEPARATION PLAN

On OctoberAugust 23, 2005, the Board of Directors of2006, Cendant Corporation, as we were formerly known, completed the separation (the “Company”“Cendant Separation”) preliminarily approved a plan to separate the Company into four separate companies—companies, one for each of the Company’sits former Real Estate Services businesses (Realogy Corporation), its former Hospitality Services (including Timeshare Resorts) businesses (Wyndham Worldwide Corporation), its former Travel Distribution Services businesses (Travelport) and its Vehicle Rental businesses.businesses (Cendant, now Avis Budget Group). The separation was to occureffected through distributions to the Company’s stockholders of all of the shares of common stock of three subsidiaries of the Company that would hold the assets and liabilities of the businesses other than the Vehicle Rental business, which was to remain after the distributions. Following each distribution, the Company’s stockholders were expected to own 100% of the common stock of the subsidiary being distributed. On July 13, 2006, the Board of Directors approved thepro rata distributions to the Company’s stockholders of all of the shares of common stock of Realogy Corporation the Company’s subsidiary that holds the assets and liabilities of the Company’s Real Estate Services businesses, and Wyndham Worldwide Corporation the Company’s subsidiary that holds the assets and liabilities of the Company’s Hospitality Services (including Timeshare Resorts) businesses. The distributions are expected to occur after the close of business on July 31, 2006. The third and final distribution was expected to be of Travelport Inc., the Company’s subsidiary that holds the assets and liabilities of the Company’s Travel Distribution Services businesses. On April 24, 2006, the Company announced that as an alternative to distributing shares of Travelport to the Company’s stockholders, the Company was also exploring the sale of Travelport. On June 30, 2006, the Company entered into an agreement to sell Travelport to an affiliate of The Blackstone Group for $4.3 billion in cash. The Company expects the sale of Travelport to close in August 2006, subject to the satisfaction and/or waiver of certain conditions contained in the Travelport purchase agreement.

The Company cannot provide any assurance that the sale of Travelport will be completed as it is subject to certain conditions precedent, some of which are beyond the Company’s control. The Company will be required to distribute the shares of common stock of Travelport to the Company’s stockholders as originally planned if the sale of Travelport has not been completed by December 31, 2006. In addition, the Company cannot provide any assurance that the Realogy and Wyndham Worldwide distributions will be completed as they are subject to certain conditions precedent.

In connection with the Separation Plan and following bothFollowing completion of the Realogy and Wyndham Worldwide distributions and the approval of its stockholders, the Company will changeCendant Separation, Cendant changed its name to Avis Budget Group, Inc. and expects that at such time itsour common stock will beginbegan to trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “CAR”.

Throughout this Proxy Statement, reference is made to“CAR.” With the Company’s current principal executive office as 9 West 57th Street, New York, New York 10019. Following completion of the Cendant Separation, Plan,Avis Budget Group’s operations consist of two of the Company’s principal executive office will become 6 Sylvan Way, Parsippany, New Jersey 07054. Reference is also made tomost recognized brands in the Company’s website address as www.cendant.com. If the name change proposal becomes effective, the Company’s new website address will be www.avisbudgetgroup.com. Finally, reference is also made to an email address for the Company’s Presiding Director aspresidingdirector@cendant.com.If the name change proposal becomes effective, this email address will be changed topresidingdirector@avisbudget.com. The Company will take appropriate measures to ensure that mail (both regular and electronic) is forwarded accordingly.global vehicle rental industry.

ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING

Who is soliciting my vote?

The Board of Directors of the Company is soliciting your vote at the 20062007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and any adjournment or postponement thereof (the “Meeting”), to be held on the date, at the time and place, and for the purposes set forth in the foregoing notice. This Proxy Statement, the accompanying notice and the enclosed proxy card are first being mailed to stockholders on or about July 28, 2006.April     , 2007.

What will I be voting on?

 

Election of Directors (see page 44)43);

 

Ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s auditors for 20062007 (see page pages 44–45); and

 

Approval of the proposal to amend the Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation (“Certificate of Incorporation”) to effect a one-for-ten reverse stock split of the Company’s common stock (see page 47);

Approval of the proposal to amend the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation to change the name of the Company to “AvisAvis Budget Group, Inc.” (see page 48);

Approval of the proposal to amend the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation to redesignate the Company’s series of common stock presently designated as “Cendant Corporation-CD Common Stock” to “Common Stock” 2007 Equity and to remove references to the series of common stock defined as “Move.com Stock” (see page 49);

Approval of the proposal to amend the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation to decrease the number of authorized shares of the Company’s common stock to 250 million shares (see page 50); and

Two stockholder proposalsIncentive Plan (see pages 51 and 53)46–49).

How many votes do I have?

You will have one vote for every share of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”), you owned as of the close of business on July 20, 2006April 3, 2007 (the “Record Date”).

How many votes can be cast by all stockholders?

                        , consisting of one vote for each of the Company’s shares of Common Stock that were outstanding on the Record Date. There is no cumulative voting, and the holders of the Common Stock vote together as a single class.

How many votes must be present to hold the Meeting?

One-third of the outstanding shares of Common Stock entitled to vote at the Meeting, or          votes, must be present, in person or by proxy, to constitute a quorum at the Meeting. Stockholders of record who are present

at the Meeting, in person or by proxy, and who abstain from voting, including brokers holding customers’ shares of record who do notenot vote on particular proposals because the brokers do not have discretion to vote and have not received instructions from their customers as to how to vote, will be included in the number of stockholders present at the Meeting for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present for the transaction of business at the Meeting.

How many votes are required to elect directors and adopt the other proposals?

 

Directors are elected by the affirmative vote of a plurality of the shares of Common Stock present at the Meeting, in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote in the election of Directors. Under applicable Delaware law, in determining whether such nominees have received the requisite number of affirmative votes, abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote.

Delaware law, in determining whether such nominees have received the requisite number of affirmative votes, abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote.

 

Approval of the proposal relating to the ratification of the appointment of auditors of the Company’s financial statements and each of the stockholder proposals requirerequires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock present, in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote on the proposals.proposal. Under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, brokers who hold shares in street name will have discretion, on behalf of their clients that hold shares as of the record date, to vote on the proposal relating to the ratification of the appointment of auditors when the brokers do not receive instructions from beneficial owners. The brokers, however, will not have discretion to vote on the stockholder proposals when the brokers do not receive instructions from beneficial owners. Under applicable Delaware law, in determining whether such proposals haveproposal has received the requisite number of affirmative votes, abstentions will be counted and will have the same effect as a vote against eachsuch proposal and broker non-votes (if any) will have no effect on the vote on these proposals.this proposal.

 

Approval of the proposals amendingproposal relating to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation requireAvis Budget Group, Inc. 2007 Equity and Incentive Plan requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock present, in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote on the amendments.proposal; provided, that the total vote cast on this proposal represents a majority in interest of all securities entitled to vote on this proposal. Under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, brokers who hold shares in street name will not have discretion on behalf of their clients that hold shares as of the record date, to vote on these proposalsthe proposal to approve the Avis Budget Group, Inc. 2007 Equity and Incentive Plan when the brokers do not receive instructions from beneficial owners. Under applicable Delaware law, in determining whether such proposals haveproposal has received the requisite number of affirmative votes, abstentions and broker non-votes (if any) will be counted and will have the same effect as a vote against such proposal and broker non-votes (if any) will have no effect on the amendments.vote on this proposal.

A “broker non-vote” occurs when a broker does not have discretion to vote on a particular proposal (i.e., the proposal is not considered “routine”) and the broker has not received instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares as to how to vote on such proposal. Generally, brokers have discretion to vote on proposals relating to what are deemed to be “routine” matters, which include the ratification of auditors, and the amendments to the Certificate of Incorporation described in this Proxy Statement, and do not have discretion to vote on proposals relating to what are deemed to be “non-routine” matters, which include stockholder proposals opposed by management.the proposal to approve the Avis Budget Group, Inc. 2007 Equity and Incentive Plan. A broker non-vote with respect to a particular proposal will not be considered as present and entitled to vote with respect to that proposal.

How do I vote?

You can vote by valid proxy received by telephone, via the Internet or by mail. If voting by mail, you must:

 

indicate your instructions on the proxy;

 

date and sign the proxy;

 

mail the proxy promptly in the enclosed envelope; and

 

allow sufficient time for the proxy to be received before the date of the Meeting.

Alternatively, in lieu of returning signed proxy cards, the Company’s stockholders of record can vote their shares by telephone or via the Internet. If you are a registered stockholder (that is, if you hold your stock in

certificate form), you may vote by telephone or electronically through the Internet by following the instructions included with your proxy card. If your shares are held in “street name” such as in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, please check your proxy card or contact your broker or nominee to determine whether you will be able to vote by telephone or electronically through the Internet. The deadline for voting by telephone or electronically through the Internet is 4:0011:59 p.m., New York time,Eastern Time, on the business day prior to the date of the Meeting.

Can I change my vote?

Yes. A proxy may be revoked at any time prior to the voting at the Meeting by submitting a later dated proxy (including a proxy by telephone or electronically through the Internet), by giving timely written notice of such revocation to the Secretary of the Company or by attending the Meeting and voting in person. However, if you hold shares in “street name,” you may not vote these shares in person at the Meeting unless you bring with you a legal proxy from the stockholder of record.

What if I do not vote for some of the matters listed on my proxy card?

Shares of Common Stock represented by proxies received by the Company (whether through the return of the enclosed proxy card, by telephone or through the Internet), where the stockholder has specified his or her choice with respect to the proposals described in this Proxy Statement (including the election of Directors), will be voted in accordance with the specification(s) so made.

If your proxy is properly executed but does not contain voting instructions, or if you vote by telephone or via the Internet without indicating how you want to vote, your shares will be voted:

 

“FOR” (A) If the Separation Plan has not yet been completed prior to or as of the date of the Meeting, the election of all sixteeneight nominees for the Board of Directors; or (B) if the Separation Plan has been completed prior to or as of the date of the Meeting, the election of all six post-Separation Plan nominees for the Board of Directors;

 

“FOR” the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as auditors of the Company’s financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2006;2007; and

 

“FOR” the proposal to amend the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation to effect a one-for-ten reverse stock splitapproval of the Company’s common stock;

“FOR” the proposal to amend the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation to change the name of the Company to “AvisAvis Budget Group, Inc.”;

“FOR” the proposal to amend the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation to redesignate the Company’s series of common stock presently designated as “Cendant Corporation-CD Common Stock” to “Common Stock” 2007 Equity and to remove references to the series of common stock defined as “Move.com Stock”;

Incentive Plan.

“FOR” the proposal to amend the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation to decrease the number of authorized shares of the Company’s common stock to 250 million shares; and

“AGAINST” the two stockholder proposals.

How do participants in savings plans vote?

For participants in the Cendant CorporationAvis Budget Group Employee Savings Plan, the Avis Voluntary Investment Savings Plan, the Avis Voluntary Investment Savings Plan for Bargaining Hourly Employees and the CendantAB Car Rental Operations,Services, Inc. Retirement Savings Plan (collectively, the “Savings Plans”), with shares of Common Stock credited to their accounts, voting instructions for the trustees of the Savings Plans are also being solicited through this Proxy Statement. In accordance with the provisions of the Savings Plans, the respective trustees will vote shares of Common Stock in accordance with instructions received from the participants to whose accounts such shares are credited. To the extent such instructions are not received prior to noon, New York time,Eastern Time, on August 23,

2006,May     , 2007, the trustees of the Savings Plans will vote the shares with respect to which it has not received instructions proportionately in accordance with the shares for which it has received instructions. Instructions given with respect to shares in accounts of the Savings Plans may be changed or revoked only in writing, and no such instructions may be revoked after noon, New York time,Eastern Time, on August 23, 2006.May     , 2007. Participants in the Savings Plans are not entitled to vote in person at the Meeting. If a participant in any of the Savings Plans has shares of Common Stock credited to his or her account and also owns other shares of Common Stock, he or she should receive separate proxy cards for shares credited to his or her account in the Savings Plans and any other shares that he or she owns. All such proxy cards should be completed, signed and returned to the transfer agent to register voting instructions for all shares owned by him or her or held for his or her benefit in the Savings Plans.

Could other matters be decided at the Meeting?

The Board of Directors does not intend to bring any matter before the Meeting other than those set forth above, and the Board is not aware of any matters that anyone else proposes to present for action at the Meeting.

However, if any other matters properly come before the Meeting, the persons named in the enclosed proxy, or their duly constituted substitutes acting at the Meeting, will be authorized to vote or otherwise act thereon in accordance with their judgment on such matters.

Do I need a ticket to attend the Meeting?

Yes. Attendance at the Meeting will be limited to stockholders as of the Record Date, their authorized representatives and guests of the Company. Admission will be by ticket only. For registered stockholders, the bottom portion of the proxy card enclosed with the Proxy Statement is the Meeting ticket. Beneficial owners with shares held through an intermediary, such as a bank or broker, should request tickets in writing from Investor Relationsthe Secretary at Cendant Corporation, 9 West 57th Street,Avis Budget Group, Inc., 6 Sylvan Way, Parsippany, New York, New York 10019,Jersey 07054, and include proof of ownership, such as a bank or brokerage firm account statement or letter from the broker, trustee, bank or nominee holding their stock, confirming beneficial ownership. Stockholders who do not obtain tickets in advance may obtain them on the Meeting date at the registration desk upon verifying his or her stock ownership as of the Record Date. In accordance with the Company’s security procedures, all persons attending the Meeting must present a picture identification along with their admission ticket or proof of beneficial ownership in order to gain admission. Admission to the Meeting will be expedited if tickets are obtained in advance. Tickets may be issued to others at the discretion of the Company.

How can I access the Company’s proxy materials and annual report electronically?

A copy of the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for its latest fiscal year is available without charge to stockholders at the Company’s website atwww.cendant.comwww.avisbudgetgroup.comor upon written request to Cendant Corporation, 9 West 57th Street,Avis Budget Group, Inc., 6 Sylvan Way, Parsippany, New York, New York 10019,Jersey 07054, Attention: Investor Relations.You can elect to receive future annual reports and proxy statements electronically by marking the appropriate box on your proxy card or by following the instructions provided if you vote via the Internet or by telephone.

NO PERSON IS AUTHORIZED TO GIVE ANY INFORMATION OR TO MAKE ANY REPRESENTATION OTHER THAN THOSE CONTAINED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT, AND, IF GIVEN OR MADE, SUCH INFORMATION MUST NOT BE RELIED UPON AS HAVING BEEN AUTHORIZED AND THE DELIVERY OF THIS PROXY STATEMENT SHALL, UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES, CREATE ANY IMPLICATION THAT THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN THE AFFAIRS OF THE COMPANY SINCE THE DATE OF THIS PROXY STATEMENT.

When does the Company expect to effect the reverse stock split, name change, redesignation and/or decrease of authorized shares proposals, if approved?

If the reverse stock split, name change, redesignation and/or decrease of authorized shares proposals are approved, the Company intends to amend its Certificate of Incorporation soon after the Meeting to effect the approved proposals. The Company will not effect the proposals, however, unless and until the Realogy and Wyndham Worldwide distributions have been completed. In addition, the Company will not effect the decrease in the number of authorized shares of its common stock unless and until the reverse stock split has been approved by stockholders and completed.

Do I need to do anything with my certificates for the Company’s common stock in connection with the reverse stock split and the redesignation of the Company’s common stock?

If the reverse stock split and/or redesignation proposals are approved, the Company will then mail to each holder of Common Stock in certificated form a Letter of Transmittal with instructions that explain how stockholders can receive uncertificated shares of Common Stock to which they are entitled following the reverse stock split and/or redesignation of the Company’s common stock. Holders of Common Stock in certificated form will be asked to deliver their certificates representing shares of Common Stock, along with a properly executed Letter of Transmittal and any other required documents, to the exchange agent identified in the Letter of Transmittal. The certificates will be canceled and each holder will receive the number of full shares of reclassified Common Stock to which each holder is entitled, after giving effect to the one-for-ten reverse stock split and the redesignation, if approved at the Meeting, subject to receipt of cash in lieu of fractional shares. Unexchanged certificates will represent the number of full shares of reclassified Common Stock to which such holders are entitled, after giving effect to the one-for-ten reverse stock split and the redesignation, if approved at the Meeting. Holders of unexchanged certificates will not be entitled to receive any dividends or other distributions, including cash in lieu of fractional shares, payable by the Company after the the reverse stock split is effective, until the certificates have been surrendered together with a duly completed and executed Letter of Transmittal. Such dividends and distributions, if any, will be accumulated, and at the time of surrender of the certificates together with a duly completed and executed Letter of Transmittal, all such unpaid dividends or distributions will be paid without interest.

Following the reverse stock split or the redesignation, reclassified Common Stock will only be issued electronically by way of direct registration, or in “uncertificated” form, which will eliminate the physical handling and safekeeping responsibilities inherent in owning transferable stock certificates and the need to return a duly executed stock certificate with a Letter of Transmittal to effect a transfer. Shares of Common Stock will no longer be issued in certificated form. Mellon Investor Services LLC will act as the registrar and transfer agent for the Common Stock both before and after the completion of the Separation Plan, the reverse stock split and redesignation. After completion of the reverse stock split and redesignation, stockholders will be able to transfer shares of Common Stock by making a request in writing to Mellon Investor Services.

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

General

The Board of Directors presently consists of sixteeneight members. Directors serve for a term of one-year expiring at the 20072008 annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are duly elected and qualified. The name and age of each present Director and his or her position with the Company are set forth below.

 

Name of Present Directors

  Age  

Present Position

Henry R. Silverman

65Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Director

Myra J. Biblowit

58Director

James E. Buckman

61Vice Chairman, General Counsel and Director

Leonard S. Coleman

58Presiding Director

Martin L. Edelman

65Director

George Herrera

49Director

Stephen P. Holmes

49Vice Chairman; Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Travel Content Division and Director

Louise T. Blouin MacBain

47Director

Cheryl D. Mills

41Director

The Right Honourable Brian Mulroney

67Director

Robert E. Nederlander

73Director; Chairman of the Corporate Governance Committee

Ronald L. Nelson

54President and Chief Financial Officer; Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Vehicle Rental and Director

Robert W. Pittman

52Director

Pauline D.E. Richards

58Director; Chairman of the Audit Committee

Sheli Z. Rosenberg

64Director

Robert F. Smith

73Director; Chairman of the Compensation Committee

Set forth below are the name and age of each person who will serve as a Director following completion of the Separation Plan.

Name of Post-Separation Plan Directors

Age

Post-Separation Position

Ronald L. Nelson

  54  Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Director

Mary C. Choksi

56Director

Leonard S. Coleman

  58  Presiding Director; Chairman of the Corporate Governance Committee

Martin L. Edelman

  65  Director

Lynn Krominga

56Director

Sheli Z. Rosenberg

  6465  Director; Chairman of the Compensation Committee

F. Robert Salerno

  55  President, Chief Operating Officer and Director

Stender E. Sweeney

  6768  Director; Chairman of the Audit Committee

Biographical Information for Nominees

At the Meeting, (A) if the Separation Plan has not been completed prior to or as of the date of the Meeting, the stockholders will vote on the election of each of the Company’s present Directors to serve as Directors for a one-year term ending at the 2007 annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are duly elected and qualified; however, upon completion of the Separation Plan, Messrs. Silverman, Buckman, Herrera, Holmes, Mulroney, Nederlander, Pittman and Smith and Mses. Biblowit, MacBain, Mills and Richards are expected to resign and the Board is expected to reduce the number of Directors in accordance with the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation and by-laws to six and to elect Messrs. Salerno and Sweeney to serve for the remainder of the terms of the directors they are replacing or (B) if the Separation Plan has been completed prior to or as of the date

of the Meeting, the stockholders will vote on the election of each of Messrs. Nelson, Coleman, Edelman, Salerno and Sweeney and Ms. Rosenberg, for a one-year term ending at the 2007 annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are duly elected and qualified. Certain additional information regarding each of the foregoing nominees, as of July 20, 2006, is set forth below.

Mr. SilvermanNelsonhas been Chief Executive Officer and a Director of the Company since December 1997, as well as Chairman of the Board of Directors and the Executive Committee since July 1998. Mr. Silverman was President of the Company from December 1997 until October 2004. Mr. Silverman was Chairman of the Board, Chairman of the Executive Committee and Chief Executive Officer of HFS Incorporated (“HFS”) from May 1990 until December 1997. Mr. Silverman will cease to serve as a Director of the Company upon the completion of the Separation Plan and Mr. Silverman will serve as Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director of Realogy at the time of the Realogy distribution. Mr. Silverman will cease to serve as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company upon the earlier of (i) completionsince August 2006 and Director since April 2003. Mr. Nelson was Chief Financial Officer from May 2003 until August 2006 and President from October 2004 to August 2006. Mr. Nelson was also Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Separation Plan or (ii)Company’s Vehicle Rental business from January 2006 to August 2006. From December 31, 2006.2005 to April 2006, Mr. Nelson was Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company’s Travel Distribution Division. From April 2003 to May 2003, Mr. Nelson was Senior Executive Vice President, Finance. From November 1994 until March 2003, Mr. Nelson was Co-Chief Operating Officer of DreamWorks SKG. Prior thereto, he was Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and a Director at Paramount Communications, Inc., formerly Gulf & Western Industries, Inc.

Ms. BiblowitChoksihas been a Director since April 2000. Since April 2001,March 2007. Ms. BiblowitChoksi has been President of The Breast Cancer Research Foundation. From July 1997 until March 2001, she served as Vice Dean for External Affairs for the New York University School of Medicine and Senior Vice President of the Mount Sinai-NYU Health System. From June 1991 to June 1997, Ms. Biblowit was Senior Vice President and ExecutiveManaging Director of the Capital Campaign for the American Museum of Natural History. Ms. Biblowit will cease to serve as a Director of the Company upon the completion of the Separation PlanStrategic Investment Partners, Inc. and will serve as a Director of Wyndham Worldwide at the time of the Wyndham Worldwide distribution.

Mr. Buckmanhas been a Vice ChairmanEmerging Markets Investors Corporation (investment management firms) since November 1998 and General Counsel and a Director of the Company since December 1997. Mr. Buckman was a Senior Executive Vice President of the Company from December 1997 until November 1998. Mr. Buckman was Senior Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Assistant Secretary of HFS from May 1997 to December 1997, a Director of HFS from June 1994 to December 1997 and Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Assistant Secretary of HFS from February 1992 to May 1997. Mr. Buckman will cease to serve as Vice Chairman and a Director of the Company following the completion of the Separation Plan and will serve as a Director of Wyndham Worldwide at the time of the Wyndham Worldwide distribution. Mr. Buckman will cease to serve as the General Counsel of the Company upon the earlier of (i) completion of the Separation Plan or (ii) December 31, 2006.1987.

Mr. Colemanhas been a Director since December 1997, and Presiding Director at executive sessions of the Board since February 2003.2003 and Chairman of the Governance Committee since August 2006. Mr. Coleman was a Director of HFS Incorporated (“HFS”) from April 1997 until December 1997. From 1999 to December 2005, Mr. Coleman was a Senior Advisor to Major League Baseball. Mr. Coleman was President of The National League of Professional Baseball Clubs from 1994 to 1999, having previously served since 1992 as Executive Director, Market Development of Major League Baseball. Mr. Coleman is a Director of the following corporations which file reports pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”): Omnicom Group Inc., H.J. Heinz Company, Aramark Corporation, Churchill Downs Inc. and Electronic Arts Inc. Mr. Coleman will continue to serve as a Director of the Company following the completion of the Separation Plan and will become Chairman of the Corporate Governance Committee.

Mr. Edelmanhas been a Director since December 1997 and was a Director of HFS from November 1993 until December 1997. Mr. Edelman has been Of Counsel to Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, LLP, a New York City law firm, since June 2000. Mr. Edelman was a partner with Battle Fowler, which merged with Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, from 1972 through 1993 and was Of Counsel to Battle Fowler from 1994 until June 2000. Mr. Edelman also serves as a Director of the following corporations that file reports pursuant to the Exchange Act: Capital Trust, and Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. and Realogy Corporation. See “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.” Mr. Edelman will continue to serve as a Director of the Company following the completion of the Separation Plan and will serve as a Director of Realogy at the time of the Realogy distribution.

Mr. HerreraMs. Kromingahas been a Director since January 2004. Since December 2003, Mr. Herrera has served as PresidentOctober 2006. Ms. Krominga is an attorney and Chief Executive Officer of Herrera-Cristina Group, Ltd., a Hispanic-owned multidisciplinary management firm. From August 1998 to January 2004, Mr. Herrera served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the United States Hispanic Chamber of Commerce. Mr. Herrera served as President of David J. Burgos & Associates, Inc. from December 1979 until July 1998. Mr. Herrera will cease to serve as a Director of the Company following the completion of the Separation Plan and will serve as a Director of Wyndham Worldwide at the time of the Wyndham Worldwide distribution.

Mr. Holmesbusiness executive. Most recently, since 1999, Ms. Krominga has been a Vice ChairmanConsultant to private equity and Director of the Companyventure capital firms and Chairmanto start-up and Chief Executive Officer of the Company’s Travel Content Division since December 1997. Mr. Holmes was Vice Chairman of HFS from September 1996 until December 1997 and was a Director of HFS from June 1994 until December 1997.early stage technology companies. From July 1990 through September 1996, Mr. Holmes served as Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of HFS. Mr. Holmes will cease to serve as a Director of the Company following the completion of the Separation Plan and Mr. Holmes will serve as the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director of Wyndham Worldwide at the time of the Wyndham Worldwide distribution.

Ms. MacBainhas been a Director since July 2005. Ms. MacBain has been the Chairman of The LTB Group, which includes LTB Holding Ltd., an art magazine publisher and art information provider, since March 2003. From February 2002 to December 2002, Ms. MacBain was Chief Executive Officer of Phillips, de Pury & Luxembourg, an auction house. From October 2000 to February 2002, Ms. MacBain served as a supervisory board member to, and from October 1987 to October 2000, Ms. MacBain was Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer of, Trader Classified Media, a Netherlands-based buyer and seller of classified ads. Ms. MacBain also holds a number of memberships in international business and art organizations. Ms. MacBain will cease to serve as a Director of the Company following the completion of the Separation Plan.

Ms. Millshas been a Director since June 2000. Ms. Mills has been Senior Vice President and Counselor for Operations and Administration for New York University since May 2002. In February 2006, Ms. Mills also assumed the role of General Counsel for New York University. From October 1999 to November 2001, Ms. Mills was Senior Vice President for Corporate Policy and Public Programming of Oxygen Media, Inc. From 19971981 to 1999, Ms. MillsKrominga held various senior executive and legal offices at Revlon, including President, Licensing Division from 1992 until 1998. Prior to that, Ms. Krominga was Deputy Counsel to the former President of the United States, William J. Clinton. From 1993 to 1996, Ms. Mills also served as Associate Counsel to the President. Ms. Mills will cease to serve as a Director of the Company following the completion of the Separation Planan attorney at American Express and will serve as a Director of Realogy at the time of the Realogy distribution.

Mr. Mulroneyhas been a Director since December 1997 and was a Director of HFS from April 1997 until December 1997. Mr. Mulroney was Prime Minister of Canada from 1984 to 1993 and is currently Senior Partner in the Montreal-based law firm, Ogilvy Renault. Mr. Mulroney is a Director of the following corporations which file reports pursuant to the Exchange Act: Archer Daniels Midland Company Inc., Barrick Gold Corporation, Trizec Properties Inc. and Quebecor, Inc. (including its subsidiary, Quebecor World Inc.). See “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions”. Mr. Mulroney will cease to serve as a Director of the Company following the completion of the Separation Plan and will serve as a Director of Wyndham Worldwide at the time of the Wyndham Worldwide distribution.

Mr. Nederlanderhas been a Director since December 1997 and Chairman of the Corporate Governance Committee since October 2002. Mr. Nederlander was a Director of HFS from July 1995 until December 1997. Mr. Nederlander has been President and/or Director since November 1981 of the Nederlander Organization, Inc., owner and operator of legitimate theaters in the City of New York. Since December 1998, Mr. Nederlander has been a managing partner of the Nederlander Company, LLC, operator of legitimate theaters outside the City of New York. Mr. Nederlander was Chairman of the Board of Riddell Sports, Inc. (now known as Varsity Brands, Inc.) from April 1988 to September 2003. He has been a limited partner and a Director of the New York Yankees since 1973. Mr. Nederlander has been President of Nederlander Television and Film Productions, Inc. since October 1985 and was Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Mego Financial Corp. from January 1988 to January 2002. Mr. Nederlander is currently a Director of Allis-Chalmers Corp., which filesCleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton.

reports pursuant to the Exchange Act. Mr. Nederlander will cease to serve as a Director of the Company following the completion of the Separation Plan and will serve as a Director of Realogy at the time of the Realogy distribution.

Mr. NelsonMs. Rosenberghas been a Director since April 2003, Chief Financial Officer since May 2003 and President since October 2004. Mr. Nelson has been Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company’s Vehicle Rental business since January 2006. From December 2005 to April 2006, Mr. Nelson was Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company’s Travel Distribution Division. From April 2003 to May 2003, Mr. Nelson was Senior Executive Vice President, Finance. From November 1994 until March 2003, Mr. Nelson was Co-Chief Operating Officer of DreamWorks SKG. Prior thereto, he was Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and a Director at Paramount Communications, Inc., formerly Gulf+Western Industries, Inc. Mr. Nelson will continue to serve as a Director of the Company following completion of the Separation Plan. Mr. Nelson will serve as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company upon the earlier of (i) the completion of the Separation Plan or (ii) December 31, 2006.

Mr. Pittmanhas been a Director since December 1997 and was a Director of HFS from July 1994 until December 1997. Mr. Pittman is a member of Pilot Group Manager LLC, the manager of Pilot Group LP, a private equity fund. From May 2002 to July 2002, Mr. Pittman served as Chief Operating Officer of AOL Time Warner, Inc. Mr. Pittman also served as Co-Chief Operating Officer of AOL Time Warner prior to assuming these responsibilities. From February 1998 until January 2001, Mr. Pittman was President and Chief Operating Officer of America Online, Inc., a provider of internet online services. Mr. Pittman also serves as a Director of Electronic Arts Inc., which files reports pursuant to the Exchange Act. Mr. Pittman will cease to serve as a Director of the Company following the completion of the Separation Plan and will serve as a Director of Realogy at the time of the Realogy distribution.

Ms. Richardshas been a Director since March 20032000 and Chairman of the AuditCompensation Committee since October 2004. Since November 2003, Ms. Richards has been Director of Development at the Saltus Grammar School, the largest private school in Bermuda. From January 2001 until March 2003, Ms. Richards served as Chief Financial Officer of Lombard Odier Darier Hentsch (Bermuda) Limited in Bermuda, a trust company business. From January 1999 until December 2000, she was Treasurer of Gulfstream Financial Limited, a stock brokerage company. From January 1999 to June 1999, Ms. Richards served as a consultant to Aon Group of Companies, Bermuda, an insurance brokerage company, after serving in different positions from 1988 through 1998. These positions included Controller, Senior Vice President and Group Financial Controller and Chief Financial Officer. Ms. Richards will cease to serve as a Director of the Company following the completion of the Separation Plan and will serve as a Director of Wyndham Worldwide at the time of the Wyndham Worldwide distribution.

Ms. Rosenberghas been a Director since April 2000.August 2006. From January 2000 to September 2003, Ms. Rosenberg served as Vice Chairwoman of Equity Group Investments, Inc., a privately held investment company. From October 1994 to December 1999, Ms. Rosenberg was President and Chief Executive Officer of Equity Group Investments, Inc. Ms. Rosenberg serves as a Director of the following companies which file reports pursuant to the Exchange Act: CVS Corporation, Equity Life Style Properties, Inc., Equity Residential Properties Trust Equity Office Property Trust and Ventas, Inc. Ms. Rosenberg will continue to serve as a Director of the Company following the completion of the Separation Plan.

Mr. Salernowill be has been President, Chief Operating Officer and a Director of the Company following the completion of the Separation Plan.since August 2006. Mr. Salerno has been Chief Executive Officer of Avis Budget Car Rental, LLC since April 2004. He was previously President and Chief Operating Officer of Cendant Car Rental Group, Inc. from November 2002 until April 2004 and was President and Chief Operating Officer of Avis from 1996 through November 2002. In 1995, he was named Executive Vice President of Operations and in July 1990, Senior Vice President and General Manager of Avis.

Mr. SmithSweeneyhas been a Director since December 1997 and Chairman of the Compensation Committee since October 2004. Mr. Smith was a Director of HFS from February 1993 until December 1997. From March 2003 to

April 2004, Mr. Smith served as the Chairman of the Board of American Remanufacturers Inc., a Chicago, Illinois automobile parts remanufacturer in which Mr. Smith had an equity interest. From February 1999 to September 2003, Mr. Smith served as Chief Executive Officer of Car Component Technologies, Inc., an automobile parts remanufacturer located in Bedford, New Hampshire. Mr. Smith is the retired Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of American Express Bank, Ltd. (“AEBL”). Mr. Smith joined AEBL’s parent company, the American Express Company, in 1981 as Corporate Treasurer before moving to AEBL and serving as Vice Chairman and Co-Chief Operating Officer and then President prior to becoming Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Smith will cease to serve as a Director of the Company following the completion of the Separation Plan and will serve as a Director of Realogy at the time of the Realogy distribution.

Mr. Sweeney will become a Director and Chairman of the Audit Committee upon completion of the Separation Plan.since August 2006. Mr. Sweeney has been a financial advisor and equity investor in several privately held enterprises since 1998. In 1997, Mr. Sweeney served in a senior financial and operating capacity for a joint venture between DreamWorks SKG and Pacific Data Images. From 1995 to 1996, Mr. Sweeney was the Chief Executive Officer and a Director of Vehicle Information Network, a database management and marketing company. From 1994 to 1995, Mr. Sweeney was the Chief Financial Officer and Principal of The Onyx Group, a shopping center development and management company. From 1968 to 1994, Mr. Sweeney served in various positions at The Times Mirror Company, the last eight years as Vice President, Finance. Mr. Sweeney serves on the board of the Payden & Rygel Investment Group, which files reports pursuant to the Exchange Act.

Functions and Meetings of the Board of Directors

Statement on Corporate Governance

Overview. The Board of Directors has implemented numerous corporate governance enhancements in recent years to further strengthen the Board of Directors’ capacity to oversee the Company and to serve the long-term interests of all stockholders. The Company’s corporate governance guidelines, director independence criteria, committee charters, codes of conduct and other documents setting forth the Company’s corporate governance practices can be accessed in the “Investor Center — Relations—Corporate Governance” section of the Company’s website atwww.cendant.comwww.avisbudgetgroup.comor by writing to the Company at Cendant Corporation, 9 West 57th Street,Avis Budget Group, Inc., 6 Sylvan Way, Parsippany, New York, New York 10019,Jersey 07054, Attention: Investor Relations. In addition, the Board has reviewed the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the rules of the SEC and the New York Stock Exchange’s governance listing standards regarding corporate governance policies and procedures and determined that the Company is in compliance with all such standards.

Director Independence.Independence The

Each year, our Board has created a set of director independence criteria (“Director Independence Criteria”) for evaluating the independenceDirectors reviews all commercial and charitable relationships of each director to evaluate such director’s independence pursuant to Rule 303A.2 of the Directors, which are more stringent than the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) governance standards.Listed Company Manual and our own director independence criteria, which can be accessed on our website atwww.avisbudgetgroup.com and is attached hereto as Annex A. In February 2006, the Board undertookconducting its annual review of Director independence pursuant to NYSE Rule 303A.02(a) and the Company’s Director Independence Criteria. During this review, the Board reviewed whether any transactionsof Directors considers a number of factors, including the director’s and his or her immediate family members’ relationships exist currently or during the past three years existed between each Director andwith the Company and its subsidiaries, affiliates, executive officers and equity investorsauditors; his or independent auditors. The Board also examinedher relationships with foundations, universities and other non-profit organizations to which the Company has made a certain level of contributions during the past three years; and whether there were any transactionssuch director or relationships between each Director andhis or her immediate family members have, during the past three years, been part of the senior managementan “interlocking directorate” in which an executive officer of the Company served on the compensation (or equivalent) committee of another company that employs such director or their affiliates. As a result of this review,his or her immediate family member as an executive officer.

After evaluating the factors described above, the Board of Directors has affirmatively determined that over two-thirdsfive of the Directors wereour current directors are independent under the corporate governance listing standards set forthof the NYSE and our own director independence criteria. Our independent directors are currently Leonard S. Coleman, Mary C. Choksi, Lynn Krominga, Sheli Z. Rosenberg and Stender E. Sweeney. In addition, prior to the Cendant Separation, the following former directors of Cendant Corporation who served as directors during the last fiscal year were independent during their respective tenures, based upon the corporate governance listing standards of the NYSE and our own director independence criteria: Myra Biblowit, George Herrera, Louise MacBain, Cheryl Mills, Brian Mulroney, Robert Nederlander, Robert Pittman, Pauline Richards and Robert Smith. In connection

with its determination that Ms. Choksi is independent, the Board of Directors considered the relationship between Strategic Investment Partners, where Ms. Choksi is a Managing Director, and the clients of such firm that provide services to the Company. In connection with its determination that Mr. Mulroney was independent, the Board of Directors considered the fact that Mr. Mulroney was a Senior Partner of Ogilvy Renault, a Montreal-based law firm, and that Ogilvy Renault represented the Company in the Company’s Director Independence Criteria andcertain matters in 2006. Amounts paid by the NYSE standards. Messrs. Silverman, Buckman, HolmesCompany to Ogilvy Renault in 2006 were less than $120,000 and Nelson, who were employeesconstituted less than 1% of Ogilvy Renault’s gross revenues for such year.

We also maintain a Corporate Governance Committee, a Compensation Committee and an Audit Committee, and all of the Company atdirectors serving on such time, and Mr. Edelman, who is of counsel to a law firm that representscommittees are independent, based upon the Company from time to time, were not deemed independent. With respect to the Directors expected to serve following completioncorporate governance listing standards of the Separation Plan, more than one-half of the Directors will be independent under the standards set forth in the Company’s Director Independence CriteriaNYSE and by the NYSE standards. Messrs. Nelson and Salerno, who will be employees of the Company, will not be deemed independent. Mr. Edelman is expected to be independent following completion of the Separation Plan. A copy of the Company’s Director Independence Criteria is attached to this Proxy Statement as Annex A and also can be found in the “Investor Center — Corporate Governance” section of the Company’s website atwww.cendant.com. A copy may also be obtained upon request from the Company’s Corporate Secretary at the address provided above.our own director independence criteria.

Presiding Director.Director

In February 2003, the Board of Directors created a new position of Presiding Director. The Presiding Director’s primary responsibilities include presiding over periodic executive sessions of the non-management members of the Board of Directors, advising the Chairman of the Board and Committee chairs with respect to meeting agenda and information needs, providing advice with respect to the selection of Committee chairs and performing other duties that the Board may from time to time delegate to assist it in the fulfillment of its responsibilities. The non-management members of the Board of Directors have designated Mr. Coleman to serve in this position until the Company’s 20062008 annual meeting of stockholders. Mr. Coleman is expected to continue to serve in this position following the completion of the Separation Plan.

Communicating with the Board of Directors.Directors

Stockholders and other interested parties may send communications to the Company’s Board of Directors by writing to the Board, c/o the Secretary, at Cendant Corporation, 9 West 57th Street,Avis Budget Group, Inc., 6 Sylvan Way, Parsippany, New York, New York 10019.Jersey 07054. In addition, stockholdersall parties interested in communicating directly with the Presiding Director or with any other non-management Directordirector may do so by writing to Cendant CorporationAvis Budget Group, Inc. at the same address, Attention: Presiding Director, c/o the Corporate Secretary or via e-mail atpresidingdirector@cendant.com.presidingdirector@avisbudget.com. The Presiding Director will review and distribute all stockholderinterested parties communications received to the intended recipients and/or distribute to the full Board, as appropriate.

Codes of Conduct.Conduct

The Board has adopted a code of conduct that applies to all officers and employees, including the Company’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer. The Board has also adopted a code of business conduct and ethics for Directors.directors. Both codes of conduct are available in the “Investor Center — Relations—Corporate Governance” section of the Company’s website atwww.cendant.comwww.avisbudgetgroup.com, or by writing the Company at Cendant Corporation, 9 West 57th Street,Avis Budget Group, Inc., 6 Sylvan Way, Parsippany, New York, New York 10019,Jersey 07054, Attention: Investor Relations. The purpose of these codes of conduct is to promote honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships; to promote full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in periodic reports required to be filed by the Company; and to promote compliance with all applicable rules and regulations that apply to the Company and its officers and Directors.directors.

Board Meetings

The Board of Directors held fifteenseven meetings and acted by unanimous written consent on foursix occasions during 2005.2006. In 2005,2006, all incumbent Directorsdirectors attended at least 75% of the aggregate number of meetings of the Board and committees of the Board on which they served. All Directorsdirectors are required to attend each regularly scheduled Board meeting, as well asmeeting. Attendance at each annual meeting of the Company’s stockholders subject to certain limited exceptions. In 2005, the entire Board of Directors attended the Company’sis strongly encouraged. The 2006 annual meeting of stockholders other than Messrs. Mulroney and Pittman and Ms. Mills pursuant to such exceptions.was attended by three of our six then current directors.

Committees of the Board

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee is presently comprised of Mses. RichardsMr. Sweeney (Chairman), Mills and RosenbergMses. Krominga and Mr. SmithChoksi (the “Audit Committee”). The Audit Committee oversees the accounting and financial reporting processes of the Company, as well as the audits of the financial statements of the Company. See “Report of Audit Committee” below. The Board has determined that all members of the Audit CommitteeareCommittee are independent Directorsdirectors under the rules of the NYSE, and the Company’s Director Independence Criteria and within the meaning of applicable SEC rules, and that each member of the Audit CommitteehasCommittee has the ability to read and understand fundamental financial statements. The Board has determined that each of Ms. Richards and Mr. Smith qualifySweeney qualifies as an “Audit Committee financial expert” as defined by the rules of the SEC, and, in addition to being independent under the Company’s Director Independence Criteria and the rules of the NYSE, are independent within the meaning of applicable SEC rules. Following the completion of the Separation Plan, the Audit Committee is expected to be comprised of Mr. Sweeney (Chairman), Ms. Rosenberg and Mr. Edelman. All such members will be independent Directors under the rules

of the NYSE, the Company’s Director Independence Criteria and applicable SEC rules.SEC. The member who will qualify as an “Audit Committee financial expert” will be named prior to the mailing of this Proxy Statement. Each member of the Audit Committee following completion of the Separation Plan will have the ability to read and understand fundamental financial statements. A copytext of the Audit Committee charter is attached to this Proxy Statement as Annex B and also can also be found in the “Investor Center — Relations—Corporate Governance” section of the Company’s website atwww.cendant.comwww.avisbudgetgroup.com, or may be obtained by contacting the Company’s Corporate Secretary. The Audit Committee held eleveneight meetings in 2005.2006.

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee is presently comprised of Ms. Rosenberg (Chairman), Ms. Krominga and Mr. Smith (Chairman) and Mses. Biblowit and RosenbergColeman (the “Compensation Committee”). The Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Compensation CommitteeisCommittee is an independent Director under the rules of the NYSE and the Company’s Director Independence Criteria. The Compensation Committee administers the Company’s equity compensation plans, reviews and administers all compensation arrangements for executive officers and establishes and reviews general policies relating to the compensation and benefits of the Company’s officers and employees. Following completion of the Separation Plan, the Compensation Committee is expected to be comprised of Ms. Rosenberg (Chairman), Mr. Coleman and Mr. Edelman. Each such member will be an independent director under the rules of the NYSE and the Company’s Director Independence Criteria. The text of the Compensation Committee charter can be found in the “Investor Center — Relations—Corporate Governance” section of the Company’s website atwww.cendant.comwww.avisbudgetgroup.com, or may be obtained by contacting the Company’s Corporate Secretary. The Compensation Committee held sevennine meetings and acted by unanimous written consent on three occasionsone occasion in 2005.2006.

The role of the committee is to assure that our senior executives are compensated effectively in a manner consistent with our stated compensation strategy, internal equity considerations, and competitive practice. The primary responsibilities are as follows:

Review and approve our stated compensation strategy;

Review annually and determine the individual elements of total compensation for the Chief Executive Officer;

Review and approve the individual elements of total compensation for our senior executives;

Assure that our annual and long-term bonus and incentive compensation plans are administered in a manner consistent with our compensation strategy;

Make recommendations to the Board with respect to incentive compensation plans and equity-based plans and approve, subject, where appropriate, to submission to shareholders, all new equity-related incentive plans for senior executives; and

Review and approve stock option and other equity awards.

We refer you to “Executive Compensation” below for additional information regarding the Committee’s processes and procedures.

Corporate Governance Committee

The Corporate Governance Committee is presently comprised of Messrs. NederlanderMr. Coleman (Chairman), Ms. Rosenberg and Mulroney and Mses. Mills and RosenbergMr. Sweeney (the “Corporate Governance Committee”). The Board of Directors has determined that each of the current members qualifies as an independent Directordirector under the rules of the NYSE and the Company’s Director Independence Criteria. The responsibilities of the Corporate Governance Committee include identifying and recommending to the Board appropriate Directordirector nominee candidates and providing oversight with respect to corporate governance matters. Following the completion of the Separation Plan, the Corporate Governance Committee is expected to be comprised of Mr. Coleman (Chairman), Mr. Sweeney and Ms. Rosenberg. Each such member will be an independent director under the rules of the NYSE and the Company’s Director Independence Criteria. The text of the Corporate Governance Committee charter can be found in the “Investor Center —

“Investor Relations—Corporate Governance” section of the Company’s website atwww.cendant.comwww.avisbudgetgroup.com, or may be obtained by contacting the Company’s Corporate Secretary. The Corporate Governance Committee held two meetings in 2005.2006.

Director Nomination Procedures.Procedures

The Corporate Governance Committee considers the appropriate balance of experience, skills and characteristics required of the Board of Directors. It seeks to ensure that all members of the Company’s Audit Committee meet the Company’s Director Independence Criteria and the financial literacy requirements under the rules of the NYSE, and that at least one of them qualifies as an “Audit Committee financial expert” under the rules of the SEC; and that all members of the Compensation Committee and the Corporate Governance Committee meet the Company’s Director Independence Criteria. Nominees for Directordirector are selected on the basis of their depth and breadth of experience, wisdom, integrity, ability to make independent analytical inquiries, understanding of the Company’s business environment, and willingness to devote adequate time to Board duties.

The Corporate Governance Committee will consider written proposals from stockholders for nominees for Director.director. In considering candidates submitted by stockholders, the Corporate Governance Committee will take into consideration the needs of the Board and the qualifications of the candidate. Any such nominations should

be submitted to the Corporate Governance Committee, c/o the Corporate Secretary of the Company, and should include the following: (a) the name of the stockholder and evidence of the person’s ownership of the Company’s Common Stock, including the number of shares owned and the length of time of ownership; and (b) the name of the candidate, the candidate’s resume or a listing of his or her qualifications to be a Directordirector of the Company and the person’s consent to be named as a Directordirector if selected by the Corporate Governance Committee and nominated by the Board. The written proposal should be submitted in the time frame described in the by-laws of the Company and under the caption “Stockholder Proposals for 20072008 Annual Meeting” below.

The process for identifying and evaluating nominees to the Board of Directors is initiated by identifying a candidate who meets the criteria for selection as a nominee and has the specific qualities or skills being sought based on input from members of the Board and, if the Corporate Governance Committee deems appropriate, a third-party search firm. These candidates are evaluated by the Corporate Governance Committee by reviewing the candidates’ biographical information and qualification and checking the candidates’ references. Qualified nominees are interviewed by at least one member of the Corporate Governance Committee. Using the input from such interview and other information obtained by them, the Corporate Governance Committee evaluates whether such prospective candidate is qualified to serve as a Directordirector and whether the committee should recommend to the Board that the Board nominate this prospective candidate or elect such candidate to fill a vacancy on the Board. Candidates recommended by the Corporate Governance Committee are presented to the Board for selection as nominees to be presented for the approval of the stockholders or for election to fill a vacancy.

The Corporate Governance Committee expects that a similar evaluation process will be used to evaluate nominees for Directordirector recommended by stockholders. However, to date, the Company has not received any stockholder proposal to nominate a Director.director.

Policy Committee

The Policy Committee is presently comprised of Messrs. Coleman (Chairman), Herrera and Edelman and Ms. Biblowit (the “Policy Committee”). The Policy Committee is responsible for reviewing, identifying and, when appropriate, bringing to the attention of the Board political, social and legal trends and issues that may have an impact on the business operations, financial performance or public image of the Company, as well as for making recommendations to the Board on corporate policies and practices that relate to public policy. The Policy Committee held three meetings in 2005. Following the completion of the Separation Plan, the Board of Directors will evaluate whether the Policy Committee will continue to exist or whether the responsibilities of the Policy Committee will be assumed by another committee of the Board of Directors.

Separation Committee

The Separation Committee is comprised of Messrs. Pittman and Edelman and Ms. Rosenberg (the “Separation Committee”). After preliminary approving the Separation Plan, the Board established the Separation Committee to assist with and oversee the separation process. Since October 23, 2005, the Board and the Separation Committee met numerous times to discuss the separation with and without members of the Company’s senior management team. In these meetings, the Board and the Separation Committee considered, among other things, the benefits to the businesses and to the Company’s stockholders that are expected to result from the separation, the capital allocation strategies and dividend policies for the separated companies, the allocation of the Company’s existing assets, liabilities and businesses among the separated companies, the terms of certain commercial relationships among the separated companies that will exist following the separation, the corporate governance arrangements that will be in place at each company following the separation, and the appropriate members of senior management at each company following the separation. The Separation Committee is not expected to continue to exist following completion of the Separation Plan.

Executive Committee

The Executive Committee is presently comprised of Messrs. SilvermanNelson (Chairman), Buckman, NelsonSalerno and Edelman (the “Executive Committee”). Following the completion of the Separation Plan, the Executive

Committee will be comprised of Messrs. Nelson (Chairman), Salerno and Edelman. The Executive Committee has and may exercise all of the powers of the Board of Directors when the Board is not in session, including the power to authorize the issuance of stock, except that the Executive Committee has no power to (a) alter, amend or repeal the by-laws or any resolution or resolutions of the Board of Directors, (b) declare any dividend or make any other distribution to the stockholders of the Company, (c) appoint any member of the Executive Committee, or (d) take any other action which legally may be taken only by the full Board of Directors. The Chairman of the Board will serve as Chairman of the Executive Committee both prior to and following the completion of the Separation Plan. The Executive Committee acted by unanimous written consent on nineteenfifteen occasions in 2005.

Director Compensation

In 2003, the Corporate Governance Committee undertook a study of director compensation (the “Director Compensation Review”) and adopted the following guidelines for director compensation: (i) compensation should fairly pay Directors for the work and time commitment required in a company the size and scope of the Company; (ii) compensation should align Director interests with the long-term interests of the Company’s stockholders; and (iii) the structure of compensation should be simple, transparent and easy for stockholders to understand. The Corporate Governance Committee retained an independent compensation consultant to assist the committee in formulating a new compensation structure to satisfy the new guidelines and to provide a written report verifying the reasonableness of such new compensation structure. As a result of such undertaking, the Corporate Governance Committee recommended, and the Board approved, a modified Non-Employee Director compensation program effective January 1, 2004. The following sets forth the compensation payments made to Non-Employee Directors in 2005 (amounts shown in dollars unless otherwise indicated):

2005
Compensation(1)(2)

Annual Retainer(3)

160,000

Annual Equity Incentive Grant

(4)

Board Meeting Attendance Fees:

Board Meeting Fee (per meeting)

0

Committee Meeting Fee (Chair/Member)

0

Action By Unanimous Written Consent

0

Audit Committee Chair

30,000

Audit Committee Member

20,000

Compensation Committee Chair

25,000

Compensation Committee Member

10,000

Corporate Governance Committee Chair

15,000

Corporate Governance Committee Member

8,000

Policy Committee Chair

10,000

Policy Committee Member

5,000

Executive Committee Member

10,000

Presiding Director Stipend

20,000

Separation Committee Member (per meeting)

2,000

Other Benefits

Life Insurance(5)

(1)Members of the Board of Directors who are also officers or employees of the Company or any of its subsidiaries do not receive compensation for serving as a Director.

(2)The Presiding Director Stipend and all committee membership stipends are to be paid 50% in cash and 50% in shares of Common Stock required to be deferred under the Deferral Plan (described below). Directors may elect to receive more than 50% of such stipends in shares of deferred Common Stock.

(3)

The Annual Retainer (the “Retainer”) is paid on a quarterly basis on or near the date of regularly scheduled quarterly Board meetings. For 2005, $80,000 of the Retainer was paid in the form of Common Stock

required to be deferred under a deferred compensation plan maintained by the Company for the benefit of Non-Employee Directors (the “Deferral Plan”). For 2005, a Non-Employee Director could elect to receive a portion or the entire balance of the Retainer in the form of shares of Common Stock. The number of shares of Common Stock received pursuant to the Common Stock portion of the Retainer or any other compensation paid in the form of Common Stock equaled the value of the compensation being paid in the form of Common Stock, divided by the fair market value of the Common Stock as of the date of grant. All amounts deferred into the Deferral Plan are deferred in the form of deferred stock units. Each deferred stock unit entitles the Non-Employee Director to receive one share of Common Stock immediately following such Director’s retirement or separation of service from the Board for any reason. The Non-Employee Directors may not sell or receive value from any deferred stock unit prior to such separation of service.

(4)Notwithstanding the elimination of the annual equity incentive grant in 2004, new Non-Employee Directors received a one-time grant of 5,000 shares of Common Stock, which is required to be deferred under the Deferral Plan.

(5)The Company provides $100,000 of term life insurance coverage for each Non-Employee Director. In addition, the Company provides each Director with the ability to obtain life insurance in the amount of $1 million on his or her life. Certain, but not all, Directors participate in this program. Upon the death of such Director while still in office, the Company will donate an aggregate of $1 million to one or more charitable organizations that such Director served or supported. Following completion of the Separation Plan, the Company will no longer provide this program.

The following table sets forth the compensation for future services expected to be paid to Non-Employee Directors following the completion of the Separation Plan. All director compensation, other than the new director equity grant, is expected to be pro-rated for 2006.

   Compensation(1)(2)

Annual Director Retainer(3)

  $150,000

New Director Equity Grant(4)

   75,000

Board and Committee Meeting Attendance Fee

   

Audit Committee Chair

   20,000

Audit Committee Member

   10,000

Compensation Committee Chair

   15,000

Compensation Committee Member

   7,500

Corporate Governance Committee Chair

   10,000

Corporate Governance Committee Member

   5,000

Executive Committee Member

   8,000

(1)Members of the Board of Directors who are also officers or employees of the Company or any of its subsidiaries will not receive compensation for serving as directors (other than travel-related expenses for meetings held outside of the Company’s headquarters).

(2)The committee chair stipends and all committee membership stipends will be paid 50% in cash and 50% in deferred Common Stock. Directors may elect to receive more than 50% of such stipends in deferred Common Stock.

(3)The Annual Retainer (the “Retainer”) will be paid on a quarterly basis. The Retainer will be paid equally 50% in cash and 50% in shares of Common Stock required to be deferred under the Deferral Plan. A director may elect to receive the entire Retainer in the form of deferred Common Stock. The number of shares of Common Stock to be received pursuant to the common stock portion of the Retainer or any other compensation to be paid in the form of Common Stock will equal the value of the compensation being paid in the form of Common Stock, divided by the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date of grant. Each share of deferred Common Stock will entitle the Non-Employee Director to receive one share of Common Stock immediately following such Director’s retirement or termination of service from the Board for any reason. The Non-Employee Directors may not sell or receive value from any shares of deferred Common Stock prior to such termination of service.

(4)The grant will be made in the form of deferred Common Stock. The number of shares will equal $75,000 divided by the fair market value of a share of Common Stock as of the close of business on the date of the grant. Persons serving as Non-Employee Directors at the time of the completion of the Separation Plan will receive their grant as of the first trading day following completion of the Separation Plan.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The information set forth on the following table is furnishedsets forth information regarding beneficial ownership of Avis Budget Group, Inc. as of June 30, 2006 as to those shares of the Company’s Common Stock beneficially ownedMarch 3, 2007 by (i) each person who is known by the Companyus to own beneficially more than 5% of the Company’sAvis Budget Group’s Common Stock, (ii) each of its DirectorsAvis Budget Group’s directors and each of its executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table below, and (iii) all of its directors and current executive officers as a group. The information set forth on the following table also includes those shares of Avis Budget Group’s Common Stock beneficially owned by each of its former executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table below.

 

Name

  Total Amount
of Shares
Beneficially
Owned(1)
  Percent of
Common Stock
Owned(2)
  Of the Total
Number of Shares
Beneficially
Owned, Shares
which May be
Acquired within
60 days(3)

Principal Stockholder:

     

Barclays Global Investors, N.A. (4)

  88,938,800  8.87% 88,938,800

Directors and Executive Officers(5):

     

Henry R. Silverman

  34,677,415  3.46% 25,439,589

Myra J. Biblowit(6)

  143,765  *  143,765

James E. Buckman(7)

  3,764,808  *  3,642,429

Leonard S. Coleman(8)

  407,490  *  407,490

Martin L. Edelman(9)

  335,805  *  332,805

George Herrera(10)

  15,756  *  15,756

Stephen P. Holmes(11)

  4,013,216  *  3,589,327

Louise T. Blouin MacBain(12)

  1,573,126  *  1,573,126

Cheryl D. Mills(13)

  143,143  *  136,429

The Right Honourable Brian Mulroney(14)

  466,739  *  457,955

Robert E. Nederlander(15)

  333,013  *  333,013

Ronald L. Nelson(16)

  1,497,863  *  1,310,164

Robert W. Pittman(17)

  905,420  *  842,592

Pauline D.E. Richards(18)

  19,580  *  19,580

Sheli Z. Rosenberg(19)

  156,086  *  124,904

Robert F. Smith(20)

  282,451  *  282,451

Richard A. Smith(21)

  3,757,731  *  3,579,949

All directors and executive officers as a group (19 persons)

  52,733,099  5.26% 42,460,328

Name of Beneficial Owner

  Total Amount of
Shares Beneficially
Owned (1)
  Percent of
Common Stock
Owned (2)
  Of the Total
Number of Shares
Beneficially
Owned, Shares
which May be
Acquired within
60 days (3)

Principal Stockholders:

      

Hotchkis and Wiley Capital Management, LLC(4)

  7,664,983  7.558  —  

Neuberger Berman Inc.(5)

  5,758,336  5.678  —  

Barclays Global Investors, N.A.(6)

  5,734,977  5.654  —  

Directors and Current Named Executive Officers:

      

Ronald L. Nelson(7)

  149,786  *  104,249

Leonard S. Coleman(8)

  46,160  *  46,160

Martin L. Edelman(9)

  38,817  *  38,517

Lynn Krominga(10)

  5,024  *  5,024

Sheli Z. Rosenberg(11)

  22,925  *  19,710

F. Robert Salerno(12)

  91,947  *  85,468

Stender E. Sweeney(13)

  7,376  *  7,276

Mary C. Choksi(14)

  203  *  203

John T. McClain

  41,283  *  38,542

Mark J. Servodidio

  25,848  *  23,694

David B. Wyshner

  70,687  *  67,251

All Directors and Current Executive Officers as a group (15 persons)

  557,829  *  488,776

Former Executive Officers who are Named Executive Officers:

      

Henry R. Silverman

  3,467,743  3.34  2,543,960

Stephen P. Holmes(15)

  395,402  *  337,253

James E. Buckman(16)

  329,912  *  307,037

*Amount represents less than 1% of outstanding common stock.Common Stock.

(1)Shares beneficially owned include direct and indirect ownership of shares, stock options and restricted stock units that are currently vested or will become vested within 60 days of June 30, 2006,March 3, 2007, including certain stock-basedvested awards that will vest on the 30th day following the completion of the distributions of Realogy and Wyndham Worldwide (“Vested Awards”) anddeferred shares of Common Stockunder a deferred under the Deferral Plan (“Deferred Shares”).compensation plan.

(2)Based on 1,001,691,153101,419,861 shares of Common Stock outstanding on June 30, 2006.March 3, 2007.

(3)Includes Vested Awards and Deferred Shares.

(4)

Reflects beneficial ownership of 88,938,8007,664,983 shares of Common Stock by Hotchkis and Wiley Capital Management, LLC (“Hotchkis and Wiley”), as derived solely from information reported in a Schedule 13G under the Exchange Act filed by Hotchkis and Wiley with the SEC on February 14, 2007. Such Schedule

13G indicates that Hotchkis and Wiley has sole voting power over 6,149,222 of the shares and no voting power over 1,515,761 of the shares. The principal business address for Hotchkis and Wiley Capital Management, LLC is 725 S. Figueroa Street, 39th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90017. Information is based upon the assumption that Hotchkis and Wiley holds 7,664,983 shares of Common Stock as of March 3, 2007.

(5)Reflects beneficial ownership of 5,758,336 shares of Common Stock by Neuberger Berman Inc. and Neuberger Berman, LLC (together, “Neuberger Berman”), as derived solely from information reported in a Schedule 13G under the Exchange Act filed by Neuberger Berman with the SEC on February 13, 2007. Such Schedule 13G indicates that Neuberger Berman has sole voting power over 4,683,856 of the shares, shared voting power over 17,930 and no voting power over 1,056,550 of the shares. The principal business address for Neuberger Berman Inc. is 605 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10158. Information is based upon the assumption that Neuberger Berman holds 5,758,336 shares of Common Stock as of March 3, 2007.
(6)Reflects beneficial ownership of 5,734,977 shares of Common Stock by Barclays Global Investors, N.A. and its affiliated entities (“Barclays”), as derived solely from information reported in a Schedule 13G under the Exchange Act filed by Barclays with the SEC on January 26, 2006.23, 2007. Such Schedule 13G indicates that Barclays has sole voting power over 78,108,2675,064,912 of the shares and no voting power over 10,830,533 of the

shares. The principal business address for Barclays Global Investors, N.A. is 45 Fremont Street, San Francisco, CA 94015. Information is based upon the assumption that Barclays holds 88,938,800 shares of Common Stock as of June 30, 2006.

  (5)Such Director’s and/or Executive Officer’s Vested Awards are deemed outstanding for purposes of computing the percentages of the class for such Director and/or Executive Officer.

  (6)Includes 29,092 Deferred Shares.

  (7)Includes 16,100 shares held in Mr. Buckman’s IRA account and 68,082 shares held in a non-qualified deferred compensation plan.

  (8)Includes 32,035 Deferred Shares.

  (9)Includes 30,486 Deferred Shares.

(10)Includes 15,756 Deferred Shares.

(11)Includes 16,971 shares held by Mr. Holmes’ children, 110,000 shares held in a trust and 90,626 shares held in a non-qualified deferred compensation plan.

(12)Includes 9,391 Deferred Shares.

(13)Includes 21,756 Deferred Shares.

(14)Includes 30,376 Deferred Shares.

(15)Includes 30,694 Deferred Shares.

(16)Includes 90,374 shares held in a non-qualified deferred compensation plan and 22,325 shares held in a second non-qualified deferred compensation plan.

(17)Includes 39,232 Deferred Shares.

(18)Includes 19,580 Deferred Shares.

(19)Includes 22,393 Deferred Shares.

(20)Includes 32,256 Deferred Shares.

(21)Includes 105,040 shares held in a non-qualified deferred compensation plan and 517 shares held in a second non-qualified deferred compensation plan.

The information set forth on the following table is furnished as of June 30, 2006 as to those shares of the Company’s Common Stock beneficially owned by (i) each person who is known by the Company to own beneficially more than 5% of the Company’s Common Stock, (ii) each of its Directors that will serve after the completion of the Separation Plan and (iii) each of its executive officers that will serve following the Separation Plan.

Name

  Total Amount
of Shares
Beneficially
Owned(1)
  Percent of
Common Stock
Owned(2)
  Of the Total
Number of Shares
Beneficially
Owned, Shares
which May be
Acquired within
60 days(3)
 

Principal Stockholder:

     

Barclays Global Investors, N.A.(4)

  88,938,800  8.87% 88,938,800 

Directors and Executive Officers(5):

     

Ronald L. Nelson(6)

  1,497,863  *  1,310,164 

Leonard S. Coleman(7)

  407,490  *  407,490 

Martin L. Edelman(8)

  335,805  *  332,805 

Sheli Z. Rosenberg(9)

  156,086  *  124,904 

F. Robert Salerno

  1,128,190  *  1,125,300 

Stender E. Sweeney

  –        *  –      (10)

W. Scott Deaver

  148,865  *  147,905 

Karen C. Sclafani

  105,403  *  101,463 

Mark J. Servodidio

  167,171  *  165,166 

David B. Wyshner

  516,242  *  506,888 

Michael P. Collins

  221,489  *  217,676 

Gerald R. Riordan

  29,943  *  27,943 

Patric T. Siniscalchi

  156,677  *  156,677 

John T. McClain

  363,082  *  352,996 

All directors and executive officers as a group (15 persons)

  5,234,306  5.23% 4,977,377 

*Amount represents less than 1% of outstanding common stock.

(1)Shares beneficially owned include direct and indirect ownership of shares, stock options and restricted stock units that are currently vested or will become vested within 60 days of June 30, 2006, including Vested Awards and Deferred Shares.

(2)Based on 1,001,691,153 shares of Common Stock outstanding on June 30, 2006.

(3)Includes Vested Awards and Deferred Shares.

(4)Reflects beneficial ownership of 88,938,800 shares of Common Stock by Barclays Global Investors, N.A. and its affiliated entities (“Barclays”), as derived solely from information reported in a Schedule 13G under the Exchange Act filed by Barclays with the SEC on January 26, 2006. Such Schedule 13G indicates that Barclays has sole voting power over 78,108,267 of the shares and no voting power over 10,830,533670,065 of the shares. The principal business address for Barclays Global Investors, N.A. is 45 Fremont Street, San Francisco, CA 94015. Information is based upon the assumption that Barclays holds 88,938,8005,734,977 shares of Common Stock as of June 30, 2006.March 3, 2007.

(5)Such Director’s and/or Executive Officer’s Vested Awards are deemed outstanding for purposes of computing the percentages of the class for such Director and/or Executive Officer.

(6)(7)Includes 90,37418,067 deferred shares.
(8)Includes 8,614 deferred shares.
(9)Includes 8,285 deferred shares.
(10)Represents deferred shares.
(11)Includes 9,457 deferred shares.
(12)Includes 3,648 deferred shares.
(13)Includes 7,276 deferred shares.
(14)Represents deferred shares.
(15)Includes 18,127 shares held in a non-qualified deferred compensation plan, 11,000 shares held by trust and 1,697 held by children.
(16)Includes 13,536 shares held in a non-qualified deferred compensation plan and 22,3251,610 shares held in a second non-qualified deferred compensation plan.

(7)Includes 32,035 Deferred Shares.

(8)Includes 30,486 Deferred Shares.

(9)Includes 22,393 Deferred Shares.

(10)Mr. Sweeney will receive a new director equity grant in the form of deferred Common Stock. The number of shares will equal $75,000 divided by the fair market value of a share of the Company’s Common Stock as of the close of business on the date of grant, which is expected to be the first day following completion of the Separation Plan.James E. Buckman IRA.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The present executive officers of the Company are set forth in the table below. All executive officers are appointed at the annual meeting or interim meetings of the Board of Directors. Each executive officer is appointed by the Board to hold office until his or her successor is duly appointed and qualified.

Name

Offices or Positions Held

Henry R. Silverman

Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

James E. Buckman

Vice Chairman and General Counsel

Stephen P. Holmes

Vice Chairman; Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Travel Content Division

Ronald L. Nelson

President and Chief Financial Officer; Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Vehicle Rental

Richard A. Smith

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Real Estate Services Division and Senior Executive Vice President

Jeff Clarke

Chief Executive Officer and President, Travel Distribution Services

Linda C. Coughlin

Chief Administrative Officer

Virginia M. Wilson

Executive Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer

Followingat the completionpleasure of the Separation Plan,Board and may be removed at any time by the executive officers of the Company will be as set forth in the table below.Board with or without cause.

 

Name

  

Offices or Positions To be Held

Ronald L. Nelson

  

Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

F. Robert Salerno

  

President and Chief Operating Officer and Director

David B. Wyshner

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

W. Scott Deaver

  

Executive Vice President, Strategy

Larry De Shon

Executive Vice President, Operations

Karen C. Sclafani

  

Executive Vice President and General Counsel

Mark J. Servodidio

  

Executive Vice President, Human Resources

David B. Wyshner

Executive Vice President, Chief FinancialHuman Resource Officer and Treasurer

Michael P. Collins

Executive Vice President, Operations

Gerald R. Riordan

President, Budget Truck Rental

Patric T. Siniscalchi

  

SeniorExecutive Vice President, International Operations

John T. McClain

  

Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer

Biographical information concerning the executive officers of the Company who also presently serve as Directors, or are expected to serve as Directors following the completion of the Separation Plan, is set forth above under “Board of Directors — Directors—Biographical Information for Nominees.” Biographical information concerning all other present executive officers is set forth below.

 

Name

  

Biographical Information

Richard A. SmithMr. Smith, age 52, has been Senior Executive Vice President since September 1998 and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Real Estate Services Division since December 1997. Mr. Smith was President of the Real Estate Division of HFS from October 1996 to December 1997 and Executive Vice President of Operations for HFS from February 1992 to October 1996. Mr. Smith will cease to serve as an officer of the Company upon completion of the Separation Plan and will be the Vice Chairman of the Board and President of Realogy at the time of the Realogy distribution.
Linda C. CoughlinMs. Coughlin, age 54, has been Chief Administrative Officer since October 2004. From September 2002 to October 2004, Ms. Coughlin served as President of Linkage, Inc., a leadership and organization development firm. Ms. Coughlin also held senior positions at Zurich Scudder Investments, Inc., Scudder, Stevens & Clark, Citibank and American Express Company since 1976. In connection with the Separation Plan, Ms. Coughlin will cease to serve as the Chief Administrative Officer on or prior to December 31, 2006.
Jeff ClarkeMr. Clarke, age 45, has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Travelport since May 2006. From April 2004 to May 2006, Mr. Clarke was Chief Operating Officer of CA, Inc. (formerly Computer Associates Inc.). Earlier in April 2004, Mr. Clarke was named Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the software company CA, Inc. and continued to serve as Chief Financial Officer until February 2005. From 2002 through November 2003, Mr. Clarke was Executive Vice President, Global Operations at Hewlett-Packard Company. Before then, Mr. Clarke joined Compaq Computer Corporation in 1998 and held several positions, including Chief Financial Officer of Compaq from 2001 until the time of Compaq’s merger with Hewlett-Packard Company in 2002. Upon completion of the earlier of the sale or distribution of Travelport, Mr. Clarke will no longer be affiliated with the Company.
Virginia M. WilsonMs. Wilson, age 51, has been Executive Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer since September 2003. From October 1999 until August 2003, Ms. Wilson served as Senior Vice President and Controller for MetLife, Inc., a provider of insurance and other financial services. From 1996 until 1999, Ms. Wilson served as Senior Vice President and Controller for Transamerica Life Companies, an insurance and financial services company. Upon completion of the Wyndham Worldwide distribution, Ms. Wilson will cease to serve as Chief Accounting Officer and John T. McClain will become Chief Accounting Officer. Ms. Wilson will serve as the Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of Wyndham Worldwide.

Biographical information concerning all executive officers of the Company following completion of the Separation Plan is set forth below.

Name

Biographical Information

W. Scott DeaverMr. Deaver, age 54, will be Executive Vice President, Strategy. Over the past ten years, Mr. Deaver has served in a variety of roles with the Company and HFS, most recently serving as the Executive Vice President, Marketing for Avis Budget Car Rental, LLC. He has also served as Chief Marketing Officer for move.com, an online real estate and home services portal launched by the Company, and as Senior Vice President of corporate marketing of the Company.

Karen C. Sclafani

Ms. Sclafani, age 54, will be Executive Vice President and General Counsel. Ms. Sclafani has been Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Avis Budget Car Rental, LLC since November 2002 and became Executive Vice President on April 3, 2006. Ms. Sclafani was previously Senior Vice President and General Counsel of Avis since August 1998. Prior to being appointed General Counsel, Ms. Sclafani served as Vice President and Deputy General Counsel and in various other capacities in Avis’ legal department. Before joining Avis, she was a corporate associate with the law firm Mudge, Rose, Guthrie and Alexander in New York City.

Mark J. Servodidio

Mr. Servodidio, age 41, will be Executive Vice President, Human Resources. Mr. Servodidio has been Executive Vice President, Human Resources for Avis Budget Car Rental, LLC since November 2002. He joined Avis in April 2001 as Senior Vice President, Human Resources. Prior to joining Avis, Mr. Servodidio was with Kraft Foods, Inc. (formerly Nabisco) from 1996 to 2001 where he was most recently head of Human Resources for Nabisco’s sales and supply chain unit. Prior thereto, he served in various leadership roles at PepsiCo, Inc.

David B. Wyshner

  Mr. Wyshner, age 39, will behas been Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer.Treasurer since August 2006. Mr. Wyshner has beenwas Executive Vice President and Treasurer of the Company sincefrom January 2004 andto August 2006. Mr. Wyshner was named Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer of the Company’s Travel Content Division, which includesincluded the Company’s vehicle rental business of Avis and Budget, in July 2005. From 1999 until January 2004, Mr. Wyshner was employed in various roles at the Company, including serving as Executive Vice President for Finance, Planning and Development. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Wyshner was a Vice President in Merrill Lynch & Co.’s investment banking division, specializing in corporate finance and mergers and acquisitions.

Michael P. CollinsW. Scott Deaver

  Mr. Collins,Deaver, age 59, will be55, has been Executive Vice President, Operations.Strategy since September 2006. Over the past ten years, Mr. Deaver has served in a variety of roles with the Company and HFS. Mr. Deaver was Executive Vice President, Marketing for Avis Budget Car Rental, LLC from March 2001 to September 2006. He has also served as Chief Marketing Officer for move.com, an online real estate and home services portal launched by the Company, and as Senior Vice President of corporate marketing of the Company.

Larry De Shon

Mr. De Shon, age 47, has been Executive Vice President of Avis Budget Car Rental, LLCOperations since October 2006. From November 2002 and Executive Vice President, Operations for Avis since March 2001. Fromto June 2000 to March 2001, he2006, Mr. De Shon was Senior Vice President Operations for Avis. From 1996 through 2000,of airport operations at United Airlines. Mr. Collins was Vice President & General Manager of Avis’ International Operations. From 1987 through 1996, he was Vice President of Avis’ International Operations. From 1975 through 1987, Mr. Collins held variousDeShon began his 28 year career with United Airlines as a customer service representative and advanced to hold a number positions of increasing responsibility within Avis.

Gerald R. Riordan

Mr. Riordan, age 57, will be President, Budget Truck Rental. Mr. Riordan has been President of the Company’s Budget Truck Division since April 2003. Mr. Riordan was Chief Executive Officer of United Road Services, Inc., a towing and transport company, from October 1999 to April 2003. From December 1997 to October 1999, Mr. Riordan was engaged in private investment opportunities. From October 1996 to December 1997, Mr. Riordan was President and Chief Operating Officer of Ryder TRS, Inc., a truck rental company. From 1993 to October 1996, Mr. Riordan served as President of Ryder Consumer Truck Rental, and was also President of Ryder Student Transportation Services from 1995 to 1996.
Patric T. SiniscalchiMr. Siniscalchi, age 57, will be Senior Vice President and General Manager, International Operations. Mr. Siniscalchi has been General Manager of International Operations for Avis Budget Car Rental LLC since November, 2002. Mr. Siniscalchi was General Manager of International Operations for Avis from 2000 through November 2002. From 1988 through 2000, Mr. Siniscalchi was Vice President, International Operations for Avis.during his tenure.

Name

Biographical Information

Karen C. Sclafani

Ms. Sclafani, age 55, has been Executive Vice President and General Counsel since April 2006. Ms. Sclafani was Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Avis Budget Car Rental, LLC from November 2002 to April 2006. Ms. Sclafani was previously Senior Vice President and General Counsel of Avis since August 1998. Prior to being appointed General Counsel, Ms. Sclafani served as Vice President and Deputy General Counsel and in various other capacities in Avis’ legal department. Before joining Avis, she was a corporate associate with the law firm Mudge, Rose, Guthrie and Alexander in New York City.

Mark J. Servodidio

Mr. Servodidio, age 41, has been Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resource Officer since April 2006. Mr. Servodidio was Executive Vice President, Human Resources for Avis Budget Car Rental, LLC from November 2002 to April 2006. He joined Avis in April 2001 as Senior Vice President, Human Resources. Prior to joining Avis, Mr. Servodidio was with Kraft Foods, Inc. (formerly Nabisco) from 1996 to 2001 where he was most recently head of Human Resources for Nabisco’s sales and supply chain unit. Prior thereto, he served in various leadership roles at PepsiCo, Inc.

John T. McClain

  Mr. McClain, age 45, will behas been Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer upon completion of the Wyndham Worldwide distribution.since July 2006. Mr. McClain has beenwas Senior Vice President, Finance and Corporate Controller of the Company sincefrom September 1999.1999 to July 2006. From May 1998 to September 1999, Mr. McClain was Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Sirius Satellite Radio. Previously, Mr. McClain was Assistant Controller and Director of Accounting of ITT Corporation. Prior to joining ITT Corporation, McClain was an audit manager with Arthur Andersen & Co.

Patric T. Siniscalchi

Mr. Siniscalchi, age 57, has been Executive Vice President, International Operations since August 2006. Mr. Siniscalchi was Senior Vice President, International Operations for Avis Budget Car Rental, LLC from November 2002 to August 2006. Mr. Siniscalchi joined Avis in 1979 and advanced to hold a number of positions of increasing responsibility during his tenure.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND OTHER INFORMATION

Summary Compensation TableDiscussion and Analysis

Compensation Philosophy

We believe that attracting, retaining and incentivizing the best possible management are critical to the success of our business. Our compensation philosophy reflects this belief. We seek to populate our management ranks, and particularly our executive-level positions, with persons with outstanding capabilities, strong commitment to our business and a drive to add value. Our compensation policies and practices are intended to reward individuals for the application of their capabilities for the benefit of our Company. We do this with an intense focus on performance, an awareness of competitive practices and competing alternatives for management talent, an understanding that there can be trade-offs among various objectives and unintended consequences due to factors outside of management’s control, and a belief that discretion and judgment are required to address compensation issues appropriately.

Background—Cendant Separation

During the course of 2006, our company underwent a transformation that included the disposition of former businesses that together represented approximately 70% of our revenue for 2005, as then reported. As a result, on August 23, 2006, following the consummation of the separation, nearly all of our executive officers, including our former Chief Executive Officer, Henry R. Silverman, ceased to provide services to our company in any capacity and new executive officers were appointed. In addition, only four of our then current directors continued to serve on our Board of Directors following completion of the separation and hence the Compensation Committee, which was comprised of Mr. Smith (Chairman) and Mses. Biblowit and Rosenberg (the “Cendant Compensation Committee”), was reconstituted and now consists of Mses. Rosenberg (Chair) and Krominga, and Mr. Coleman (the “Avis Budget Compensation Committee” or the “Compensation Committee”).

Due to the number of complex transactions and arrangements which were required to complete the Cendant Separation, our senior corporate management was required to assume significant additional responsibilities. These transactions and arrangements included the spin-offs of two large companies (Realogy and Wyndham), the sale of another large company (Travelport), numerous new financing transactions, amendments to existing financing arrangements, agreements governing relationships among the separated entities following the separation, transition services and tax sharing arrangements, and internal reorganizations. In connection with the completion of the Cendant Separation, certain members of Cendant’s senior management became part of senior management of Avis Budget, Realogy, Wyndham and Travelport, while others did not. In recognition of the commitment and focus necessary to complete the Cendant Separation and to transform our company from a real estate and travel services company to a pure-play vehicle rental services company, severance or retention payments were made to certain members of senior management (including certain of our named executive officers) and certain previously granted equity awards were canceled while others vested on an accelerated basis.

Given its size and complexity, Cendant had a distinct and separate executive compensation policy compared to Avis Budget’s policy, although the material elements and many of the objectives of the two policies are similar. As is generally the case with Avis Budget, the objectives of Cendant’s program included aligning the interests of executive officers with long-term interests of stockholders; providing highly-competitive levels of compensation conditioned, in large part, on the attainment of specific performance targets and/or stock price appreciation; and attracting, motivating and retaining excellent executive talent for the benefit of stockholders. The Cendant Compensation Committee recognized that by attracting and retaining outstanding management talent and by promoting a culture of energy, entrepreneurialism, competitiveness and dedication to facilitate the attainment of annual growth and profitability targets, the interests of Cendant and its stockholders were best served. The material elements of Cendant’s executive compensation program included base salary, annual profit sharing bonus and long-term equity incentive awards. Cendant from time to time engaged the services of compensation consultant Frederick W. Cook & Company to advise on market rates of compensation for similarly

situated executive officers and to gain a deeper understanding of competition in local and global labor markets to assure that Cendant’s compensation was competitive and provided appropriate incentive and retention value. Frederick W. Cook & Company provided advice regarding our current CEO’s 2006 compensation and employment agreement. Avis Budget has engaged PayCraft Consulting as its compensation consultant as further discussed below.

Differences between Cendant and Avis Budget

The most significant difference between the Cendant and Avis Budget executive compensation policies is that Avis Budget targets a lower amount of total compensation for named executive officers compared to Cendant. This difference is driven largely by the competitive compensation levels at comparable companies, which have been selected based on the revenue size of Avis Budget rather than Cendant. In recognition of the transformation of Cendant, now Avis Budget, to a smaller and less complex entity, the Avis Budget Compensation Committee has taken measures to substantially reduce the aggregate amount of compensation to be paid to the Avis Budget named executive officers and directors compared to Cendant’s named executive officers and directors. For example:

base salary and target bonus ($1 million and 150% of base salary) for Avis Budget’s current Chief Executive Officer are approximately 70% and 88% lower, respectively, versus base salary and bonus paid to Cendant’s Chief Executive Officer for 2005 ($3.3 million and $12.3 million);

average base salaries for the other current Avis Budget Group named executive officers ($472,500) are approximately 38% lower than base salaries paid to Cendant’s other named executive officers in 2005 ($762,500);

the Avis Budget Compensation Committee has approved fewer perquisites and benefits to be offered to the Avis Budget named executive officers compared to those offered to the Cendant named executive officers prior to the separation; and

the Avis Budget Governance Committee approved decreases to director compensation following completion of the Cendant Separation, including a decrease in the annual retainer of approximately 22% compared to Cendant’s annual retainer.

We estimate that, in 2007, compensation for our five named executive officers and directors in the aggregate will represent less than one-half of one percent of our expenses.

Executive Compensation Program Objectives

As stated above, the objectives of the Avis Budget compensation program remain relatively unchanged from Cendant’s compensation program. The primary objectives of our executive compensation programs are to:

facilitate the attraction and retention of key executive talent critical to our long-term success,

tie a significant portion of executives’ compensation to the performance of our company, including both short- and long-term performance, and

align compensation with stockholder interests.

Components of the Executive Compensation Program

The key components of our executive compensation program and their primary objectives are as follows:

Pay ComponentObjectives

Base Salary

•       Primary reward for execution of job responsibilities:

•       Reflects the scope of job responsibilities

•       Reflects consistent, strong individual performance over time

•       Reflects competitive compensation compared to comparable companies

Annual Cash Incentives

•       Primary reward for annual results:

•       Company, department, and individual results

•       Measured against quantitative and qualitative goals; primarily tied to financial measures

•       Places a significant portion of named executive officers pay “at risk” based on annual results

Long-term Incentives (Equity)

•       Primary reward for long-term results:

•       Company stock price performance determines how much the executive can earn

•       Alignment with stockholder interests

•       Provides Avis Budget with a strong long-term retention strategy

Other Benefits/Perquisites

•       Competitive and industry-specific rewards:

•       Attract and retain top talent through industry-specific and competitive benefits and perquisites

Process for Determining Level and Mix of Executive Compensation

To meet our executive compensation objectives as outlined above, the target amount of total direct compensation (which is comprised of base salary, target annual cash incentives and target long-term incentives) and the amount of total direct compensation actually earned should be both competitive and consistent with company performance.

To ensure competitive target total direct compensation, we conduct an annual review of total direct compensation provided at companies of comparable revenue size. Data are obtained from several published national surveys and compiled by PayCraft Consulting, our compensation consultant. These surveys present compensation data for over 1,000 companies sized according to revenue, assets and number of employees. Based upon advice of our compensation consultant, we believe generally that revenue is the most appropriate measure by which to select comparable companies for purposes of benchmarking our target total direct compensation although, for certain positions, we also consider the size and complexity of our balance sheet.

Data for total cash compensation (which is limited to base salary and target annual cash incentives) and total direct compensation for senior executive positions are collected to benchmark total cash compensation and total direct compensation paid to our executives. In each case we target the 50th and 75th percentile, respectively. These data are also considered to develop the weighting for the different components of compensation. After reviewing survey data, we also consider other factors such as individual performance, particularly if that performance exceeds expectations, increased responsibilities or expanded position scope and our ability to replace the individual, to determine the appropriate target total direct compensation for each individual executive position. In establishing our perquisites and benefits and stock ownership guidelines, we considered, based upon

advice of our compensation consultant, relevant data of a peer group, which for 2006 was comprised of approximately ten public companies of comparable revenue size in the car rental, airline, hospitality and specialty retail industries, because survey data do not typically provide detailed information with respect to these items. We have chosen this peer group because we believe that these companies operate in a like manner to Avis Budget, in most cases operate in the travel industry and in general compete for talent with the same skill set. At targeted levels of performance, as much as 80% of total direct compensation at the senior executive level is represented by variable pay (which consists of target annual cash incentives and target long-term incentives) so as to align compensation with stockholder value. The proportion of variable pay versus base salary, and therefore the amount of target total direct compensation at risk, varies by level in the organization. Where executives have the most opportunity to impact financial and operational performance of Avis Budget, a greater portion of total direct compensation is represented by variable pay, especially long-term incentives.

Overall, our outside consultant has determined that:

target total direct compensation is competitive;

base salaries are generally at the median of comparable companies;

target annual cash incentives are slightly above the median of comparable companies; and

target long-term incentives are between the median and the 75th percentile of comparable companies.

The variation from our targeted benchmarks is due to our desire to manage the dilutive effect of our long-term incentives on our outstanding shares by shifting a portion of total direct compensation from long-term compensation to annual cash incentives. Over time, we expect that our target annual cash incentives will be closer to the median of comparable companies than is currently the case and that our target long-term incentives will be closer to the 75th percentile.

Process for Determining Compensation Delivered and the Impact of Performance

Base Salaries

The following table sets forthsalaries of named executive officers currently employed by us are reviewed on an annual basis as well as at the 2003, 2004time of a promotion or other change in responsibility. Increases in salary are based on an evaluation of the individual’s performance against pre-established objectives. Merit increases, if warranted, typically occur in late March each year.

2006 Base Salary Decisions

Each of the five Avis Budget named executive officers who are currently employed received merit increases to their base salaries in 2006 and all of these named executive officers, other than our Chief Accounting Officer, received an increase to reflect either a change in position as a result of the Cendant Separation or the assumption of public company responsibilities.

2007 Base Salary Decisions

No merit increases are expected to base salaries in 2007 for our Chief Executive Officer; President; and Chief Financial Officer. A merit increase of 3.5% was awarded in the first quarter of 2007 for the other two Avis Budget named executive officers.

Annual Incentive Awards

2006 Annual Incentive Decisions

Cendant Retention Program

In 2005, in connection with the Cendant Separation, the Cendant Compensation Committee approved implementation of certain retention programs in order to provide financial incentives for key employees to remain with Cendant through the separation and to assure Cendant’s continuing business operations during the separation process. These programs included both cash bonuses that would be paid to designated key employees so long as those employees remained employed until the completion of both of the Realogy and non-cash compensation awardedWyndham distributions. Designated employees included those individuals who were expected to or earned by each person who served aslose their jobs in connection with the Cendant Separation, but primarily included individuals whose position, duties and responsibilities were deemed critical to continuing business operations while at the same time incurring additional duties and responsibilities relating to separating the various companies.

Under this program, the Cendant Compensation Committee approved the payment of retention bonuses to certain of our named executive officers. In the case of our current Chief Executive Officer and our current Chief Financial Officer who were previously the President and Chief Financial Officer, and the Treasurer, respectively, of Cendant, in addition to ensuring their continued focus and attention during the separation process, these retention bonuses also represented compensation for assuming their additional Avis Budget responsibilities (in addition to their existing responsibilities) on or prior to January 1, 2006. In the case of our current Chief Executive Officer, the retention bonus also represented compensation for assuming additional responsibilities as interim chief executive officer of Cendant’s Travel Distribution business through May 2006 and entering into non-competition arrangements with the separated companies. As part of this retention program, the Cendant Compensation Committee approved revisions to the outstanding equity awards for all current employees as follows: (i) all outstanding equity awards that would vest subject to the attainment of “above-target” performance goals would terminate and (ii) all other outstanding equity awards would vest on August 15, 2006.

2006 Annual Incentive Awards

Cendant named executive officers were entitled to annual performance bonuses based upon the terms of their respective employment agreements, with bonus targets for each such officer, other than Cendant’s Chief Executive Officer, equal to 200% of earned base salary in the applicable fiscal year. Cendant’s Chief Executive Officer’s bonus target was based on a formula comprised of two components which were subject to Cendant’s attainment of performance goals relating to its average growth in adjusted diluted earnings per share and pre-tax income as defined in his employment agreement in effect prior to the separation.

Bonus payments for Cendant named executive officers, other than Cendant’s Chief Executive Officer, were subject to the approval of the Cendant Compensation Committee and based upon the performance of the Company during 2005and/or the applicable business units managed by the officer, as well as such other performance criteria determined by the Company in connection its overall strategic plans. Performance was measured against pre-established performance goals and the four other most highly compensatedofficer’s individual performance subjectively determined by Cendant’s Chief Executive Officer. Those officers who became executive officers solely following the Cendant Separation were generally entitled to annual performance bonuses on a similar basis, although the targets were lower.

In connection with this past practice and as a result of the Company (the “NamedCendant Separation, the Avis Budget Compensation Committee discussed and approved in the first quarter of 2007 discretionary bonus payouts for the five Avis Budget named executive officers who are currently employed. These bonuses represent (i) approximately 25% of the 2006 annual incentive target for our current Chief Executive Officers”):Officer (based on a 200% target prior to the separation and 150% following the separation) and (ii) 50% of the 2006 annual incentive target for each of our other Avis Budget named executive officers (calculated on a similar pro rated basis as for

our Chief Executive Officer). In determining these discretionary bonus payouts, the Avis Budget Compensation Committee considered the 2006 performance of our vehicle rental business, the additional duties assumed by the Avis Budget named executive officers to establish Avis Budget as a stand-alone public vehicle rental company and the number of legacy issues that required attention following the completion of the separation, and for our Chief Executive Officer, compensation attributable to pre-separation services paid during 2006. For our President and Chief Operating Officer, this discretionary bonus represented the only bonus paid for his service in 2006.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE2007 Annual Incentive Plan Decisions

Each of our currently active named executive officers is eligible to earn an annual performance incentive under the 2007 Management Incentive Plan (“2007 MIP”). In the first quarter of 2007, when the Board reviewed our business plan, the Compensation Committee reviewed and approved the financial criteria and targets required to achieve the targeted levels of incentive payout under the 2007 MIP. These financial criteria and targets are consistent with the criteria and targets used in setting the business plan for our domestic and international vehicle rental operations. At the same time, incentive targets were established by the Compensation Committee for each participant in the plan and expressed as a percentage of base salary earned.

Management provided the Compensation Committee with the financial criteria and targets used to determine the level of payouts under the 2007 MIP and management’s rationale as to why these targets are appropriate. The Compensation Committee reviewed the criteria and targets with our compensation consultant and management and approved the threshold, target and maximum levels of financial performance under the plan and the potential payouts at those levels of performance. The Compensation Committee and we believe these financial targets are rigorous but reasonably attainable. The threshold, target and maximum payout levels for each of our named executive officers are set forth below:

Executive

  Incentive Thresholds
(% of Base Salary Earned)
  Incentive Targets
(% of Base Salary Earned)
  Incentive Maximums
(% of Base Salary Earned)
 

Chief Executive Officer

  75% 150% 225%

President and Chief Operating Officer

  50% 100% 150%

Chief Financial Officer

  50% 100% 150%

Chief Human Resource Officer

  37.5% 75% 112.5%

Chief Accounting Officer

  22.5% 45% 67.5%

Actual awards under the 2007 Management Incentive Plan are based on the following components, with the following weightings:

Pre-Tax Margin, which is defined as pre-tax income excluding any separation, restructuring or unusual items, divided by revenue (30%);

Return on Invested Capital (ROIC), which is defined as pretax income, excluding any separation, restructuring or unusual items, plus gross interest expense divided by average stockholders’ equity plus corporate debt (30%);

Total Revenue (15%); and

Discretionary (25%).

By combining these measures, we believe the 2007 MIP emphasizes the importance of balancing growth and profitability. Each component of the 2007 MIP (other than the discretionary component) provides for a threshold payout of 50% (assuming minimum financial performance is attained) and a maximum target payout of 150%. The discretionary component allows for a payout of 0% to 150% and is based on the individual achievement of departmental and organizational objectives set by the Chief Executive Officer or by the Board in the case of the Chief Executive Officer.

Long-term Incentive Plan

Introduction

The Long-term Incentive Plan is designed to link executive rewards with stockholder value over time as well as to promote long-term retention. Prior years’ grants have included stock-settled stock appreciation rights (“SSARs”), restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and, prior to the Cendant Separation, stock options.

Annually, the Compensation Committee approves the total dollar amount of long-term incentives to be granted, individual grants to employees, and the type of equity to be granted. The following factors are reviewed each year to determine the appropriate type of equity to be granted: desired risk/reward ratio, retention risk, potential dilution from equity plans, projected expense and, as described above, practices at comparable companies.

2006 Long-term Incentive Decisions

On May 2, 2006, the Cendant Compensation Committee approved the grant of incentive awards to Avis Budget employees at the director level and above (other than our current Chief Executive Officer). Time-vesting Restricted Stock Units were chosen as the primary equity compensation vehicle because of their higher retentive value, recognizing the greater retention risk due to the uncertainty created by the Cendant Separation, and to provide the management team with a significant stake in the long-term future of Avis Budget. On May 2, 2006, the Cendant Compensation Committee also approved grants of performance-based incentive awards to our current President and our current Chief Financial Officer to be split equally between SSARs and performance-based RSUs and on June 26, 2006 the same performance-based incentive awards were approved for our current Chief Executive Officer. The performance-based RSUs will vest subject to attainment of pre-established financial performance goals, which are based on the compound annual growth rate in earnings before income taxes (75% weighting) and growth in off-airport revenue (25% weighting). Earnings before income taxes is defined to be income before income taxes from continuing operations, excluding separation costs, accounting changes and the impact of significant corporate transactions.

Vesting of these awards is as follows:

 

Type of Award

Executives Receiving Award

Vesting

Time-Based RSUs

All named executive officers other than Chief Executive Officer25% per year, subject to continued employment

Name and

Principal PositionPerformance-Based RSUs

  YearChief Executive Officer  Annual CompensationLong Term Compensation

All Other
Compensation

($)(6)

50% on July 31, 2008 and two equal installments on July 31, 2009 and 2010, subject to attainment of pre-established performance goals
Salary ($)(1)Bonus
($)(2)

Other Annual
Compensation

($)(3)

Restricted Stock

Awards ($)(4)

Securities

Underlying Options/
SARs (#)(5)

Henry R. Silverman
Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive
Officer

2005
2004
2003
3,300,000
3,300,000
3,300,000
12,316,600
15,281,508
13,787,520
100,374
325,843
121,001
0
0
0
0
0
0
6,600,496
5,089,340
5,604,524

James E. Buckman
Vice Chairman and
General CounselPerformance-Based RSUs

  2005
2004
2003

President

Chief Financial Officer

  762,500
762,500
762,500
1,470,328
1,969,703
1,372,500
—  
—  
—  
3,000,000
3,000,000
1,046,475
0
0
0
222,928
142,828
132,900July 31, 2009, subject to attainment of pre-established performance goals

Ronald L. Nelson(7)
President and Chief
Financial Officer;
Chairman and CEO,
Vehicle RentalSSARS

  2005
2004
2003Chief Executive Officer
  762,500
762,500
488,461
1,331,233
2,296,233
976,923
761,842
278,611
163,002
8,000,002
4,000,000
0
0
0
1,042,490
223,583
285,088
110,79425% per year, subject to continued employment

Stephen P. Holmes
Chairman and CEO,
Travel Content
DivisionSSARS

  2005
2004
2003
762,500
762,500
762,500
1,465,128
2,105,128
1,437,400
—  
87,185
—  
5,000,009
4,000,000
1,453,442
0
0
0
216,478
136,983
136,794

Richard A. Smith
Chairman and CEO,
Real Estate Services
DivisionPresident

Chief Financial Officer

  2005
2004
2003
762,500
762,500
762,500
1,481,582
2,171,582
1,565,794
73,863
—  
—  
5,000,009
4,000,000
1,685,997
0
0
0
211,902
254,182
51,366July 31, 2009, subject to continued employment

The awards described above represent the total equity awards granted by Avis Budget to any named executive officer in 2006. Cendant named executive officers who would not be employed with us following the separation did not receive an Avis Budget equity award in 2006.

In connection with valuing the grants of equity awards, it is our policy to use, as the grant or strike price for any stock-based compensation vehicle, the closing price of our stock on the date the Compensation Committee

approves the equity grant except in circumstances where, upon the advice of counsel, our Compensation Committee determines that a separate date should be used, in which case the Compensation Committee, upon advice of counsel, shall determine that date. The Compensation Committee approves awards solely at pre-established quarterly meetings.

2007 Long-term Incentive Decisions

On January 31, 2007, the Avis Budget Compensation Committee approved a grant of incentive awards to Avis Budget employees at the director level and above. For our Chief Executive Officer, the award consists entirely of performance-based RSUs; for our President and our Chief Financial Officer, the award consists of 65% performance-based RSUs and 35% time-based RSUs; for our Chief Human Resource Officer, the award consists of 50% performance-based RSUs and 50% time-based RSUs; and for our Chief Accounting Officer, the award consists of 30% performance-based RSUs and 70% time-based RSUs. The performance-based RSUs will vest, subject to attainment of pre-established financial performance goals based on earnings before income taxes per share, EBIT return on capital and EBITDA margin attainment. These financial measures were selected based on the Company’s long-term strategy for profitability and margin enhancement. The time-based RSUs will vest ratably over four years, subject to the holders’ continued employment with us. The following number of shares were granted to our Chief Executive Officer, our President, our Chief Financial Officer, our Chief Human Resource Officer and our Chief Accounting Officer, respectively: 77,399, 98,685, 65,790, 32,895 and 11,610. In determining the amount of each award, the Avis Budget Compensation Committee considered our compensation philosophy discussed above, the additional duties assumed by the Avis Budget named executive officers to establish Avis Budget as a stand-alone public vehicle rental company and the number of legacy issues that required attention following the completion of the separation, and for our Chief Executive Officer, compensation attributable to pre-separation services paid during 2006.

Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines

Executive stock ownership guidelines for Cendant required senior officers to acquire and hold designated levels of Cendant common stock. Under these guidelines the named executive officers were required to own Cendant common stock with a value equal to six times base salary for the Chief Executive Officer and three times base salary for the other named executive officers by October 2007. The Avis Budget Compensation Committee reviewed these guidelines and adopted revised executive stock ownership guidelines in the first quarter of 2007 to continue Cendant’s policy of encouraging executives to acquire a significant level of direct ownership. The revised ownership guidelines are intended to be consistent with competitive practice, and realistic given the level of cash and equity compensation.

Under these revised guidelines, the Chief Executive Officer is required to retain 100%, and other named executive officers who report to the Chief Executive Officer are required to retain a minimum of 50% of the net shares (net of exercise price and taxes) upon the exercise of stock options or stock appreciation rights or the vesting of restricted stock awards until reaching specified ownership thresholds of four times base salary for our Chief Executive Officer, two times base salary for our President and our Chief Financial Officer and one times base salary for all other named executive officers who directly report to our Chief Executive Officer. Given the mandatory hold provision until thresholds are obtained, we have removed the deadline for achieving those thresholds. Stock ownership is defined to include stock owned by the executive directly (due to personal purchases of stock in the open market), stock owned indirectly through the Company’s savings plan, unrestricted (i.e., vested) stock awards or units, and the “in-the-money” value of vested stock options and stock appreciation rights. Following attainment of ownership thresholds our named executive officers will be required to hold 50% of the net shares obtained upon the vesting of any equity award for one year.

Employment and Change of Control Agreements; Severance Arrangements

For many years, Cendant had followed the practice of entering into a written employment agreement with its Chief Executive Officer and those who reported to him directly, including Cendant’s President and Chief

Financial Officer. Consistent with this practice, we entered into an employment agreement with our current Chief Executive Officer; President; and Chief Financial Officer in 2006 in connection with the completion of the Cendant Separation. These agreements allow us, among other things, to obtain post-employment non-competition covenants from these executive officers. A detailed description of these employment agreements is set forth under the heading “Employment Agreements and Other Arrangements”.

We consider it essential to the best interests of our stockholders to foster the continued employment of key management personnel. Thus, we have also entered into severance agreements with the two Avis Budget named executive officers who do not have written employment agreements. In these agreements, the Company seeks to provide appropriate protections to members of management that are consistent with prevailing market practices.

The benefits that would be received by the Avis Budget named executive officers in the event of termination without cause or a change in control are set forth under the heading “Termination, Severance and Change of Control Arrangements”.

Perquisites and Benefits

Recognizing that Avis Budget Group is a smaller and less complex company than Cendant, the Avis Budget Compensation Committee has taken steps to ensure that the material elements of the Avis Budget compensation program are appropriate. In addition to lower target total direct compensation previously discussed, the Avis Budget Compensation Committee also made several changes to reduce the number of perquisites and benefits available to Avis Budget named executive officers compared to the Cendant named executive officers. Effective January 1, 2007, we have eliminated the executive life insurance benefit formerly provided to our Chief Executive Officer; the VIP medical expense reimbursement plan; and the medical expense reimbursement plan. In addition, we eliminated, effective upon completion of the Cendant Separation, the car and driver provided to our former Chief Executive Officer and reduced personal use of the company aircraft.

Therefore, as of January 1, 2007, our perquisites consist primarily of financial planning services, auto use and personal use of company aircraft services (limited to our Chief Executive Officer; our President; and our Chief Financial Officer). We will continue to review our compensation and benefit programs to ensure that we remain competitive with comparable companies and are able to attract and retain highly qualified senior executives.

Pre- and Post-Separation Compensation Tables

Named Executive Officers

Following this Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation information for 2006 is set forth for our named executive officers who are as follows:

Mr. Silverman, Cendant’s former Principal Executive Officer, who ceased to serve in any capacity with Avis Budget following the completion of the Cendant Separation. All amounts described below for Mr. Silverman represent compensation for his role as Chief Executive Officer of Cendant prior to the separation. For 2005, Cendant generated approximately $18 billion in revenue and until the separation operated significant real estate, hospitality and travel distribution businesses in addition to the vehicle rental business. All amounts described in the tables and disclosure that follow this Compensation Discussion and Analysis for Mr. Silverman also represent all of the obligations owing to Mr. Silverman under any arrangement with us.

Mr. Nelson, our Principal Executive Officer and Cendant’s former President and Principal Financial Officer. Mr. Nelson ceased to serve as Cendant’s Principal Financial Officer and became our Principal Executive Officer upon completion of the Separation.

Mr. Wyshner, our Principal Financial Officer, who prior to the Cendant Separation was Executive Vice President and Treasurer of Cendant.

Messrs. Salerno, McClain and Servodidio, our three most highly compensated Avis Budget Group executive officers as of December 31, 2006 other than Messrs. Nelson and Wyshner.

Messrs. Buckman and Holmes, two additional individuals who served as executive officers during 2006, and ceased to serve in any capacity with Avis Budget following completion of the Cendant Separation. Their total 2006 compensation would otherwise have made them one of the three most highly compensated executives (other than Messrs. Silverman, Nelson and Wyshner) for 2006.

Compensation Information

The compensation information included following this Compensation Discussion and Analysis is presented on a combined basis for service attributable to both the periods during 2006 that preceded and followed the Cendant Separation. The tables set forth immediately below divide into pre-separation (i.e. Cendant) named executive officers and post-separation (i.e. Avis Budget) named executive officers. The tables also present compensation information for each named executive officer for service attributable to pre- and post-separation periods, as applicable. All of this compensation is further described below in the compensation tables following this Compensation Discussion and Analysis and is presented on a combined basis.

We believe it is important to provide this supplemental information to illustrate the portion of compensation presented that is attributable to services provided by each named executive officer (in such capacity) to Cendant, a real estate and travel services company with reported revenue of over $18 billion in 2005 and Avis Budget, a pure-play vehicle rental services company with reported revenue in 2006 of approximately $5.6 billion. We also believe it is important to provide this supplemental information given the different policies and Compensation Committee membership for Avis Budget and Cendant as described above at the beginning of this Compensation Discussion and Analysis.

Pre-Separation Compensation

Name and Principal Position

 Period Salary
($)
 Bonus
($)
 Stock
Awards
 Option
Awards
 Change in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
 All Other
Comp
($)
 Total
($)

Silverman, Henry R.
Former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Cendant

 Pre-*
Separation
2006
 1,916,539 0 0 0 0 62,711,338 64,627,877

Nelson, Ronald L.
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer, Avis Budget/Former President and Chief Financial Officer, Cendant

 Pre-
Separation
2006
 439,904 4,096,233 5,936,728 0 0 3,095,459 13,568,324

Buckman, James E.
Former Vice Chairman and General Counsel, Cendant

 Pre-
Separation
2006
 442,837 135,328 2,366,985 0 0 7,730,852 10,676,002

Holmes, Stephen P.
Former Chairman & Chief Executive Officer, Travel Content Division, Cendant

 Pre-
Separation
2006
 439,904 80,128 3,579,431 0 0 1,599,108 5,698,571

(1)*Mr. Silverman’s base salary was increased to $3.3 million in July 2002 and has not increased thereafter. Each other Named Executive Officer has been subject to a base salary freeze since 2003.January 1, 2006–August 23, 2006

Post Separation Compensation

Name and Principal Position

 Period Salary
($)
 Bonus
($)
 Stock
Awards
 Option
Awards
 Change in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
 All Other
Comp
($)
 Total
($)

Mr. Nelson

 Post-*
Separation
2006
 423,077 395,434 444,444 400,000 0 69,959 1,732,914

Wyshner, David B.
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer

 Post-
Separation
2006
 222,115 245,673 435,897 102,564 0 46,861 1,053,110

Salerno, F. Robert
President & Chief Operating Officer

 Post-
Separation
2006
 296,154 330,435 705,128 205,128 4,314 56,762 1,597,921

McClain, John T.
Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer

 Post-
Separation
2006
 133,269 115,977 100,000 0 0 22,535 371,781

Servodidio, Mark
Executive Vice President & Chief Human Resource Officer

 Post-
Separation
2006
 148,077 172,341 166,667 0 0 20,954 508,039

*August 23, 2006–December 31, 2006

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Avis Budget Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and, based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.

THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Sheli Z. Rosenberg, Chairman

Leonard S. Coleman

Lynn Krominga

Summary Compensation Table

The following table summarizes the total compensation of all of our named executive officers for 2006.

Name and Principal
Position(a)

 Year Salary
($)(b)
 Bonus
($)(c)
 Stock
Awards
($)(d)
 Option
Awards
($)(e)
 Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
 

Change in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings

($)(f)

 

All Other
Comp

($)(g)

 Total
($)

Silverman, Henry R.
Former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Cendant

 2006 1,916,539 0 0 0 0 0 62,711,338 64,627,877

Nelson, Ronald L.
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer, Avis Budget/Former President and Chief Financial Officer, Cendant

 2006 862,981 4,491,667 6,381,172 400,000 0 0 3,165,418 15,301,238

Wyshner, David B.
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer

 2006 491,346 793,681 1,364,874 102,564 0 0 89,728 2,842,193

Salerno, F. Robert
President & Chief Operating Officer

 2006 660,871 330,435 1,961,443 205,128 0 10,353 90,778 3,259,008

McClain, John T.
Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer

 2006 313,154 315,977 574,246 0 0 0 48,539 1,251,916

Servodidio, Mark
Executive Vice President & Chief Human Resource Officer

 2006 333,167 172,341 667,562 0 0 0 35,814 1,208,884

Buckman, James E.
Former Vice Chairman and General Counsel, Cendant

 2006 442,837 135,328 2,366,985 0 0 0 7,730,852 10,676,002

Holmes, Stephen P.
Former Chairman & Chief Executive Officer, Travel Content Division, Cendant

 2006 439,904 80,128 3,579,431 0 0 0 1,599,108 5,698,571

(2)(a)

For 2005, bonus amounts include fiscal year 2005 profit-sharing bonusesAs discussed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, prior to the completion of the Cendant Separation, Mr. Nelson served as the President and Chief Financial Officer and a Director of Cendant and the other Avis Budget named executive officers served in various other capacities at Cendant and/or its vehicle rental business.

(b)Base salaries for 2007 were approved by the Avis Budget Compensation Committee in first quarter 2007 as follows: $1,000,000, $525,000, $700,000, $315,000 and paid$350,000 for Messrs. Nelson, Wyshner, Salerno, McClain and Servodidio, respectively, which represent no increase over salaries for such persons as of the date of the completion of the Cendant Separation, other than an increase of 3.5% for Messrs. McClain and Servodidio. Salary includes amounts deferred under the Cendant Corporation 2006 Deferred Compensation Plan as follows: Mr. Nelson, $51,779; Mr. Wyshner, $29,481; Mr. Salerno, $39,652; and Mr. McClain, $18,789. This plan was replaced with the Avis Budget Group, Inc. 2006 Deferred Compensation Plan following the Cendant Separation.
(c)

Bonus amounts include discretionary payouts as discussed in the first quarter of 2006. For each Named Executive Officer (other than Mr. Silverman), 2005 bonusCompensation Discussion and Analysis. Bonus amounts include regular annual bonuses providing an opportunity to receive a payment targeted at 200% of base salary (175% for Mr. Buckman), but subject to the Company’s attainment of performance goals (and, as applicable, the performance of the Named Executive Officer’s division)Nelson, Mr. Wyshner, Mr. Servodidio and the personal performance of the Named Executive Officer. See “Executive Compensation and Other Information — Employment Contracts and Termination, Severance and Change of Control Arrangements.” Mr. Silverman’s 2005 profit-sharing bonus was calculated pursuant to his employment agreement, which was amended in 2004 pursuant to the settlement of a stockholder derivative action. AmountsMcClain also include special bonuses for their roles in the execution of the transactions necessary to complete the Cendant Separation and the assumption of additional duties related to the vehicle rental business

while continuing their Cendant responsibilities and, in Mr. Nelson’s case, acting as Chief Executive Officer of Travelport until May 2006. These bonuses totaled $4,000,000 for Mr. Nelson, $500,000 for Mr. Wyshner, $200,000 for Mr. McClain and $60,000 for Mr. Servodidio. Bonus amounts also include deferrals under the Cendant Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan as follows: Mr. Nelson, $197,717; Mr. Salerno, $19,826; Mr. Wyshner, $14,740; Mr. McClain, $3,959; and Mr. Servodidio, $10,340. The bonus amount also includes a special bonus of $96,233 for Mr. Nelson and $135,328 for Mr. Buckman and $80,128 for Mr. Holmes paid to Named Executive Officers (other than Mr. Silverman) duringin the first quarter of 2006 under the Executive Officer Supplemental Life Insurance Program. The followingThis program has been eliminated, effective January 1, 2007. Bonus amounts were paidalso include a discretionary cash payment of $48,008 for Mr. Wyshner and $50,000 for Mr. McClain.

(d)Represents the amount expensed in 2006 in connection with stock awards under SFAS No. 123R. Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in Note 18 to our audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 1, 2007 (“2006 Form 10-K”).
(e)Represents the amount expensed in 2006 in connection with option awards under SFAS No. 123R. Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in Note 18 to our audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, included in our 2006 Form 10-K.
(f)For Mr. Salerno, the reported change in pension value during the year represents the sum of the increased value accumulated in the Avis Rent A Car System Pension Plan and the Avis Rent A Car System Retirement Equalization Benefit Plan.
(g)All Other Compensation includes the personal benefits and perquisites presented in the tables below.

2006 All Other Compensation Table

Name

 Year Tax
Reimbursements
($)(a)
 Deferred
Compensation
Plan
Contributions
($)(b)
 Medical
Expense
Reimbursement
Plan ($)(c)
 Severance
and Other
Benefits
($)(d)
 Perquisites
($)(e)
 Total All
Other
Compensation
($)

Mr. Silverman

 2006 95 83,769 2,800 62,534,206 90,468 62,711,338

Mr. Nelson

 2006 13,074 75,505 4,800 3,000,000 72,039 3,165,418

Mr. Wyshner

 2006 12,762 44,221 720 N/A 32,025 89,728

Mr. Salerno

 2006 1,999 59,478 720 N/A 28,581 90,778

Mr. McClain

 2006 5,690 22,748 720 N/A 19,381 48,539

Mr. Servodidio

 2006 755 21,340 720 N/A 12,999 35,814

Mr. Buckman

 2006 12,941 26,394 4,800 7,635,195 51,522 7,730,852

Mr. Holmes

 2006 11,351 22,875 2,800 1,502,495 59,587 1,599,108

(a)Represents tax payments made on behalf of each named executive officer relating to the Named Executive Officersprovision of financial services disclosed in footnote (b) to the 2006 Perquisites Table below for Mr. Nelson, $7,384; Mr. Salerno, $1,900; Mr. Wyshner, $1,619; Mr. McClain $644; Mr. Servodidio, $674; and Mr. Holmes, $3,663. Also includes tax payments relating to the car leases disclosed in footnote (e) to the 2006 Perquisites Table below for Mr. Nelson, $5,615; Mr. Wyshner, $11,076; Mr. McClain, $4,965; Mr. Buckman, $12,829 and Mr. Holmes $7,583. The total tax reimbursements for each of the named executive officers also include tax payments for nominal company gifts.
(b)Represents Company matching contributions to a non-qualified deferred compensation plan maintained by the Company for the benefit of certain of our officers selected by our Compensation Committee. Under this plan, participants are permitted to defer compensation under the terms of the plan as approved by the Compensation Committee. Amounts deferred by participants, as well as any matching contributions made by the Company, are contributed to a rabbi trust established for the purpose of holding plan assets. Participants may allocate deferrals to one or more deemed investments under the plan, which may include a deemed investment in the Company’s common stock. Matching contributions may be subject to such vesting provisions as determined from time to time; however, all of a participant’s accounts under this program:plan will become fully vested in the event of a change in control (as defined in the officer deferred compensation plan) or in the event that the participant’s service with us terminates as a result of death or disability. A participant in this plan may elect a single lump-sum payment of his or her account, or may elect payments over time; however, the participant’s entire account balance will be paid in a single lump sum following a change in control. For Mr. Servodidio, the defined contribution Plan match contributions include $11,000 of match under the qualified company-sponsored 401(K) saving plan.
(c)The Medical Expenses Reimbursement Plan (MERP) is an employer plan that reimburses a select group of executives for medical expenses related to an annual physical examination, up to a $750 annual maximum, directly from employer funds. For the 2006 plan year, Mr. Salerno, Mr. Wyshner, Mr. McClain and Mr. Servodidio were the named executive officers eligible for the MERP. Under the plan, premiums paid on behalf of Mr. Salerno ($720), Mr. Wyshner ($720), Mr. McClain ($720) and Mr. Servodidio ($720) totaled $2,880. The plan has been eliminated, effective January 1, 2007. The VIP Medical Expense Reimbursement Plan (“VIP MERP”) is an employer plan that reimburses a select group of senior executives (and their dependents) for previously unreimbursed medical expenses, up to a $7,500 annual maximum, through a policy of health or accident insurance. For the 2006 plan year, Mr. Silverman, Mr. Nelson, Mr. Buckman $135,328;and Mr. Holmes were the named executive officers eligible for the VIP MERP. Under the plan, premiums paid on behalf of Mr. Silverman ($2,800), Mr. Nelson ($4,800), Mr. Buckman ($4,800) and Mr. Holmes ($2,800) totaled $15,200. The plan has been eliminated effective January 1, 2007.
(d)

For Mr. Silverman, amount represents payments under his June 2006 Employment Agreement in connection with his termination with Cendant upon completion of the Cendant Separation as follows: a lump sum cash payment of $21,661,254, which is an amount equal to

 

Mr. Nelson $96,233; Mr. Holmes $80,128; and Mr. Smith $96,582. The program is described further in footnote (6) below.

(3)Except where indicated, perquisites and personal benefits are less than the lesser of $50,000 or 10%net present value of the product of (x) the sum of (1) his base salary andplus (2) his annual bonus for each Named Executive Officer2005 multiplied by (y) the number of full and partial years remaining in each year. In 2005,the employment term under Mr. Silverman’s perquisitesCendant Employment Agreement through December 31, 2007; and personal benefits included $49,388a pro rata annual bonus for personal use2006 (based upon his bonus for the preceding fiscal year) in an amount of corporate aircraft and $49,986 for provision of corporate automobiles and drivers; Mr. Nelson’s perquisites and personal benefits included $667,662 for payment or reimbursement of residential relocation expenses (including tax assistance); and Mr. Smith’s perquisites and personal benefits included $26,925 for personal use of corporate aircraft and $27,065 for provision of corporate automobiles (including tax assistance).$6,600,000. In 2004,connection with a settlement with respect to split-dollar insurance policies maintained by Cendant on Mr. Silverman’s perquisiteslife, a payment of $14,570,158 was made to the insurance companies which was necessary to fund the policies. The settlement was designed to maintain the same overall cost to Cendant, on a present value basis, as compared to its costs under the existing split-dollar arrangements. In connection with this settlement, pursuant to the existing split-dollar arrangement, in January 2007, we made a payment to Mr. Silverman of $15,122,409, which is excluded from the amount as such payment represents the amount necessary for Mr. Silverman or his assignee to purchase the policies from us at that time and personal benefits included $102,697such amount was immediately returned to us as the purchase price of the policy. In settlement of our on-going obligation to make annual bonus payments to Mr. Silverman under the split-dollar insurance policies, such amount also includes a cash payment to Mr. Silverman in January 2007 of $19,202,794. We also paid $500,000 to reimburse Mr. Silverman for personal use of corporate and $165,013 for the reimbursement ofall legal fees (including tax assistance) incurred by him in connection with the settlement and the negotiation of hisan employment agreement; Mr. Nelson’sagreement with Realogy.

For Mr. Nelson, amount includes $3,000,000 paid pursuant to agreements between Mr. Nelson and Realogy, Wyndham Worldwide and Travelport which contained non-competition covenants.

For Mr. Buckman, amount represents $7,625,000 in severance benefits under his employment agreement in effect prior to the Cendant Separation in connection with the termination of Mr. Buckman’s employment upon completion of the Cendant Separation and $10,195 in connection with a premium on a $5 million insurance policy.

For Mr. Holmes amount represents $2,495 in connection with a premium for a term life insurance policy and a bonus of $1,500,000 for his role in the execution of the transactions necessary to complete the Cendant Separation.

(e)Represents the 2006 perquisites and personal benefits included $221,914 for payment or reimbursement of residential relocation expenses (including tax assistance); and Mr. Holmes’ perquisites and personal benefits included $42,537 forpresented in the table below.

2006 Perquisites Table

Name

  Year  Personal Use of
Company
Aircraft
($)(a)
  Financial
Services
($)(b)
  Car and/or Car
and Driver
($)(c)
  Charitable
Contributions
($)(d)
  Total 2006
Perquisites
($)(e)

Mr. Silverman

  2006  47,742  0  42,604  0  90,468

Mr. Nelson

  2006  32,137  10,000  19,780  10,000  72,039

Mr. Wyshner

  2006  0  9,250  22,603  N/A  32,025

Mr. Salerno

  2006  12,637  9,750  6,000  N/A  28,581

Mr. McClain

  2006  N/A  6,513  12,659  N/A  19,381

Mr. Servodidio

  2006  N/A  6,790  6,000  N/A  12,999

Mr. Buckman

  2006  32,789  0  18,611  N/A  51,522

Mr. Holmes

  2006  22,634  5,833  10,948  20,000  59,587

(a)Represents personal use of corporate aircraft. In 2003,the Cendant company aircraft in the amount of $47,742 for Mr. Silverman’s perquisitesSilverman, $32,137 for Mr. Nelson, $32,789 for Mr. Buckman and $22,634 for Mr. Holmes, calculated based on the incremental cost to the Company for fuel, trip-related maintenance, crew travel expenses, on-board catering, landing fees, trip-related hangar/parking costs and smaller variables costs. Since the aircraft was used primarily for business travel, fixed costs that do not change based on usage, such as pilots’ salaries, the purchase costs for the company aircraft, and the cost of maintenance not related to trips were not included.

After the Cendant Separation, Avis Budget replaced the company aircraft with leased jet services through NetJet. Under the revised Company Aircraft Policy, Mr. Nelson may use the NetJet services for personal use for a maximum of 16 hours per year. Our President and Chief Operating Officer and our Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer may also use the NetJet services for personal use, at the discretion of Mr. Nelson, for a maximum of 10 hours per year. The incremental cost of personal use of the NetJet services will be calculated based on the flight specific direct operating costs, including standard fuel, maintenance, catering, and landing fees, and miscellaneous fees such as variable fuel surcharge as applicable, international fees for travel outside the U.S., and a 7.5% Federal Excise Tax. Since the aircraft is used primarily for business travel, fixed costs that do not change based on usage, such as pilot salaries, training, hangaring, insurance, and services support will not be included. Only Mr. Salerno used the NetJet services in 2006.

(b)For Mr. Nelson and Mr. Holmes, represents reimbursement for financial services provided by an approved vendor up to a maximum annual reimbursement of $10,000. For the other named executive officers, represents the actual costs we incurred for financial services provided under the AYCO Financial Services program. These services include tax return preparation, financial planning and estate planning.
(c)Represents the cost of a company-provided car under a car lease program with our former PHH subsidiary, including the car lease, insurance, and standard maintenance or incremental cost to the Company for demonstration automobiles provided by our automobile vendors which may be used for business and personal benefitsuse and are part of a vehicle evaluation program. For our former chief executive officer, also represents car and driver provided, however, such perquisite is no longer provided.
(d)Represents discretionary matching contribution made by The Avis Budget Charitable Foundation.
(e)Also includes cost to the company for a nominal company gift.

2006 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

Name*

 Grant
Date
 Approval
Date
 Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards
 Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards
 All Other
Stock
Awards
Number
of Shares
of Stock
or Units
(#)(c)
 All Other
Option
Awards
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)(d)
 Exercise
or Base
Price of
Options
Awards
($/SH)
 Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock and
Option
Awards
($)
   Threshold
($)(a)
 Target
($)(a)
 Maximum
($)(a)
 Threshold
(#)(b)
 Target
(#)(b)
 Maximum
(#)(b)
    

Mr. Nelson

 8/1/2006 6/26/06        337,079 24.40 3,000,000
 8/1/2006 6/26/06 N/A N/A N/A 0 122,951 N/A    3,000,000

Mr. Wyshner

 8/1/2006 5/2/06        54,348 24.40 500,000
 8/1/2006 5/2/06       81,967   2,000,000
 8/1/2006 5/2/06 N/A N/A N/A 0 20,492 N/A    500,000

Mr. Salerno

 8/1/2006 5/2/06        108,696 24.40 1,000,000
 8/1/2006 5/2/06       122,951   3,000,000
 8/1/2006 5/2/06 N/A N/A N/A 0 40,984 N/A    1,000,000

Mr. McClain

 8/1/2006 5/2/06 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 24,590 N/A N/A 600,000

Mr. Servodidio

 8/1/2006 5/2/06 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 40,984 N/A N/A 1,000,000

*Messrs. Silverman, Buckman and Holmes did not receive any equity awards from us in 2006.
(a)A discussion of 2006 annual performance bonuses is included $59,825in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis.
(b)For Mr. Nelson vest one-half on July 31, 2008 and the other half in two equal installments on July 31, 2009 and 2010 and for personal useMessrs. Salerno and Wyshner vest on July 31, 2009, subject to attainment of corporate aircraftperformance goals. For more information regarding these awards, including the applicable performance goals, please see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Long Term Incentive Plan — 2006 Long-Term Incentive Decisions.” The number of RSUs granted to each eligible employee was determined by dividing the award amount by the closing price of our stock on the date of grant, which was the first day of trading following the distributions of Realogy and Wyndham.
(c)Represents awards of time-vested RSUs which will vest in equal installments on each of the first four anniversaries of May 2, 2006, subject to continued employment. The number of RSUs granted to each eligible employee was determined by dividing the award amount by the closing price of our stock on the date of grant, which was the first day of trading following the distributions of Realogy and Wyndham.
(d)Represents SSARs which for Mr. Nelson will vest in equal installments on each of the first four anniversaries of July 31, 2006 subject to continued employment. The SSARs for Mr. Salerno and Mr. Nelson’s perquisitesWyshner will vest on July 31, 2009, subject to continued employment. Upon vesting each executive will have the right, until the seventh anniversary of the grant date, to receive an amount, in common stock, equal to the excess of the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date of exercise over the exercise price of the SSAR. Per the terms of the individual grant awards, the exercise price of the stock-settled stock appreciation rights was based on the closing price of the stock on the date of grant, which was the first day of trading following the distributions of Realogy and personal benefits included $141,747Wyndham.

2006 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table

NAME

 OPTION AWARDS STOCK AWARDS
 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#) Exercisable(a)
 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#) Unexercisable(b)
 Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercisable
Unearned
Options
(#)
 Options
Exercise
Price
($)(c)
 Options
Expiration
Date(d)
 Number of
Shares Or
Units of
Stock that
Have Not
Vested
(#)(e)
 Market
Value of
Shares Or
Units of
Stock that
Have Not
Vested
($)(f)
 Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units Or
Other
Rights
That Have
Not
Vested
(#)(g)
 Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market Or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares, Units
Or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
($)(g)

Mr. Silverman(h)

 105,077   28.771 4/30/2007    

Mr. Silverman

 395,965   14.1158 4/30/2007    

Mr. Silverman

 791,930   28.771 12/17/2007    

Mr. Silverman

 312,747   25.7141 4/21/2009    

Mr. Silverman

 312,747   31.792 1/13/2010    

Mr. Silverman

 625,494   13.5404 1/3/2011    

Mr. Nelson

        122,951 2,666,807

Mr. Nelson(i)

 104,249   18.8163 4/14/2013    

Mr. Nelson

  337,079  24.40 8/1/2013    

Mr. Wyshner

      81,967 1,777,864 20,492 444,471

Mr. Wyshner(j)

 15,637   26.2536 2/10/2009    

Mr. Wyshner

 11,467   31.792 1/13/2010    

Mr. Wyshner

 170   13.5404 1/3/2011    

Mr. Wyshner

 13,511   27.4044 1/22/2012    

Mr. Wyshner

 2,871   33.2593 6/3/2014    

Mr. Wyshner

 3,104   30.0385 4/26/2015    

Mr. Wyshner

  54,348  24.40 8/1/2013    

Mr. Salerno

      122,951 2,666,807 40,984 888,943

Mr. Salerno(k)

 18,244   18.845 3/1/2011    

Mr. Salerno

 36,487   27.4044 1/22/2012    

Mr. Salerno

  108,696  24.40 8/1/2013    

Mr. McClain(l)

 15,637   25.8040 9/27/2009    

Mr. McClain

 7,819   31.792 1/13/2010    

Mr. McClain

 1,433   13.5404 1/3/2011    

Mr. McClain

 7,506   27.4044 1/22/2012    

Mr. McClain

      24,590 533,357  

Mr. Servodidio

      40,984 888,943  

Mr. Servodidio(m)

 8,444   22.9938 4/19/2011    

Mr. Servodidio

 5,004   27.4044 1/22/2012    

Mr. Buckman(n)

 5,149   14.1158 4/30/2007    

Mr. Buckman

 37,742   14.1158 12/17/2007    

Mr. Buckman

 24,286   28.771 12/17/2007    

Mr. Buckman

 32,163   28.771 10/14/2008    

Mr. Buckman

 62,549   25.7141 4/21/2009    

Mr. Buckman

 52,515   31.792 1/13/2010    

Mr. Buckman

 104,249   13.5405 1/3/2011    

Mr. Buckman

 31,275   27.4044 1/22/2012    

Mr. Holmes(o)

 9,415   14.1158 4/30/2007    

Mr. Holmes

 35,136   14.1158 12/17/2007    

Mr. Holmes

 21,680   28.771 12/17/2007    

Mr. Holmes

 33,466   28.771 10/14/2008    

Mr. Holmes

 62,549   25.7141 4/21/2009    

Mr. Holmes

 52,515   31.792 1/13/2010    

Mr. Holmes

 104,249   13.5404 1/3/2011    

Mr. Holmes

 18,243   27.4044 1/22/2012    


(a)Represents fully vested currently exercisable stock options. As a result of the Cendant Separation, the Cendant Compensation Committee approved the accelerated vesting of all outstanding stock options following the spin-off of Wyndham and Realogy.
(b)Represents SSARS which for paymentMr. Nelson will vest in equal installments on each of the first four anniversaries of July 31, 2006, subject to continued employment. The SSARS for Messrs. Salerno and Wyshner will vest on July 31, 2009, subject to continued employment. For additional information, please see footnote (d) of the 2006 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table for terms of these awards.
(c)Represents the fair-market value on the date of the grant as approved by the Cendant Compensation Committee. The original price was adjusted on July 31, 2006, the date of the Realogy and Wyndham spin-offs. The price was then subsequently adjusted in connection with the 1-for-10 reverse stock split of Avis Budget common stock.
(d)Represents the expiration date of the stock option grant, subject to continued employment with Avis Budget, Realogy or reimbursementWyndham, as applicable.
(e)Represents awards of residential relocation expenses (including tax assistance).time-vested RSUs. Terms of these awards are disclosed in footnote (c) to the 2006 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table.
(f)Values are based on the closing price of our common stock on December 29, 2006 of $21.69.
(g)Represents performance-based RSUs. For additional information, see footnote (b) to 2006 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table. Values are based on the closing price of our common stock on December 29, 2006 of $21.69.
(h)In connection with the Cendant Separation, Mr. Silverman received Realogy and Wyndham stock options as follows, all of which are currently exercisable. The number of securities underlying unexercised Realogy options are: 262,691, 989,912, 1,979,824, 781,866, 781,867 and 1,563,734, with exercise prices of $31.61, $15.51, $31.61, $25.25, $34.93, $14.88, respectively, and expiration dates of April 30, 2007, April 30, 2007, December 17, 2007, April 21, 2009, January 13, 2010 and January 3, 2011, respectively. The number of securities underlying unexercised Wyndham options are: 210,153, 791,929, 1,583,859, 625,493, 625,494 and 1,250,986, with exercise prices of $42.03, $20.62, $42.03, $37.56, $46.44, $19.78, respectively, and expiration dates of April 30, 2007, April 30, 2007, December 17, 2007, April 21, 2009, January 13, 2010 and January 3, 2011, respectively.
(i)In connection with the Cendant Separation, Mr. Nelson received Realogy and Wyndham stock options as follows, all of which are currently exercisable. The number of securities underlying unexercised Realogy options are 260,622, with an exercise price of $20.67, and an expiration date of April 14, 2013. The number of securities underlying unexercised Wyndham options are 208,497, with an exercise price of $27.48, and an expiration date of April 14, 2013.
(j)In connection with the Cendant Separation, Mr. Wyshner received Realogy and Wyndham stock options as follows, all of which are currently exercisable. The number of securities underlying unexercised Realogy options are: 39,093, 28,668, 424, 33,776, 7,176, and 7,758, with exercise prices of $28.84, $34.93, $14.88, $30.11, $36.54, $33.00, respectively, and expiration dates of February 10, 2009, January 13, 2010, January 3, 2011, January 22, 2012, June 3, 2014 and April 26, 2015, respectively. The number of securities underlying unexercised Wyndham options are: 31,274, 22,934, 339, 27,021, 5,741, and 6,207, with exercise prices of $38.35, $46.44, $19.78, $40.03, $48.58, $43.88, respectively, and expiration dates of February 10, 2009, January 13, 2010, January 3, 2011, January 22, 2012, June 3, 2014 and April 26, 2015, respectively.
(k)In connection with the Cendant Separation, Mr. Salerno received Realogy and Wyndham stock options as follows, all of which are currently exercisable. The number of securities underlying unexercised Realogy options are: 45,608 and 91,217, with exercise prices of $20.70 and 30.11, respectively, and expiration dates of March 1, 2011 and January 22, 2012, respectively. The number of securities underlying unexercised Wyndham options are: 36,487 and 72,974, with exercise prices of $27.53 and $40.03, respectively, and expiration dates of March 1, 2011 and January 22, 2012, respectively.
(l)In connection with the Cendant Separation, Mr. McClain received Realogy and Wyndham stock options as follows, all of which are currently exercisable. The number of securities underlying unexercised Realogy options are: 39,093, 19,546, 3,583 and 18,764, with exercise prices of $28.35, $34.93, $14.88 and $30.11, respectively, and expiration dates of September 27, 2009, January 13, 2010, January 3, 2011 and January 22, 2012, respectively. The number of securities underlying unexercised Wyndham options are: 31,274, 15,637, 2,866 and 15,011, with exercise prices of $37.69, $46.44, $19.78 and $40.03, respectively, and expiration dates of September 27, 2009, January 13, 2010, January 3, 2011 and January 22, 2012, respectively.
(m)In connection with the Cendant Separation, Mr. Servodidio received Realogy and Wyndham stock options as follows, all of which are currently exercisable. The number of securities underlying unexercised Realogy options are: 21,110 and 12,509, with exercise prices of $25.26 and $30.11, respectively, and expiration dates of April 19, 2011 and January 22, 2012, respectively. The number of securities underlying unexercised Wyndham options are: 16,888 and 10,007, with exercise prices of $33.59 and 40.03, respectively, and expiration dates of April 19, 2011 and January 22, 2012, respectively.
(n)In connection with the Cendant Separation, Mr. Buckman received Realogy and Wyndham stock options as follows, all of which are currently exercisable. The number of securities underlying unexercised Realogy options are: 12,871, 60,715, 94,354, 80,406, 156,373, 131,288, 260,622 and 78,186, with exercise prices of $15.51, $31.61, $15.51, $31.61,$28.25, $34.93, $14.88, $30.11, respectively, and expiration dates of April 30, 2007, December 17, 2007, December 17, 2007, October 14, 2008, April 21, 2009, January 13, 2010, January 3, 2011, and January 22, 2012, respectively. The number of securities underlying unexercised Wyndham options are: 10,297, 48,572, 75,483, 64,325, 125,098, 105,030, 208,498 and 62,549, with exercise prices of $20.62, $42.03, $20.62, $42.03, $37.56, $46.44, $19.78, and $40.03, respectively, and expiration dates of April 30, 2007, December 17, 2007, December 17, 2007, October 14, 2008, April 21, 2009, January 13, 2010, January 3, 2011, and January 22, 2012, respectively.
(o)

In connection with the Cendant Separation, Mr. Holmes received Realogy and Wyndham stock options as follows, all of which are currently exercisable. The number of securities underlying unexercised Realogy options are: 54,200, 83,664, 87,839, 23,536, 156,373, 131,288, 260,622 and 45,608, with exercise prices of $31.61, $31.61, $15.51, $15.51, $28.25, $34.93, $14.88, $30.11, respectively, and

expiration dates of December 17, 2007, October 14, 2008, December 17, 2007, April 30, 2007, April 21, 2009, January 13, 2010, January 3, 2011, and January 22, 2012, respectively. The number of securities underlying unexercised Wyndham options are: 43,360, 66,931, 70,271, 18,829, 125,098, 105,030, 208,498, and 36,486, with exercise prices of $42.03, $42.03, $20.62, $20.62, $37.56, $46.44, $19.78, and $40.03, respectively, and expiration dates of December 17, 2007, October 14, 2008, December 17, 2007, April 30, 2007, April 21, 2009, January 13, 2010, January 3, 2011, and January 22, 2012, respectively.

2006 Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table

  Option Awards Stock Awards

Name*

 Number of
Shares Acquired
on Exercise
(#)
  Value Realized
on Exercise
($)
 Number of
Avis Budget
Shares
Acquired
on Vesting
(#)(a)
 Number of
Realogy Shares
Acquired on
Vesting
(#)(b)
 Number of
Wyndham Shares
Acquired on
Vesting
(#)(c)
 Value Realized
on Vesting
($)(d)

Mr. Nelson

 —     —   26,767 66,918 53,534 3,465,006

Mr. Wyshner

 —     —   4,794 9,823 7,858 654,232

Mr. Salerno

 —     —   8,847 19,237 15,390 1,190,241

Mr. McClain

 —     —   3,336 7,260 5,808 448,722

Mr. Servodidio

 —     —   3,520 7,671 6,136 473,213

Mr. Buckman

 —     —   16,043 35,787 28,629 2,144,243

Mr. Holmes

 250,520(e) $2,003,516 24,080 54,197 43,357 3,210,747

(4)*OnMr. Silverman did not exercise any options or have any restricted stock units outstanding during 2006.

(a)

In April 26,2003, each named executive officer (“NEO”) was granted time-vested restricted stock units relating to shares of Cendant Common Stock. Up to one-quarter of the units were to vest in each of the four successive years following the grant date. In addition, in April 2005 and April 2004, each Named Executive Officer (other than Mr. Silverman)NEO was granted performance-vesting restricted stock units relating to shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Cendant Common Stock”). The terms of such restricted stock units provided that uponStock. Upon the vesting of a unit, the Named Executive Officer becomesNEO was to become entitled to receive a share of Cendant Common Stock. Up to one- eighthone-eighth of the units maywere to vest on April 27 in each of 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 based upon the extent to whichfour successive years following the Company attainsgrant date as long as Cendant attained specific pre-established performance goals for each fiscal year 2005 through the end of the most recently completed fiscal year prior to such business day (i.e., 25% of the units scheduled to vest each year will vest if performance reaches “threshold” levels, and 100% of such units will vest if performance reaches “target” levels).year. The performance goals relating tofor these units arewere to be based upon the “total unit growth” of the Cendant Common Stockstock in relation to the average historic “total stockholder return” of the S&P 500 (“total unit growth” is comprised of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization plus increases in free cash flow generation). Units which fail to vest in 2006, 2007 and 2008 may become vested in later year(s) subject to the Company’s attainment of cumulative multi-year performance goals. In addition, up to one-halfthe other 4/8ths (or one-half) of the units may vest on April 27, 2009could have vested at the end of the fourth year based upon the extent to which Cendant attained cumulative four-year pre-established performance goals. Thefour year pre- established performance goals relating to these units arethat were set based upon the “total unit growth” of the Common Stock in relation toon the top-quartile average historic “total stockholdershareholder return” of the S&P 500. In all cases, intermediate levelsThis half of the grant was considered “above target” and the first half of each grant considered “at target”. Upon the vesting will occur for interim levels of performance. Vesting is also subjecta unit the NEO was to become entitled to receive a share of Cendant Common Stock.

As a result of the Cendant Separation, the Cendant Compensation Committee approved the accelerated vesting of all “at target” grants for the 2004 and 2005 grants and the final tranche of the 2003 grant following the second spin-off. The Realogy and Wyndham distributions occurred on July 31, 2006 and the accelerated vesting occurred on August 15, 2006. All “above target” awards were canceled prior to the completion of the Cendant Separation. In addition, all accrued cash dividends accrued from the date of grant were paid in connection with such vesting.

As a result, Mr. Nelson received 19,970 units relating to his “at target” 2005 award and gave up the remaining 19,970 units related to the “above target” RSUs. Similarly he received 6,797 units relating to his “at target” 2004 award and gave up the remaining 9,063 units related to the “above target” RSUs. Mr. Salerno received 3,994 units relating to his “at target” 2005 award and gave up the remaining 3,994 units related to the “above target” RSUs. Similarly he received 2,549 units relating to his “at target” 2004 award and gave up the remaining 3,399 units related to the “above target” RSUs. Mr. Wyshner received 2,097 units relating to his “at target” 2005 award and gave up the remaining 2,097 units related to the “above target” RSUs. Similarly he received 969 units relating to his “at target” 2004 award and gave up the remaining 1,291 units related to the “above target” RSUs. Mr. Servodidio received 1,598 units relating to his “at target” 2005 award and gave up the remaining 1,598 units related to the “above target” RSUs. Similarly he received 1,020 units relating to his “at target” 2004 award and gave up the remaining 1,359 units related to the “above target” RSUs. Mr. McClain received 1,623 units relating to his “at target” 2005 award and gave up the remaining 1,623 units related to the “above target” RSUs. Similarly he received 850 units relating to his “at target” 2004 award and gave up the remaining 1,133 units related to the “above target” RSUs. Mr. Buckman received 7,489 units relating to his “at target” 2005 award and gave up the remaining 7,489 units related to the “above target” RSUs. Similarly he received 5,098 units relating to his “at target” 2004 award and gave up the remaining 6,797 units related to the “above target” RSUs. Mr. Holmes received 12,481 units relating to his “at target” 2005 award and gave up the remaining 12,481 units related to the “above target” RSUs. Similarly he received 6,797 units related to his “at target” 2004 award and gave up the remaining 9,063 shares related to the “above-target” RSUs.

(b)Represents the Named Executive Officer remaining continuously employed with the Company through the applicable vesting date. Each Named Executive Officer received the following number of performance-vesting restrictedshares of Realogy common stock units (numbers reflect equitable adjustments madeacquired upon the vesting described in connection withfootnote (a) above.
(c)Represents the Company’s spin-off of PHH Corporation): Mr. Silverman, 0; Mr. Buckman, 149,775; Mr. Nelson, 399,401; Mr. Holmes, 249,626; and Mr. Smith, 249,626. The number of units granted to each Named Executive Officer was approved byshares of Wyndham common stock acquired upon the Compensation Committee. All units are eligible to receive cash dividend equivalents, which remain restricted and subject to forfeiture untilvesting described in footnote (a) above,
(d)Represents the unit for which it was paid becomes vested. Theaggregate value of the shares of Common Stock underlyingAvis Budget Group, Realogy and Wyndham described in footnotes (a), (b) and (c) above upon vesting.
(e)Represents shares vested without giving effect to the unitsone-for-ten reverse stock split.

2006 Pension Benefits Table

Name

Plan Name(a)

Number of Years of
Credited Service (#)(a)

Present Value of
Accumulated
Benefit ($)(a)

Payments During
Last Fiscal Year ($)

Mr. Salerno

Avis Rent A Car System, Inc. Pension Plan24 years, 7 months as of the date12/31/06285,850—  

Mr. Salerno

Avis Rent A Car System, Inc. Retirement Equalization Benefit Plan24 years, 7 months as of grant are shown in the table above12/31/06368,639—  

(a)Avis froze its qualified and reflect a per unit value of $20.03, based upon the closing price of the Common Stock on April 26, 2005. The value of the shares underlying all units held by each Named Executive Officernon-qualified defined benefit pension plans to new participation and future benefit accruals as of December 30, 2005 (including outstanding units granted31, 1998. Mr. Salerno is the only Named Executive Office who participated in 2005 and prior years) reflectingthese plans. Prior to December 31, 1998 Mr. Salerno earned the right to receive certain benefits upon retirement at the retirement age of 65 or upon early retirement on or after age 55. For a per unit valuediscussion of the Common Stockcalculation of $17.25 equaled: Mr. Silverman, $0; Mr. Buckman, $5,231,822; Mr. Nelson, $9,625,586; Mr. Holmes, $7,870,123; and Mr. Smith, $8,002,586.retirement benefits, please see Note 19 to our audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 included in our 2006 Form 10-K.

2006 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table

Name

  Executive
Contributions
in Last FY
($)(a)
  Registrant
Contributions
in Last FY
($)(b)
  Aggregate
Earnings in
Last FY
($)(c)
  Aggregate
Withdrawals /
Distributions
($)(d)
  Aggregate
Balance at
Last FYE
($)(e)

Mr. Silverman

  83,769  83,769  207,215  —    —  

Mr. Nelson

  249,496  75,505  177,215  —    5,851,837

Mr. Salerno

  59,478  59,478  (3,896) —    536,628

Mr. Wyshner

  44,221  44,221  5,710  19,371  484,797

Mr. McClain

  22,748  22,748  5,234  —    414,336

Mr. Servodidio

  6,740  6,740  (93) —    81,896

Mr. Buckman

  26,394  26,394  (25,356) —    2,377,668

Mr. Holmes

  22,875  22,875  22,510  —    —  

(a)

In connection with the Separation Plan and subject to necessary approvals and consents, the Company expects that all restricted stock units that vest upon the attainment of “above-target” financial performance

will be cancelled and that all other restricted stock units will vest (without regard to the attainment of any existing performance criteria, which have been waived by action of the Compensation Committee) on the thirtieth day following the distributions of Realogy and Wyndham Worldwide by the Company. Such acceleration will apply to all current Cendant employees as well as those terminated from employment in connection with the Separation Plan, but not any employee who resigns or is terminated for cause.

The value of the shares underlying all units held by each Named Executive Officer as of December 30, 2005 (including outstanding units granted in 2005 and all prior years) and reflecting a per unit value of the Company’s common stock of $17.25 equaled as follows:

   

Above-Target Vesting
(to be cancelled)

($)

  

At-Target Vesting
(to be vested)

($)

  

Total

($)

Mr. Silverman

  0  0  0

Mr. Buckman

  2,464,335  2,767,487  5,231,822

Mr. Nelson

  5,008,210  4,617,377  9,625,586

Mr. Holmes

  3,716,409  4,153,714  7,870,123

Mr. Smith

  3,716,409  4,286,177  8,002,586

(5)Reflects an equitable adjustment made in connection with the Company’s spin-off of PHH Corporation.

(6)PaymentsAmounts shown are included in these amounts for fiscal year 2005 consist of (i) Company matching contributions to a non-qualified deferred compensation plan maintained by the Company (“Defined Contribution Match”), (ii) benefits relating to supplemental life insuranceSalary and (iii) executive medical benefits. Defined Contribution Match includes matching contributions relating to deferred bonuses in respect of fiscal year 2005 and paid in the first quarter of 2006. The foregoing amounts were as follows:

   Year  

Defined

Contribution

Match ($)

  

Life Insurance

Premium/Life
Insurance Bonus

($)(*)

  

Executive

Medical

Benefits ($)

  Totals ($)

Mr. Silverman

  2005  936,996  5,656,000  7,500  6,600,496

Mr. Buckman

  2005  80,100  135,328  7,500  222,928

Mr. Nelson

  2005  119,850  96,233  7,500  223,583

Mr. Holmes

  2005  128,850  80,128  7,500  216,478

Mr. Smith

  2005  105,975  96,582  9,345  211,902

(*)Amounts reflect benefits relating to supplemental life insurance. For Mr. Silverman, the amount represents premiums paid by the Company under Mr. Silverman’s insurance arrangement. For each other Named Executive Officer, amounts represent bonuses under the Executive Officer Supplemental Life Insurance Program (such bonus amounts are also reflectedBonus columns in the Summary Compensation Table aboveas individually identified in footnotes (b) and (c) to the table. Under the deferred compensation plan, participants can elect to defer a maximum of 80% of base salary and 98% of annual bonus. The agreements between participants and the Company must provide that the deferrals under the “Bonus” column). In connection withplan are (1) irrevocable; (2) agreed to before the Compensation Committee’s decision to terminate this life insurance program,compensation is earned; and (3) for a specified length of time.
(b)Participant deferrals are matched dollar-for-dollar by the Company eliminated the requirement that such bonus amounts be appliedup to life insurance.6% of base salary and 6% of annual bonus.

(7)(c)Mr. Nelson commenced employment withAll participant deferrals and matching contributions are immediately vested and are held in a grantor trust. Under this arrangement, the Company takes no tax deduction, and the beneficiaries pay no tax on April 14, 2003.contributions to the trust until they start receiving their money. Although funds are potentially subject to the employer’s creditors, they are inaccessible to present and future management. Participants may allocate deferrals to one or more of a variety of investment options including Company stock.
(d)A participant in this plan may elect to receive payment in the form of a single lump sum or in annual installments over a period of up to 10 years; all account balances will be paid in a single lump sum upon change of control of the Company. In December 2002, Mr. Wyshner elected to have his 2003 plan year amounts distributed to him in five equal annual installments, beginning in January 2005.
(e)Total trust assets accumulated for all periods of plan participation through the end of 2006. The aggregate balance is the sum of all participant and registrant contributions and investment in earnings less any withdrawals or distributions. Amounts for Mr. Silverman and Mr. Holmes have been assumed by Realogy and Wyndham, respectively.

Option Grants in 2005

None of the Company’s Named Executive Officers received a stock option grant during 2005.

Aggregated Option Exercises in 2005Employment Agreements and Year-End Option ValuesOther Arrangements

The following table summarizes the exercise of Common Stock options by the Named Executive Officers during the last fiscal year and the value of unexercised options held by such officers as of the end of such fiscal year:

Name

  

Shares Acquired

on Exercise (#)

  

Value

Realized ($)

  

Number of Securities

Underlying Unexercised

Options/SARS

at FY-End (#)(1)

Exercisable/Unexercisable

  

Value of Unexercised

In-the-Money

Options/SARS

at FY-End ($)(2)

Exercisable/Unexercisable

Mr. Silverman

  9,607,677  117,644,547  25,439,589/0  82,779,980/0

Mr. Buckman

  698,397  9,372,944  3,499,277/0  11,966,721/0

Mr. Nelson

  0  0  521,245/521,245  2,451,473/2,451,473

Mr. Holmes

  293,821  4,662,648  3,623,054/0  14,090,247/0

Mr. Smith

  5,323  76,581  3,484,579/0  17,563,686/0

(1)Reflects an equitable adjustment made in connection with the Company’s spin-off of PHH Corporation.

(2)Amounts are based upon a December 30, 2005 closing price per share of Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange of $17.25.

Employment Contracts and Termination, Severance and Change of Control Arrangements

Each Named Executive Officer is employed by the Company pursuant to a written agreement of employment. Each such employment agreement contains covenants precluding the Named Executive Officer from competing, directly or indirectly, against the Company and/or the business unit or units for which such officer performs services during a period of time set forth in each respective employment agreement, including post-employment periods. The Compensation Committee has considered the advisability of using employment agreements and determined that under certain circumstances it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders insofar as, among other reasons, it allows the Company to achieve its desired goals of retaining the best possible executive talent and obtaining post-employment non-competition covenants from executive officers.

Mr. Silverman. Mr. Silverman was employed by the Company pursuant to an employment agreement originally entered into as of September 30, 1991 between Mr. Silverman and HFS Incorporated and amended and restated from time to time (the “Prior Silverman Agreement”). Effective July 1, 2002, Mr. Silverman and the Company entered into an Amended and Extended Employment Agreement (the “Amended Silverman Agreement”). Effective July 28, 2003, the Amended Silverman Agreement was amended as described below (the “First Amendment”). Effective August 20, 2004, the Amended Silverman Agreement was amended as described below (the “Second Amendment”) in order to, among other things, reduce Mr. Silverman’s potential post-employment compensation and condition his annual bonus on the Company’s attainment of financial performance goals relating to the Company. The Second Amendment substantially reduced Mr. Silverman’s potential severance and post-employment benefits and compensation opportunities and altered his annual bonus program to condition a substantial portion of potential bonus payments on Company performance goals. Effective January 21, 2005, the Amended Silverman Agreement was amended as described below (the “Third Amendment”) to clarify a provision relating to the Second Amendment.

Pursuant to the Amended Silverman Agreement, Mr. Silverman serves the Company as its President and Chief Executive Officer and as the Chairman of the Board and the Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Board; however, during 2004, Mr. Nelson assumed the position of President. The term of employment under the Amended Silverman Agreement expires on December 31, 2007, subject to earlier termination upon certain events.

The Amended Silverman Agreement provides Mr. Silverman with a base salary of $3,300,000. Mr. Silverman has not received a salary increase since July 2002.

Pursuant to the Amended Silverman Agreement, prior to the Second Amendment, Mr. Silverman’s bonus was 0.60% of the Company’s pre-tax income as defined in the Amended Silverman Agreement, with a limit on the bonus amount equal to $100,000 per each cent of the Company’s earnings per share as defined in the Amended Silverman Agreement (“Target Bonus”). For 2004 and later years, in connection with the Second Amendment, the Target Bonus continues to apply, except that the value payable in respect of the Target Bonus is comprised of two components: (i) the Target Bonus but subject to a limit of 150% of Mr. Silverman’s base salary (the “Capped Bonus”) plus (ii) the remainder of the value that would have otherwise been payable in respect of the Target Bonus (the “Performance Based Bonus”), but which is now subject to the Company’s attainment of performance goals relating to the Company’s Average Growth in Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share (“AGEPS”) as defined in the Second Amendment. The Performance Based Bonus will not be paid if AGEPS is less than 8% and will be paid at 100% if AGEPS equals 13% or greater. Interim levels of payment will be made for interim levels of AGEPS performance. To the extent the Performance Based Bonus is paid at less than 100% in 2004, 2005 and 2006, such amounts not earned will be carried over into future fiscal years and may be subsequently earned by Mr. Silverman if in any such future year the Company attains an annualized rate of AGEPS of 13% or greater over any multi-year period. For 2005, the Capped Bonus will equal $4,950,000 and the Performance Based Bonus will equal $7,366,600.

The Amended Silverman Agreement provides Mr. Silverman with specified benefits and perquisites no less favorable than those provided to other senior officers of the Company and no less favorable than those provided to chief executive officers of comparable public companies, including priority business use of corporate aircraft, personal use of corporate aircraft subject to availability, and access to car service. The Amended Silverman Agreement also provides Mr. Silverman with standard corporate indemnification rights.

Prior to the First Amendment, the Amended Silverman Agreement required the Company to provide Mr. Silverman with term life insurance with a face amount of $100 million for the remainder of his life, subject to earlier termination upon certain events. During 2003, pursuant to the First Amendment, the Amended Silverman Agreement was amended in order to implement a replacement life insurance program, which meets both the requirements of the Amended Silverman Agreement and certain provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

The Amended Silverman Agreement eliminated the Company’s requirement to provide Mr. Silverman with annual option grants covering two million shares of Common Stock. Accordingly, Mr. Silverman has not received any option or other equity awards during 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005.

The Amended Silverman Agreement, prior to the Second Amendment, provided that if Mr. Silverman resigns his employment for Good Reason (as defined in the Amended Silverman Agreement) or if he is terminated by the Company without Cause (as defined in the Amended Silverman Agreement), he will be entitled to receive a lump sum cash payment equal to (i) the sum of his then current base salary plus bonus earned in the year prior to termination, multiplied by (ii) the greater of the number of years and partial years remaining in the term of employment under the Amended Silverman Agreement and 2.99. Pursuant to the Second Amendment, such potential severance payment is reduced to (i) the sum of his current base plus bonus, multiplied by (ii) the number of years and partial years remaining in the term of employment, but in no event greater than 2.99. Further, such amount will be reduced by a present value factor of 5% to reflect the time value of money in receiving base salary and bonus amounts in a lump sum at an earlier date. Mr. Silverman will also receive a pro rata portion of his annual bonus in respect of the fiscal year in which such termination occurs. In addition, Mr. Silverman (and his eligible dependents) will be entitled to continued health and welfare benefits during the remaining term of employment (or a 3-year period, if longer) and the vesting of any options and restricted stock. However, the Company may remove Mr. Silverman from his position of Chief Executive Officer (but not Chairman of the Board) without triggering such termination provisions.

The Amended Silverman Agreement, prior to the Second Amendment, provided that if Mr. Silverman’s employment with the Company is terminated other than due to death or for Cause (but including a resignation for Good Reason), the Company would (i) provide him certain benefits for life, including medical and welfare benefits, office and clerical support, access to corporate aircraft on terms applicable to senior executives of the Company, access to a car and driver, appropriate security when traveling on Company business, and reimbursement of any properly documented business expenses (the “Post Term Benefits”); and (ii) maintain Mr. Silverman as an employee to provide such services as requested by any successor chief executive officer and keep himself reasonably available to the Company to render advice or to provide services for the rest of his life, for no more than 90 days per year, in return for which he would be paid $83,000 per month (the “Post Term Consulting Services”). In connection with the Second Amendment, the term of the Post Term Consulting Services was reduced to a period of five years. The Company’s obligation to provide Mr. Silverman with compensation and benefits pursuant to the Post Term Consulting Services will terminate in the event Mr. Silverman becomes unable or is unwilling to provide consulting services, or in the event Mr. Silverman is convicted of a felony or violates any restrictive covenants set forth in the Amended Silverman Agreement. In addition, the Company maintains the right to terminate the Post Term Consulting Services and the compensation and benefits payable thereunder by providing Mr. Silverman a lump sum cash payment equal to the net present value of such compensation and benefits. Further, in the event of an actual or potential change of control of the Company, Mr. Silverman may elect to terminate the Post Term Consulting Services and receive such lump sum cash payment.

The Amended Silverman Agreement further provides that Mr. Silverman will be made whole on an after-tax basis with respect to certain excise taxes in connection with a change of control of the Company which may, in certain cases, be imposed upon payments thereunder and under other compensation and benefit arrangements.

The Amended Silverman Agreement provides that Mr. Silverman will be restricted from engaging in certain competitive activities against the Company. Such non-competition covenants will remain in effect in no event for less than two years following his termination of employment for Cause or his resignation, and, in connection with the Third Amendment, will remain in effect for so long as Mr. Silverman is receiving the Post Term Benefits (i.e., Mr. Silverman may not compete against the Company, for the rest of his life, as long as he is receiving the Post Term Benefits).

In connection with the Cendant Separation, Plan, the Compensation Committee approved the Company entering into a new agreement with Mr. Silverman (the “Letter Agreement”) regarding the effect of the Separation Plan on the parties’ respective rights and obligations under the Amended Silverman Agreement and the Company and Mr. Silverman havewe entered into such agreement.

Underagreements with Messrs. Silverman and Buckman. Mr. Silverman’s agreement sets forth the terms of the Letter Agreement, Mr. Silverman’s employment with the Company will terminate effective as of the completion of the Realogy and Wyndham Worldwide distributions (the “Termination Date”) and, in accordance with the Amended Silverman Agreement, Mr. Silverman will be paid a lump sum cash payment in an amount equalrespect to the net present value of the product of (x) the sum of (1) his base salary plus (2) his annual bonus for the preceding fiscal year multiplied by (y) the number of full and partial years remainingseverance payments described above in the employment term through December 31, 2007. This payment is expected to be approximately $21.7 million. Also in accordance with the Amended Silverman Agreement, Mr. Silverman will be paid a pro rata annual bonus for 2006 (based upon his bonus for the preceding fiscal year) in an amount expected to equal approximately $6.6 million. As of the Termination Date, the Company will cease toSummary Compensation Table. We have any obligationsno obligation to provide Mr. Silverman with post-separation benefits under his original employment agreement as such benefits were assumed by Realogy, and we believe we have satisfied all of our payment obligations to Mr. Silverman under his agreement. Mr. Buckman’s agreement provided

for the Amended Silverman Agreement. The post-separation benefits consistpayment of consulting payments, healthseverance as described above in the Summary Compensation Table and welfare coverage, office space and clerical support, and access to automobile and driver and corporate aircraft, the provision of which will become the obligation of Realogy in accordance with a separateMr. Buckman’s employment agreement (discussed below) which has beenwith us. We are required to provide Mr. Buckman with post-separation benefits under his employment agreement. Mr. Holmes’s employment agreement with us was terminated and he entered into between Mr. Silverman and Realogy.

Mr. Silverman has agreed to serve, at the pleasure of the Board of Directors,an agreement with Wyndham in connection with his role as Chief Executive Officer of the Company until the date of the completion of the Separation Plan, but in no event beyond December 31, 2006. Mr. Silverman will not receive any compensation or benefits during this period.

Wyndham.

The Letter Agreement also provides for the settlement of the parties’ respective rights and obligations with respect to split-dollar insurance policies maintained by the Company on Mr. Silverman’s life. The settlement is designed to maintain the same overall cost to the Company, on a present value basis, as compared to its costs under the existing split-dollar arrangements. The Letter Agreement provides that if the Company shall have paid to the insurance companies an amount which is necessary to fund the policies (the “Policy Funding Amount”), then (i) pursuant to the existing split-dollar arrangement, the Company will make a payment to Mr. Silverman in an amount necessary for Mr. Silverman or his assignee to purchase the policies from the Company at that time (the “Purchase Amount”), the payment and the purchase to take place in January 2007 (with the purchase price being returned to the Company) and (ii) in settlement of the Company’s on-going obligation to make annual bonus payments to Mr. Silverman under the split-dollar insurance policies, the Company will make a one-time cash payment to Mr. Silverman in January 2007 (the “Bonus Replacement Payment”). It is expected that the Policy Funding Amount will be approximately $14.6 million and the Bonus Replacement Payment is expected to be approximately $19.8 million. The Letter Agreement also provides that, if a Potential Change in Control (as defined in the Amended Silverman Agreement) occurs prior to payment to Mr. Silverman of the Purchase Amount and the Bonus Replacement Payment, the Company will be obligated to establish an irrevocable grantor trust and contribute to this trust the split-dollar insurance policies and a cash amount equal to the sum of the Purchase Amount and the Bonus Replacement Payment.

Mr. Silverman also entered into a new employment agreement with Realogy, to be effective upon Realogy’s separation from the Company (the “Realogy Employment Agreement”). Under the terms of the Realogy Employment Agreement, Mr. Silverman will serve as Realogy’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer through December 31, 2007, at which time Mr. Silverman is expected to retire as anEach Avis Budget named executive officer of Realogy but remain as a non-employee director. During the period through December 31, 2007, Mr. Silverman will (a) provide services to Realogy for cash compensation equal to $1 per year, (b) not be eligible to receive any new equity grants or incentive compensation awards and (c) be entitled to the same executive benefits and perquisites as are provided to him under the Amended Silverman Agreement. The Realogy Employment Agreement also provides Mr. Silverman with certain post-separation benefits provided for under the Amended Silverman Agreement.

The Realogy Employment Agreement provides that for a period of five years following his retirement, Mr. Silverman will be required to perform consulting services as reasonably requestedis employed by the Chief Executive Officer of Realogy at the rate of compensation previously provided for in the Amended Silverman Agreement. Mr. Silverman will be subject to restrictive covenants with respect to Realogy, including a non-competition provision, comparable to the terms and conditions of the restrictive covenants in the Amended Silverman Agreement.

Mr. Buckman.The Company entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Buckman dated as of September 12, 1997 (the “Buckman Employment Agreement”). The Buckman Employment Agreement originally provided for a period of employment through December 17, 2002 with automatic one-year extensions on an annual basis. The Buckman Agreement is subject to earlier termination upon certain events.

The Buckman Employment Agreement specifies the compensation and benefits provided to Mr. Buckman during the period of employment. Effective for 2002, the Compensation Committee approved a base salary for Mr. Buckman equal to $762,500. This level of base salary has not increased. Mr. Buckman is eligible to participate in all of the Company’s other compensation and employee benefit plans or programs and to receive officer perquisites.

The Buckman Employment Agreement provides for certain payments in the event of termination of Mr. Buckman’s employment under various circumstances. The Buckman Employment Agreement provides that if Mr. Buckman’s employment is terminated by the Company other than for Cause (as defined in the Buckman Employment Agreement), or by Mr. Buckman for Constructive Discharge (as defined in the Buckman Employment Agreement), the Company will pay Mr. Buckman a lump sum cash payment equal to 500% of the

sum of (i) his annual base salary and (ii) the highest annual bonus he has received for any of the three preceding years (or $500,000, if higher); provided thatus pursuant to a furtherwritten agreement (see “Other Agreements” below), the amount of bonus to be used in determining the severance payment may not exceed 100% of his base salary. In such event, Mr. Buckman would also receive any earned but unpaid base salary and incentive compensation, his benefits and perquisites would continue for 36 months and any unvested stock options (excluding the option granted in January 2001 in the case of a resignation) and restricted stock would vest (and such unvested options would remain outstanding for the remainder of their terms without regard to such termination).

The Buckman Employment Agreement provides that Mr. Buckman will be made whole on an after-tax basis with respect to certain excise taxes in connection with a change of control of the Company which may, in certain cases, be imposed upon payments thereunder and under other compensation and benefit arrangements.

In connection with the Separation Plan, the Compensation Committee approved the Company entering into a separation and severance with Mr. Buckman (the “Buckman Letter Agreement”) and the Company and Mr. Buckman have entered into such agreement.

Under the terms of the Buckman Letter Agreement, Mr. Buckman’s employment with the Company will terminate effective as of the Termination Date and, upon such termination, Mr. Buckman will receive certain severance benefits and continued benefits and perquisites provided for under the Buckman Employment Agreement. The severance payment is expected to be approximately $7.6 million. Mr. Buckman has agreed to serve, at the pleasure of the Board of Directors, as the General Counsel of the Company until the earliest to occur of (i) the completion of the Separation Plan, (ii) the date on which Mr. Buckman notifies the Company that he no longer wishes to continue to serve or (iii) December 31, 2006. Mr. Buckman will not receive any additional compensation or benefits during this period.

Mr. Nelson. The Company entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Nelson as of April 14, 2003 (the “Nelson Employment Agreement”). The Nelson Employment Agreement has a three-year term with automatic one-year extensions on each anniversary of the effective date. Such extensions occur unless either party provides written notice to the other party at least thirty days prior to any such anniversary. Theseverance agreement.

Ronald L. Nelson Employment Agreement is subject to earlier termination upon certain events.

The Nelson Employment Agreement provides that during his term of employment, Mr. Nelson will be paid an annual base salary equal to $762,500 and will be eligible for annual bonuses based on a target of 200% of annual base salary. Mr. Nelson is eligible to participate in all of the Company’s other compensation and employee benefit plans or programs and to receive officer perquisites. The Nelson Employment Agreement provided Mr. Nelson with an initial award of one million options with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of Company common stock as of the date of grant and further provides for annual awards, subject to the approval of the Compensation Committee, which are no less favorable than awards provided to other direct reports of the Chief Executive Officer and with targeted value equal to $1.5 million. The Nelson Employment Agreement also provided Mr. Nelson with relocation benefits covering all of his incurred costs with respect to the relocation of his primary residence, including for taxes relating to relocation expense reimbursements.

The Nelson Employment Agreement provides that if Mr. Nelson’s employment is terminated by the Company other than for Cause (as defined in the Nelson Employment Agreement) or by Mr. Nelson for Constructive Discharge (as defined in the Nelson Employment Agreement), the Company will pay Mr. Nelson a lump sum cash payment equal to 299% of his base salary plus target incentive bonus. In addition, each of Mr. Nelson’s outstanding options (and any other outstanding equity awards) will become fully vested and such options will remain exercisable until the first to occur of the third anniversary of the date of such termination and the original expiration date of such option. In addition, Mr. Nelson will receive health benefits for a period of three years at the employee rate. If such termination occurs either within the first three years of his employment, or within one year of a Change-of-Control Transaction (as defined in the Nelson Employment Agreement), the Company will reimburse Mr. Nelson for all relocation expenses incurred should he relocate his primary residence back to the West Coast.

In connection with the Separation Plan, the Compensation Committee approved the Company entering into an agreement with Mr. Nelson, which will become effective as of the Termination Date (the “New Nelson Agreement”) and the Company and Mr. Nelson have entered into such agreement.

The New Nelson Agreement will havehas a term ending on the third anniversary of the effective date; provided, that such term will automatically extend for one additional year unless the Companywe or Mr. Nelson provides notice to the other party of non-renewal at least six months prior to such third anniversary. Pursuant to the Company’sour by-laws, theour Board of Directors may terminate Mr. Nelson’s employment at any time. Upon expiration of the New Nelson Agreement,employment agreement, Mr. Nelson will be an employee at will unless the New Nelson Agreementagreement is renewed or a new agreement is executed.

In addition to providing for a minimum base salary of $1 million and employee benefit plans generally available to the Company’sour executive officers, the New Nelson Agreement will provideMr. Nelson’s agreement provides for an annual incentive award with a target amount equal to 150% of his base salary, subject to attainment of performance goals, and grants of long-term incentive awards, upon such terms and conditions as determined by theour Board of Directors or Compensation Committee. Mr. Nelson’s agreement will provideprovides that if his employment with us is terminated by the Companyus without “cause” or due to a “constructive discharge” (each term as defined in the New Nelson Agreement)Mr. Nelson’s agreement), he will be entitled to a lump sum payment equal to 299% of the sum of his then-current base salary plus his then-current target annual bonus. In addition, in this event, all of Mr. Nelson’s then-outstanding equity awards will become fully vested (and any stock options and stock appreciation rights granted on or after the Termination Datedistribution date will remain exercisable until the earlier of three years following his termination of employment and the original expiration date of such awards).

Options granted prior to the distribution willseparation remain exercisable in accordance with the Nelson Agreement. The New Nelson Agreement willMr. Nelson’s prior agreement with us. Mr. Nelson’s employment agreement also provideprovides him and his dependents with medical benefits through his age 75. The New Nelson Agreement will provideemployment agreement provides Mr. Nelson with the right to claim a constructive discharge if, among other things, he is not the Chief Executive Officer and the Company’sour most senior executive officer, or does not report directly to the Board of Directors; the Company notifieswe notify Mr. Nelson that the Companywe will not extend the term of the New Nelson Agreementemployment agreement for an additional fourth year or, following the expiration of the New Nelson Agreement, the Company doesemployment agreement, we do not offer to extend the agreement for a period of at least two but no more than four years on substantially similar terms; there occurs a “corporate transaction” (as defined in the New Nelson Agreement)Mr. Nelson’s agreement); or the Company failswe fail to nominate Mr. Nelson to be a member of theour Board of Directors. The New Nelson Agreement will provideMr. Nelson’s agreement provides for post-termination non-competition and non-solicitation covenants which will last for two years following Mr. Nelson’s employment with the Company.

us. Mr. Holmes. The Company entered into anNelson has a right pursuant to his employment agreement with Mr. Holmes dated as of September 12, 1997 (the “Holmes Employment Agreement”). The Holmes Employment Agreement originally providedto be reimbursed from the company for a period of employment through December 17, 2002 with automatic one-year extensionsany “golden parachute” excise tax, including taxes on an annual basis. The Holmes Agreement isany reimbursement, subject to earlier termination upon certain events.limitations described in his employment agreement.

F. Robert Salerno

The Holmes Employment Agreement specifies the compensation and benefits provided to Mr. Holmes during the period of employment. Effective for 2002, the Compensation Committee approved a base salary for Mr. Holmes equal to $762,500. This level of base salarySalerno’s employment agreement has not increased. Mr. Holmes is eligible to participate in all of the Company’s other compensation and employee benefit plans or programs and to receive officer perquisites.

The Holmes Employment Agreements provides for certain payments in the event of termination of Mr. Holmes’ employment under various circumstances. The Holmes Employment Agreement provides that if Mr. Holmes’ employment is terminated by the Company other than for Cause (as defined in the Holmes Employment Agreement), or by Mr. Holmes for Constructive Discharge (as defined in the Holmes Employment Agreement) or by resignation, the Company will pay Mr. Holmes a lump sum cash payment equal to 500% of the sum of (i) his annual base salary and (ii) the highest annual bonus he has received for any of the three preceding years (or $520,000, if higher); provided that pursuant to a further agreement (see “—Other Agreements” below), the amount of bonus to be used in determining the severance payment may not exceed 100% of his base salary. In such event, Mr. Holmes would also receive any earned but unpaid base salary and incentive compensation, his

benefits and perquisites would continue for 36 months and any unvested stock options (excluding the option granted in January 2001 in the case of a resignation) and restricted stock would vest (and such unvested options would remain outstanding for the remainder of their terms without regard to such termination).

The Holmes Employment Agreement provides that Mr. Holmes will be made whole on an after-tax basis with respect to certain excise taxes in connection with a change of control of the Company which may, in certain cases, be imposed upon payments thereunder and under other compensation and benefit arrangements.

In connection with the Separation Plan, the Compensation Committee approved Wyndham Worldwide entering into an agreement with Mr. Holmes, which will become effective as of the date of the Wyndham Worldwide distribution, and Wyndham Worldwide and Mr. Holmes have entered into such agreement (the “Holmes Wyndham Agreement”).

The Holmes Wyndham Agreement will have a term ending on the third anniversary of the distribution;effective date; provided that such term will automatically extend for one additional year unless Wyndham Worldwidewe or Mr. HolmesSalerno provides notice to the other party of non-renewal at least six months prior to such third anniversary. Pursuant to Wyndham Worldwide’s by-laws, its Board of Directors may terminate Mr. Holmes’ employment at any time. Upon expiration of the Holmes Wyndham Agreement, Mr. Holmes will be an employee at will unless the agreement is renewed or a new agreement is executed.

In addition to providing for a minimum base salary of $1 million$700,000 and employee benefit plans generally available to Wyndham’sour executive officers, Mr. Holmes’Salerno’s agreement will provideprovides for an annual incentive award with a target amount equal to 200%100% of his base salary, subject to attainment of performance goals, and grants of long-term

incentive awards, upon such terms and conditions as determined by Wyndham’sour Board of Directors or Compensation Committee. The Holmes Wyndham Agreement will provideMr. Salerno’s agreement provides that if his employment with Wyndhamus is terminated by Wyndhamus without “cause” or due to a “constructive discharge” (each term as defined in Mr. Holmes’Salerno’s agreement), he will be entitled to a lump sum payment equal to 299% of the sum of his then-current base salary plus his then-current target annual bonus. In addition, in this event, all of Mr. Holmes’Salerno’s then-outstanding Wyndham equity awards will become fully vested (and any Wyndham stock options and stock appreciation rights granted on or after the distribution dateJuly 28, 2006 will remain exercisable until the earlier of three years following his termination of employment and the original expiration date of such awards). Options granted prior to the distribution will remain exercisable in accordance with Mr. Holmes’ prior agreement with the Company. The Holmes Wyndham Agreement will also provide him and his dependents with medical benefits through his age 75.

The employment agreement will provideprovides Mr. HolmesSalerno with the right to claim a constructive discharge if, among other things, he is not the Chief Executive Officer and the most senior executive officer of the Wyndham, or does not report directly to the Board of Directors; or there occursfollowing a “corporate transaction” (as such term is defined in Mr. Holmes’Salerno’s employment agreement); or Wyndham notifies. Mr. Holmes that Wyndham will not extend the term of the employment agreement for an additional fourth year or, following the expiration of the employment agreement, Wyndham does not offer to extend the agreement for a period of at least two but no more than four years on substantially similar terms; or Wyndham fails to nominate Mr. Holmes to be a member of Wyndham’s Board of Directors. Mr. Holmes’Salerno’s agreement will provide for post-termination non-competition and non-solicitation covenants which will last for two years following Mr. Holmes’Salerno’s employment with Wyndham (subjectus. Mr. Salerno has a right pursuant to certain exceptions).

Mr. Smith. The Company entered into an amended and restatedhis employment agreement with Mr. Smith as of June 2, 2001, which was further amended and restated as of June 30, 2004 (the “Smith Employment Agreement”). The Smith Employment Agreement has a two year term but with automatic one-year extensionsto be reimbursed from the company for any “golden parachute” excise tax, including taxes on each anniversary of the effective date. Such extensions occur unless either party provides written notice to the other party at least thirty days prior to any such anniversary. The Smith Employment Agreement isreimbursement, subject to earlier termination upon certain events.limitations described in his employment agreement.

David B. Wyshner

The Smith Employment Agreement provides that during his term ofMr. Wyshner’s employment Mr. Smith will be paid an annual base salary equal to $762,500 and will be eligible for annual bonuses based on a target of 200% of annual base salary. This level of base salary was not increased during 2003, 2004 or 2005. Mr. Smith is entitled to

continued medical, dental and life insurance benefits following his termination of employment through the year he attains age 62. Mr. Smith is eligible to participate in all of the Company’s other compensation and employee benefit plans or programs and to receive officer perquisites.

The Smith Employment Agreement provides that if Mr. Smith’s employment is terminated by the Company other than for Cause (as defined in the Smith Employment Agreement), the Company will pay Mr. Smith a lump sum cash payment equal to 300% of his base salary plus target incentive bonus (for purposes of such severance formula, target bonus will not exceed 100% of base salary). In addition, each of Mr. Smith’s outstanding options granted after June 1, 2001 will become fully vested and remain exercisable until the first to occur of the fifth anniversary of the date of such termination and the original expiration date of such option. In addition, Mr. Smith and his eligible dependents will remain covered under certain welfare benefit plans sponsored by the Company until Mr. Smith reaches age 75 (such benefit plan eligibility will cease if Mr. Smith accepts employment with a competitor of the Company’s Real Estate Services Division). Further upon any such termination of employment or upon Mr. Smith’s resignation, each of his options granted on or after September 1, 1998 and prior to December 31, 2000 will remain outstanding until the first to occur of the fifth anniversary of the date of such termination and the original expiration date of such option.

In connection with the Separation Plan, the Compensation Committee approved Realogy entering into an agreement with Mr. Smith, which will become effective as of the date of the Realogy distribution (the “Smith Realogy Agreement”) and Realogy and Mr. Smith have entered into such agreement.

The Smith Realogy Agreement will havehas a term ending on the third anniversary of the distribution;effective date; provided that such term will automatically extend for one additional year unless Realogywe or Mr. SmithWyshner provides notice to the other party of non-renewal at least six months prior to such third anniversary. Pursuant to Realogy’s by-laws, its Board of Directors may terminate Mr. Smith’s employment at any time. Upon expiration of the employment agreement, Mr. Smith will be an employee at will unless the agreement is renewed or a new agreement is executed.

In addition to providing for a minimum base salary of $1 million$525,000 and employee benefit plans generally available to Realogy’sour executive officers, the Smith Realogy Agreement will provideMr. Wyshner’s agreement provides for an annual incentive award with a target amount equal to 200%100% of his base salary, subject to attainment of performance goals, and grants of long-term incentive awards, upon such terms and conditions as determined by Realogy’sour Board of Directors or Compensation Committee. The Smith Realogy Agreement will provideMr. Wyshner’s agreement provides that if his employment with Realogyus is terminated by Realogyus without “cause” or due to a “constructive discharge” (each term as defined in the Smith Realogy Agreement)Mr. Wyshner’s agreement), he will be entitled to a lump sum payment equal to 299% of the sum of his then-current base salary plus his then-current target annual bonus. In addition, in this event, all of Mr. Smith’sWyshner’s then-outstanding Realogy equity awards will become fully vested (and any Realogy stock options and stock appreciation rights granted on or after the distribution dateJuly 28, 2006 will remain exercisable until the earlier of three years following his termination of employment and the original expiration date of such awards). Options granted prior to the distribution will remain exercisable in accordance with

The employment agreement provides Mr. Smith’s prior agreement with the Company. The Smith Realogy Agreement will also provide him and his dependents with medical benefits through his age 75. The Smith Realogy Agreement will provide Mr. SmithWyshner with the right to claim a constructive discharge if, among other things, (i) a person other than Mr. Silverman becomes Realogy’s Chief Executive Officer, (ii) prior to December 31, 2007, Mr. Smith does not report to the Chief Executive Officer of Realogy, (iii) following December 31, 2007, Mr. Smithhe is not the Chief Executive Officer of Realogy or does not report directly to Realogy’s Board of Directors, (iv) Realogy fails to nominate Mr. Smith to be a member of Realogy’s Board of Directors, or (v) Realogy notifies Mr. Smith that Realogy will not extend the termmost senior financial officer of the Company or there occurs a “corporate transaction” (as such term is defined in Mr. Wyshner’s employment agreement for an additional fourth year.agreement). Mr. Smith’sWyshner’s agreement will provide for post-termination non-competition and non-solicitation covenants which will last for two years following Mr. Smith’sWyshner’s employment with Realogy.

Other Agreements. During 2003, each Named Executive Officer (other thanus. Mr. Silverman) executedWyshner has a letter agreement amending and clarifying certain terms of their employment with the Company and amending their respective employment agreements. Each letter agreement provided the Company with the officer’s consent

to terminate the officer’s existing split dollar life insurance arrangement and provided the Company the right to recoup the policy value, capped the amount of annual bonus that would be considered in calculating an officer’s contractual severance pay (100% of earned base salary), and limited and clarified the types of benefits that would be provided pursuant to a contractual severance event. The Company determined that these amendments were necessary and appropriate and, in connection with the officers’his employment agreement with these changes, the Company amended its annual bonus program for the Named Executive Officers (other than Mr. Silverman) to increase the bonus target to 200% of earned base salary (175% for Mr. Buckman). The changes to the annual bonus program included a shift to clear, performance-based criteria relating to the officer’s business units, the Company on the whole, capital expenditure efficiency and personal performance measures.

Officer Stock Ownership Guidelines. During 2003, the Corporate Governance Committee recommended, and the Board of Directors approved, stock ownership guidelines requiring senior officers of the Company to acquire designated levels of Common Stock over a four year period and hold such Common Stock during all periods thereafter. The value of the Common Stock required to be held relatesreimbursed from the company for any “golden parachute” excise tax, including taxes on any reimbursement, subject to limitations described in his employment agreement.

Mark Servodidio

Mr. Servodidio’s severance agreement provides that if his employment is terminated by us other than “for cause” (as defined in Mr. Servodidio’s severance agreement), disability or death, he will receive a factor of the designated officer’s base salary and position. Effective October 15, 2007 (or, for officers hired subsequent to such date, effective on the fourth anniversary of their hire date), the Chief Executive Officer will be required to hold Common Stock equal to 600% of his or her then current annual rate of base salary; each designated officer reporting to the Chief Executive Officer will be required to hold Common Stock equal to 300% of his or her then current annual rate of base salary; and each designated Corporate Executive Vice President and each Business Unit Chief Executive Officer will be required to hold Common Stocklump-sum severance payout equal to 200% of his or her then current annual rate of base salary.

Other Change of Controlsalary plus target incentive bonus and Termination Provisions. The Company adopted a tax gross up programperquisites to include car usage, financial planning and health coverage for a limited numberperiod of executive officers, including each Named Executive Officer, which24 months. Severance is subject to and contingent upon execution of a separation agreement containing a release of claims against the Company and non-competition covenants. The agreement also provides for similar excise tax reimbursementsa lump sum cash payment for the ratable portion of golden parachute excise taxes under Section 4999stock-based awards which would have been expensed in accordance with their original vesting schedule by the one-year anniversary of the Internal Revenue Code in the event a future corporate event causes an excise tax liability. Certain Named Executive Officers also have similar protections under their employment agreements.termination of employment.

John T. McClain

Stock OptionsPursuant to an agreement with us, Mr. McClain is our Senior Vice President and Restricted Stock Units. Generally, all stock options granted to each ofChief Accounting Officer and has additional responsibility for overseeing several functions associated with our legacy as the Named Executive Officers under any applicable stock plan of the Company will become fully and immediately vested and exercisable, and all restricted stock units will vest, upon the occurrence of a change of control transaction of the Company.

The Company expects that, in connection with the Separation Plan, stock options relating to the Company’s common stock will be equitably adjusted such that, following the Separation Plan, each optionee will hold three separate options, one relating to the Company’s common stock, one relating to Realogy common stock and one relating to Wyndham Worldwide common stock. Such equitable adjustment is expected to be made such that immediately following each of the Realogy and Wyndham Worldwide distributions, (i) the number of shares relating to the Realogy and Wyndham Worldwide options, respectively, will be equal to the numbers of sharesformer parent company of Realogy, Wyndham and Wyndham Worldwide common stockTravelport. Over time, it is likely that the option holder would have received in the related distribution had the Company option shares represented outstanding sharesscope of the Company’s common stock (i.e. a ratio of one share of Realogy common stock for each four shares of the Company’s common stock and one share of Wyndham Worldwide common stock for each five shares of the Company’s common stock), and (ii) the per share option exercise price of the original Company stock optionthis position will be proportionally allocated among the three types of stock options based upon the relative per share trading prices of the Company, Realogy and Wyndham Worldwide immediately following the related distributions.

The Company expects that each holder of restricted stock units (including the Company, Realogy, Wyndham Worldwide and Travelport employees) will be issued a number of restricted stock units relating to Realogy and Wyndham Worldwide stock, equal to the number of shares of Realogy and Wyndham Worldwide common stock that such holder would receive in the Realogy and Wyndham Worldwide distributions assuming the restricted stock units relating to the Company’s common stock represented actual shares of common stock

(i.e. a ratio of one unit relating to Realogy common stock for every four units relating to the Company’s common stock and a ratio of one unit relating to Wyndham Worldwide common stock for every five units relating to the Company’s common stock).

Code Section 409A. The federal tax laws recently were amended to impose additional limitations on certain types of deferred compensation.diminish as legacy activities subside. In the event that any payment under the programs and policies discussed above would result in an imposition of tax under the tax provisions, the Company intendsand Mr. McClain do not, between September 1, 2007 and December 31, 2007, identify mutually acceptable opportunities for Mr. McClain to acttake on new or additional responsibilities and/or continue handling existing responsibilities, or in the event that Mr. McClain is terminated without cause prior to modify any such paymentsDecember 31, 2007, Mr. McClain will be eligible to avoid impositioninitiate severance with 30 days notice provided Mr. McClain executes an agreement and general release in a form acceptable to us.

Mr. McClain’s severance is comprised of such tax to(a) a lump-sum payment of two times current base salary plus the extent permissible under applicable law.

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in anypro-rated portion of the Company’s previous filingsannual target incentive award, (b) post-termination exercisability of stock options for three years, (c) a lump sum in cash for the ratable portion of Mr. McClain’s 2006 stock-based award, which would have been expensed in accordance with its original vesting schedule by the first anniversary of Mr. McClain’s termination of employment and (d) a lump sum in cash for the ratable portion of any subsequent stock-based award, which would have been expensed in accordance with its original vesting schedule by the date of Mr. McClain’s termination of employment. From and after the date of Mr. McClain’s termination of employment, we will provide Mr. McClain and his family continued coverage under the Securities Actour group health plans for a period of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act12 months. This severance is not applicable if Mr. McClain is terminated for cause.

Termination, Severance and Change of 1934 that might incorporate future filings, including this Proxy Statement, in whole or in part, the following compensation committee report on executive compensation and performance graph shall not be incorporated by reference into any such filings.

Compensation Committee Report on Executive CompensationControl Arrangements

The table below shows the potential severance payments for each named executive officer. All payments are contingent on the executive’s termination of employment and the identified triggering events.

Name and Triggering Event(a)

  Lump Sum
Severance
Payment
($)(b)
  Accelerated
Vesting of
Stock-based
Awards
($)(c)
  

Continuation
of Benefits and
Perquisites

($)(d)

  

Excise Tax
and Gross-
Up

($)(e)

Mr. Nelson

        

Resignation or Termination by Company for Cause

  0  0  222,703  

Termination due to Death or Disability

  0  2,666,807  222,703  

Termination by Company without Cause or due to Constructive Discharge

  7,475,000  2,666,807  222,703  

Change of Control Transaction and Termination by Company without Cause or due to Constructive Discharge

  7,475,000  2,666,807  222,703  2,992,216

Mr. Wyshner

        

Resignation or Termination by Company for Cause

  0  0  0  

Termination due to Death or Disability

  0  1,926,021  70,512  

Termination by Company without Cause or due to Constructive Discharge

  3,139,000  1,926,021  70,512  

Change of Control Transaction and Termination by Company without Cause or due to Constructive Discharge

  3,139,000  2,222,336  70,512  0

Mr. Salerno

        

Resignation or Termination by Company for Cause

  0  0  0  

Termination due to Death or Disability

  0  2,963,122  59,908  

Termination by Company without Cause or due to Constructive Discharge

  4,186,000  2,963,122  59,908  

Change of Control Transaction and Termination by Company without Cause or due to Constructive Discharge

  4,186,000  3,555,750  59,908  0

Mr. Servodidio

        

Resignation or Termination by Company for Cause

  0  0  0  

Termination by Company without Cause

  1,225,000  222,236  36,791  

Change of Control Transaction and Termination by Company without Cause

  1,225,000  888,943  36,791  N/A

Mr. McClain

        

Resignation or Termination by Company for Cause

  0  0  0  

Termination by Company without Cause

  913,500  133,339  16,993  

Change of Control Transaction and Termination by Company without Cause

  913,500  533,357  16,993  N/A

(a)Messrs. Silverman, Buckman and Holmes are not entitled to any additional severance payments. “Without Cause Termination” and “Constructive Discharge” are defined in each individual agreement. Mr. Nelson’s agreement was filed as an exhibit to our 8-K filing on June 30, 2006. Agreements for Mr. Salerno and Mr. Wyshner were filed as exhibits to our 8-K filing on November 11, 2006. Agreements for Mr. McClain and Mr. Servodidio were filed as exhibits to our 2006 Form 10-K.
(b)The lump sum severance benefits were calculated based on each executive’s base salary and target annual incentive as of December 31, 2006 and a multiplier of 299% or 200% as per the terms of each agreement.
(c)The value of accelerated vesting of stock-based awards was calculated assuming vesting was accelerated as of December 31, 2006 and based on the closing price of our stock ($21.69) on December 29, 2006.
(d)For Mr. Nelson, reflects the continuation of benefit and perquisite plans he participates in as of December 31, 2006 until age 75. For the other named executive officers, other than Mr. McClain, reflects 24 months of continued health, dental and car benefits. For Mr. McClain reflects 12 months of continued health and dental benefits.
(e)Estimated assuming change of control transaction and termination of employment occurred on December 31, 2006 at a stock price of $21.69 and reflecting an assigned value attributable to Mr. Nelson’s future noncompetition obligation. We estimate that the amount would be reduced to zero if the same transaction were analyzed as occurring on January 1, 2007 rather than December 31, 2006.

Director Compensation Table

The first table below shows the compensation provided to our current non-employee directors for 2006. The second table below shows the compensation provided during the first eight months of 2006 to our former non-employee directors who served as directors of Cendant during 2006 solely until completion of the separation.

Current Directors

Name*

  

Fees Earned
or Paid In
Cash for
Service
Prior to
Cendant
Separation

($)(a)

  Fees Earned
or Paid In
Cash for
Service
Following
Cendant
Separation
($)(a)
  

Stock
Awards
for Service
Prior to
Cendant
Separation

($)(b)

  Stock
Awards
for Service
Following
Cendant
Separation
($)(b)
  All Other
Comp
($)
  Total
($)

Coleman, Leonard S.

  79,184  27,083  47,492  102,083  7,330(c)(d) 263,172

Edelman, Martin L.

  72,858  24,250  44,485  99,250  42,430(c) 283,273

Rosenberg, Sheli Z.

  84,530  —    51,481  126,667  12,484(c)(d) 275,162

Sweeney, Stender E.

  —    —    —    128,629  5,000(d) 133,629

Krominga, Lynn

  —    12,157  —    87,157  —    99,314

*Mary Choksi did not serve as a director in 2006.

Former Directors

Name

  Fees Earned
or Paid In
Cash
($)(a)
  Stock
Awards
($)(b)
  All Other
Comp
($)
  

Total

($)

Biblowit, Myra J.

  72,932  43,742  1,208(c) 117,882

Herrera, George

  68,764  41,247  —    110,011

MacBain, Louise T. Blouin

  66,688  39,991  —    106,679

Mills, Cheryl D.

  78,345  46,989  10,000(d) 135,334

Mulroney, Brian

  28,000  84,000  30,007(c)(d) 142,007

Nederlander, Robert E.

  72,943  43,738  146,735(c) 263,416

Pittman, Robert W.

  26,667  84,000  12,947(c) 123,614

Richards, Pauline D.E.

  79,192  47,485  —    126,677

Smith, Robert F.

  85,439  51,241  170,276(c)(d) 306,956

(a)A full description of all fees paid to Avis Budget Group directors is provided below. The cash portion of fees paid represents: 50% of the annual retainer and 50% of committee chair and membership stipends together with the deferred cash payment described at the end of footnote (b) below.
(b)

The stock awards represent: 50% of the retainer and 50% of committee chair and membership stipends, which are paid quarterly in deferred Common Stock, and a new director grant awarded to the current directors upon completion of the Cendant Separation, in the case of Messrs. Coleman and Edelman and Ms. Rosenberg and on the first day of service for Mr. Sweeney and Ms. Krominga. Amounts set forth represent the amount expensed in 2006 under SFAS No. 123R. Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in Note 18 to our audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 included in our 2006 Form 10-K. The number of shares of Common Stock to be received pursuant to the common stock portion of the retainer or any other compensation to be paid in the form of Common Stock is equal to the value of the compensation being paid in the form of Common Stock, divided by the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date of grant. Each share of deferred Common Stock entitles the Non-Employee Director to receive one share of Common Stock immediately following such director’s retirement or termination of service from the Board for any reason. The Non-Employee Directors may not sell or receive value from any shares of deferred Common Stock prior to such termination of service. Directors may elect to receive more than 50% of their retainer and stipends in deferred Common

Stock. Ms. Rosenberg and Mr. Sweeney have elected as of August 23, 2006 to receive all of their compensation in deferred Common Stock. Messrs. Mulroney and Pittman made such election for all of 2006. Directors may be permitted to receive value from shares deferred in excess of 50% of their retainer and stipends. The stock portion of the final payment of fees to Cendant directors immediately prior to the Cendant Separation was made in the form of deferred cash for administrative purposes.

(c)Represents premiums for term life insurance coverage. Following completion of the Cendant Separation, the Company no longer provides this program.
(d)Represents discretionary matching contributions available through The Avis Budget Charitable Foundation (formerly known as The Cendant Charitable Foundation). For the former directors who received such contribution and Ms. Rosenberg, represents $10,000, and for Messrs. Sweeney and Coleman represents $5,000.

The table below shows the Director Compensation provided to non-employee directors prior to completion of the Cendant Separation as members of the Cendant Board and Director Compensation provided for the members of the Avis Budget Board after completion of the Cendant Separation. While the Cendant Board reduced director compensation effective upon completion of the separation, after completing a competitive review of director compensation provided at companies of comparable size to Avis Budget in the vehicle rental and other industries, the Avis Budget Board further reduced such compensation and adopted the Director Compensation shown in the table below for 2007, retroactive to the completion of the separation (other than with respect to the vesting terms of the one-time new director grant).

    Annual Compensation
Prior to the Cendant
Separation($)(a)(b)
  Annual Compensation
Following the Cendant
Separation($)(a)(b)
 

Annual Director Retainer(c)

  160,000  125,000 

One-Time New Director Equity Grant(d)

  75,000  75,000 

Audit Committee Chair

  30,000  20,000 

Audit Committee Member

  20,000  10,000 

Compensation Committee Chair

  25,000  15,000 

Compensation Committee Member

  10,000  7,500 

Corporate Governance Committee Chair

  15,000  10,000 

Corporate Governance Committee Member

  8,000  5,000 

Executive Committee Member

  10,000  8,000 

Presiding Director Stipend

  20,000  20,000 
  Life Insurance(e) 

Other Benefits

  10,000(f) 5,000(f)

(a)Members of the Board of Directors who are also officers or employees of the Company or any of its subsidiaries do not receive compensation for serving as directors (other than travel-related expenses for meetings held outside of the Company’s headquarters).
(b)The committee chair stipends and all committee membership stipends are paid 50% in cash and 50% in deferred Common Stock. Directors may elect to receive more than 50% of such stipends in deferred Common Stock.
(c)The annual retainer is paid on a quarterly basis. The retainer is paid equally 50% in cash and 50% in shares of deferred Common Stock. A director may elect to receive the entire retainer in the form of deferred Common Stock. The number of shares of Common Stock to be received pursuant to the common stock portion of the retainer or any other compensation to be paid in the form of Common Stock is equal to the value of the compensation being paid in the form of Common Stock, divided by the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date of grant. Each share of deferred Common Stock entitles the Non-Employee Director to receive one share of Common Stock immediately following such Director’s retirement or termination of service from the Board for any reason. The Non-Employee Directors may not sell or receive value from any shares of deferred Common Stock prior to such termination of service.

(d)The grant is to be made in the form of deferred Common Stock. The number of shares granted is equal to $75,000 divided by the fair market value of a share of Common Stock as of the close of business on the date of the grant. Persons serving as Non-Employee Directors at the time of the completion of the Cendant Separation received their grant as of the first trading day following completion of the Cendant Separation. Future grants will be provided to directors newly appointed to the Board. Effective as of January 1, 2007, grants awarded after January 1, 2007 will vest ratably over three years, or in the event of a change in control, but Directors may not sell or receive value from the shares until termination from the Board.
(e)The Company provided $100,000 of term life insurance coverage for each Non-Employee Director. In addition, the Company provided each director with the ability to obtain life insurance in the amount of $1 million on his or her life. Certain, but not all, directors participated in this program. Upon the death of such director while still in office, the Company would donate an aggregate of $1 million to one or more charitable organizations that such director served or supported. Following completion of the Cendant Separation, the Company no longer provides this program.
(f)Represents discretionary matching contributions available through The Avis Budget Charitable Foundation.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

Our Compensation Committee is composed entirely of the Board of Directors is responsible for administeringindependent directors and administers the Company’s executive compensation policies and programs. TheSheli Z. Rosenberg (Chairman) and Leonard Coleman have served as members of our Compensation Committee also reviews and approves the salaries and bonusessince August 23, 2006. Lynn Krominga has served as a member of executive officers and certain other officers as well as all grants of long term incentive and equity-based compensation awards to all employees.

Executive Officer Compensation Policy. The Company’s executive officer compensation policies include:

aligning the interests of executive officers with the long-term interests of stockholders;

providing highly-competitive levels of compensation which are, in large part, conditioned on the attainment of specified performance targets and/or stock price appreciation; and

attracting, motivating and retaining the highest level of executive talent for the benefit of stockholders.

Committee Charter. In an effort to enhance corporate governance and clarify the role of theour Compensation Committee with respect to carrying out the foregoing policies, the Boardsince January 30, 2007. From August 23, 2006 through January 30, 2007, Martin Edelman was also a member of Directors adopted a Charter of the Compensation Committee (the “Charter”) in February 2003. The Charter provides that the Compensation Committee must consist of directors who are independent of management and free from any relationship that, in the opinion of the Board of Directors, would interfere with the exercise of their independent judgment as a Compensation Committee member, as well as independent as defined under various rules and regulations applicable to compensation committees. The Charter expressly provides that the Compensation Committee shall, among other things, evaluate its own performance on an annual basis.

Access to Senior Management. The members of the Compensation Committee have direct access to appropriate members of senior management, and this access is used for discussions regarding proposed compensation arrangements, plans and policies to assure that decisions regarding executive officer compensation are appropriate. The Compensation Committee believes that its direct access to senior management has improved its effectiveness and has led to the adoption of policies and initiatives which have increased the alignment of key employees and stockholders, including the implementation of performance-based vesting with respect to long term incentive awards discussed below.

Compensation Levels Generally and Culture. The Compensation Committee recognizes that the compensation levels for the Named Executive Officers are at a level which may be above the averages of the Company’s peer competitors. However, the Committee also recognizes that above-average compensation levels serve the interests of the Company and its stockholders by attracting and retaining the highest caliber of

management talent and by promoting a culture of energy, entrepreneurialism, competitiveness and dedication, which in turn facilitates the attainment of annual growth and profitability targets. The Compensation Committee believes that management talent has been and will continue to be a competitive advantage for the Company. The Compensation Committee also acknowledges that senior management tries to maintain and enhance a performance-based culture among its employees, and the Compensation Committee gives appropriate consideration to this strategic policy when performing its duties.

Separation Plan. In 2005, in connection with the Separation Plan, the Compensation Committee approved and the Company implemented compensation programs in order to provide financial incentives for key employees to remain employed with the Company (the “Separation Retention Program”). The program included both cash retention bonuses that would be paid to designated key employees so long as such employees remained employed until the completion of both of the Realogy and Wyndham Worldwide distributions. Designated employees included those individuals who were expected to lose their jobs in connection with the Separation Plan as well as those assigned to a new position with a separated company, but primarily included individuals whose position, duties and responsibilities were deemed critical towards continuing business operations while at the same time incurring additional duties relating to separating the various companies. In addition, the Compensation Committee approved accelerated vesting of outstanding equity awards for all current employees as follows: (i) all outstanding equity awards that would vest subject to the attainment of “above target” performance goals would terminate and (ii) all other outstanding equity awards would vest on the thirtieth day following the distributions of Realogy and Wyndham Worldwide by the Company. The Compensation Committee determined that these programs were necessary to assure the Company’s continuing business operations and prevent the departure of key employees during the separation process.

Employment Agreements. Each Named Executive Officer is employed by the Company pursuant to a written agreement of employment. Each employment agreement separately reflects the terms that the Compensation Committee believed was appropriate and/or necessary to retain the services of the particular executive officer, within the framework of the Company’s compensation policies. A limited number of other executive officers of the Company are also employed pursuant to employment agreements. Substantially all employment agreements entered into by the Company provide the Company with protection in the form of restrictive covenants, including non-competition, non-solicitation and confidentiality covenants, for the benefit of the Company. The Compensation Committee has considered the advisability of using employment agreements and determined that under certain circumstances it is in the best interests of the Company insofar as it permits the Company to achieve its desired goals of retaining the best possible executive talent and obtaining post employment non-competition covenants from executive officers. During 2004, the Committee engaged a compensation consultant to review the Company’s use of employment agreements. The review provided parameters to determine the appropriateness of the use of employment agreements. In all cases, use of employment agreements would be limited to executive officers, and also in special situations such as to secure the services of key employees who become Company employees in connection with acquisitions, to secure restrictive covenants from key employees who have the ability to become competitive threats to the Company, or to retain key employees during transition periods in connection with their termination of employment so that replacement personnel may transition in an orderly manner. The employment agreements with the Named Executive Officers are described more fully under “Employment Contracts and Termination, Severance and Change of Control Arrangements”.

Components of Executive Compensation. The material elements of executive compensation arrangements include base salary, annual profit-sharing bonus and long term equity incentive awards.

Base Salaries. The Compensation Committee is responsible for determining the salary of the Chief Executive Officer and the other senior executive officers, which includes approval of their employment agreements containing the terms of their compensation. Salaries paid to executive officers, other than the Chief Executive Officer, are also reviewed annually by the Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Vice President — Human Resources. The Compensation Committee and such officers assess salary levels based upon

the nature of the position and the contribution, experience and tenure of the executive officer and based upon economic factors, peer company data and personal achievements. The salary levels of the Named Executive Officers are subject to the provisions of their respective employment agreements, which are approved by the Compensation Committee. From time to time,January 1, 2006 through August 23, 2006, the Compensation Committee was comprised of Robert Smith (Chairman), Myra Biblowit and the Company perform market research and/or engage compensation consultants to advise on market rates of compensation for similarly situated executive officers. The Compensation Committee considers such advice and surveys in connection with establishing salaries for executive officers. For 2003 and 2004, the Compensation Committee determined to freeze the base salaries of the Named Executive Officers at 2002 levels. For 2005, the Compensation Committee determined to continue this salary freeze.

Annual Bonus. Mr. Silverman is entitled to an annual performance bonus based upon the terms of his employment agreement. In 2002, Mr. Silverman entered into the Amended Silverman Agreement which provided a bonus formula calculated as 0.60% of the Company’s pre-tax income as defined in the Amended Silverman Agreement, with a limit on the amount of bonus equal to $100,000 per each cent of the Company’s earnings per share. During 2004, Mr. Silverman and the Company agreed to amend Mr. Silverman’s bonus formula in connection with the settlement of a stockholder derivative action. Although the formula described above remains in effect, all amounts above 150% of Mr. Silverman’s earned base salary are subject to the Company’s attainment of specific goals relating to growth in adjusted diluted earnings per share as defined in the Second Amendment. A description of Mr. Silverman’s employment agreement and amendments thereto related to the settlement are described under “Employment Contracts and Termination, Severance and Change of Control Arrangements.”

Each other Named Executive Officer is entitled to an annual performance bonus based upon the terms of their respective employment agreements, with bonus targets equal to 200% of earned base salary in the applicable fiscal year. Such bonus payments are subject to the approval of the Compensation Committee and based upon the performance of the Company and/or the applicable business units being managed by the officer, as well as such other performance criteria determined by the Company in connection with its overall strategic plans. Performance is measured against pre-established performance goals and the officer’s individual performance subjectively determined by the Chief Executive Officer. The performance goals are adjusted each year to coincide with overall strategy of the Company. With respect to 2005, the Compensation Committee determined to pay bonuses at below-target levels primarily in light of the Company’s financial performance and the need to take impairment charges related to the Company’s travel distribution services businesses. The bonuses paid to the Named Executive Officers for their 2005 performance are set forth under “— Summary Compensation Table.”

Long Term Equity Incentive Awards. In 2002 and prior years, equity awards were primarily granted in the form of options to purchase shares of Company common stock. Effective January 1, 2003, the Company determined to substantially curtail the issuance of stock options and altered its eligibility policy to reduce the number of employees who received incentive awards. Accordingly, for 2003, long term equity incentive awards were granted substantially in the form of restricted stock units. In 2004, the Company further aligned the interests of employees with stockholders by conditioning the vestingMs. Rosenberg. None of such awards on the attainment of financial performance goals relating to total shareholder returns referred to as “total unit growth” or “TUG,” rather than using solely time-based vesting. This approach continued for 2005. In 2006, no vesting of TUG-based awards occurred in respect of the 2004 and 2005 grants at the time of their scheduled vesting dates due to the Company’s failure to attain TUG targets; however, a portion of these awards are expected to accelerate in connection with the Separation Retention Program described above.

The Compensation Committee administers each of the Company’s stock plans. Grants made in 2005 to the Named Executive Officers, and all other officers and key employees, were approved by the Compensation Committee after discussion with the Executive Vice President, Human Resources, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Executive Officer. Eligibility for stock awards, the number of shares underlying each award and the terms and conditions of each award are determined by the Compensation Committee after input from the Human

Resources function, and the senior executive of each division and business unit. From time to time, the Human Resources department and/or the Compensation Committee will engage outside consultants to gain a deeper understanding of competition in local and global labor markets to assure that the grants are competitive and provide appropriate incentive and retention value.

Although the Prior Silverman Agreement provided Mr. Silverman with a contractual right to annual stock option grants covering two million shares of Common Stock, the Compensation Committee determined to terminate this right when the Amended Silverman Agreement was executed. Mr. Silverman has not received an equity award since 2001. Additional information with respect to grants of performance-based restricted stock units in 2005 to the Named Executive Officers is set forth in the “Summary Compensation Table.”

Chief Executive Officer Compensation. The compensation paid to Mr. Silverman during 2005 was based upon the levels set forth in his employment agreement with the Company. Mr. Silverman did not receive a base salary increase in 2005, 2004 or 2003, notwithstanding his right to an annual increase under his employment agreement. Also, Mr. Silverman has not received an equity grant since 2001. Mr. Silverman’s annual bonus, which is disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table, was determined based on a formula set forth in his employment agreement (as amended to make a portion of such bonus subject to the attainment of performance goals relating to the growth of the Company’s adjusted diluted earnings per share pursuant to the settlement of a stockholder derivative action).

Deductibility of Compensation. In accordance with Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, the deductibility for federal corporate tax purposes of compensation paid to certain individual executive officers of the Company in excess of $1 million in any year may be restricted. The Compensation Committee believes that it is in the best interests of the Company’s stockholders to meet the requirements for deductibility of Section 162(m), while still maintaining the goals of the Company’s compensation programs. Accordingly, where it has been deemed necessary and in the best interests of the Company to continue to attract and retain the best possible executive talent, and to motivate such executives to achieve the goals inherent in the Company’s business strategy, the Compensation Committee has approved compensation to executive officers which exceeds the limits of deductibility.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Robert F. Smith (Chair)

Myra J. Biblowit

Sheli Z. Rosenberg

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

The Compensation Committee is comprised of Mr. Smith (Chairman) and Mses. Biblowit and Rosenberg, none of whomDirectors were officers or employees of the Company or any of the Company’s subsidiaries or had any relationship requiring disclosure by the Company under Item 404 of the SEC’s Regulation S-K during 20052006 or before.before, except for Mr. Edelman. Mr. Edelman is Of Counsel to Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, LLP, a New York City law firm (successor to Battle Fowler). Paul, Hastings represented the Company in certain matters in 2006. It is expected that Paul, Hastings will continue to represent the Company in connection with certain matters from time to time in the future. Amounts paid by the Company to Paul, Hastings in 2006 constituted less than 1% of Paul, Hastings’ gross revenue for such year.

Performance GraphSECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS

The following graph assumes $100 invested ontable provides information about shares of Common Stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options and restricted stock units under all of our existing equity compensation plans as of December 31, 20002006. The table excludes 850,000 shares of Common Stock approved by stockholders issued or available for issuance pursuant to the 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

No securities will remain available for future issuance under any equity compensation plan other than the securities reflected in the first column below upon approval of the proposal to approve the Avis Budget Group, Inc. 2007 Equity and compares Incentive Plan.

Plan Category

  Number of Securities to
be Issued Upon Exercise
of Outstanding Options,
Warrants, Rights and
Restricted Stock Units (d)
  Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
(Excludes Restricted
Stock Units) ($) (e)
  Number of Securities
Remaining Available for
Future Issuance Under
Equity Compensation
Plans (Excluding
Securities Reflected in
First Column)

Equity compensation plans approved by Company stockholders(a)

  6,740,762  $28.98  4,911,657

Equity compensation plans not approved by Company stockholders(b)(e)

  5,243,079  $24.34  5,899,598

Equity compensation plans assumed in mergers, acquisitions and corporate transactions(c)

  99,611  $17.81  1,345,331

Total

  12,083,452  $27.04  12,156,586

(a)Includes options and other awards granted under the following plans: 1997 Stock Incentive Plan; 1997 Stock Option Plan; and 1987 Stock Option Plan. Each plan was approved by stockholders with respect to an initial allocation of shares. Subsequent to such approvals and prior to the Cendant Separation, the Board of Directors approved the allocation of additional treasury shares for issuance under the plans (which are included in the table) without further stockholder approval as follows: 1997 Stock Incentive Plan (2,000,000); 1997 Stock Option Plan (6,997,079); 1987 Stock Option Plan (1,000,000).
(b)Includes options and other awards granted under the following plans: 1999 Broad-Based Employee Stock Option Plan; 1997 Employee Stock Plan; 1992 Employee Stock Option Plan; 1992 Bonus and Salary Replacement Stock Option Plan; and stand-alone option grants to former officers. Substantially all options remaining available for future grants are under the 1999 Broad-Based Employee Stock Option Plan. The material terms of these plans are set forth under footnote (e) below. Notwithstanding the terms of these plans to the contrary, no option granted under any of these plans provides for a term in excess of 10 years or an exercise price below fair market value as of the date of grant (other than options assumed or replaced in connection with acquisitions). All options granted under these plans have been approved by the Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.
(c)Includes options granted under the following plans: Galileo International, Inc. 1999 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan; and Trendwest Resorts, Inc. 1997 Employee Stock Option Plan. We have assumed additional option plans in connection with mergers, acquisitions and corporate transactions pursuant to which no shares remain available for future grants. There were 1,227,853 outstanding options under such plans as of December 31, 2006. The weighted-average exercise price for these options is $27.63.
(d)Reflects an equitable adjustment of stock options and restricted stock units in connection with the spin-off of PHH Corporation to our stockholders during 2005 and the distributions of Realogy and Wyndham in 2006. Also reflects the one-for-ten reverse stock split completed in September 2006.
(e)Following are the material terms of plans not submitted for stockholder approval:

1999 Broad-Based Employee Stock Option Plan. This plan provides for the yearly percentagegrant of stock options, shares of Common Stock and other awards valued by reference to Common Stock to our employees who are not executive officers. Shares issued pursuant to the exercise of options granted under this plan may be authorized and unissued shares or treasury shares. In the event of any change in corporate capitalization, any reorganization of our company or a similar event, shares subject to outstanding options, the Company’s cumulative total stockholder return on the Common Stock (as measured by dividing (i) the sumexercise price of (A) the cumulative amount of dividends (including the PHH distribution as further described below), assuming dividend reinvestment, during the five years commencing on the last trading day before January 1, 2001, and ending on December 31, 2005, and (B) the difference between the Company’s share price at the endoutstanding options and the beginningnumber and type of shares remaining to be made subject to options under this plan may be adjusted or substituted for, as the periods presentedCompensation Committee or Board may determine. The terms and conditions of options granted under this plan are to be determined by (ii) the shareCompensation Committee, provided, that the exercise price atof an option may not be less than the beginning of the periods presented) with (b) (i) the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index and (ii) the Standard & Poor’s Diversified Commercial Services Index.

On January 31, 2005, the Company distributed allfair market value of the shares covered thereby on the date of common stockgrant. Each option granted under this plan will become immediately exercisable upon a “change-of-control transaction” (as defined in the plan). Unless otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee, following termination of PHH Corporation held by itemployment, options granted under this plan generally will remain exercisable, to the holdersextent exercisable at the time of termination, for one year (two years, in the case of retirement, death or disability).

1997 Employee Stock Plan. This plan provides for the grant of awards of stock options, stock appreciation rights (payable in cash or shares or a combination thereof) and restricted stock to our employees and affiliates. Shares issued pursuant to awards granted under this plan may be authorized and unissued shares or treasury shares. In the event of any change in corporate capitalization, any reorganization of our company or a similar event, shares subject to outstanding awards, the exercise price of outstanding options and the number and type of shares remaining to be made subject to awards under this plan may be adjusted or substituted for, as the Compensation Committee or Board may determine. The terms and conditions of awards granted under this plan are to be determined by the Compensation Committee, provided, that the exercise price of an option may not be less than the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on a pro rata basis. The Company distributed one share of PHH’s common stock for every twenty shares of the Company’s common stock outstandingcovered thereby on the record date of grant. Under this plan, stock appreciation rights may be granted only in tandem with an option, and will be cancelled to the extent the related option is exercised or cancelled. The vesting of restricted stock awards granted under this plan may be subject to the attainment of predetermined performance goals. Unless otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee, following termination of employment, options and stock appreciation rights granted under this plan generally will remain exercisable, to the extent exercisable at the time of termination, for one year (two years, in the distribution.

LOGOcase of retirement, death or disability). Unless otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee, following termination of employment for any reason, shares that are subject to restrictions under a restricted stock award will be immediately forfeited.

Report of Audit CommitteeREPORT OF AUDIT COMMITTEE

The Audit Committee oversees the Company’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board of Directors. Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process, including the system of internal controls. The independent auditors are responsible for performing an independent audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and issuing a report thereon. The Committee reviews and oversees these processes, including oversight of (i) the integrity of the Company’s financial statements, (ii) the Company’s independent auditors’ qualifications and independence, (iii) the performance of the Company’s independent auditors and the Company’s internal audit function and (iv) the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.

In this context, the Committee met and held discussions with management and the independent auditors. Management represented to the Committee that the Company’s consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and the Committee reviewed and discussed the consolidated financial statements with management and the independent auditors. The Committee also discussed with the independent auditors the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61 (Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, AU 380), as amended.

In addition, the Committee discussed with the independent auditors the auditors’ independence from the Company and its management, and the independent auditors provided to the Committee the written disclosures and letter required from the independent auditors by the Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1 (Independence Discussions With Audit Committees).

The Committee discussed with the Company’s internal and independent auditors the overall scope and plans for their respective audits. The Committee met with the internal and independent auditors, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examinations, the evaluations of the Company’s internal controls, and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting.

Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Committee recommended to the Board of Directors, and the Board has approved, that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20052006 for filing with the SEC. The Committee and the Board also have recommended, subject to stockholder ratification, the selection of the Company’s independent auditors for fiscal year 2006.2007.

AUDIT COMMITTEE

Pauline D.E. Richards,Stender E. Sweeney, Chairman

Robert F. Smith

Cheryl D. MillsLynn Krominga

Sheli Z. Rosenberg*

* At the time this report was approved, Ms. Rosenberg was a member of the Audit Committee. Her role was subsequently assumed by Ms. Choksi.

PROPOSALS TO BE VOTED ON AT MEETING

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

[PROPOSAL NO. 1]1

The Board of Directors has nominated (A) if the Separation Plan has not been completed prior to or as of the date of the Meeting, Messrs. Silverman, Buckman, Coleman, Edelman, Hererra, Holmes, Mulroney, Nederlander, Nelson, Pittman and Smith and Mses. Biblowit, MacBain, Mills, Richards and Rosenberg (the “Present Directors”) to be elected at the Meeting to serve as Directors for a one-year term ending at the 2007 annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are duly elected and qualified or (B) if the Separation Plan has been completed prior to or as of the date of the Meeting, Messrs. Nelson, Coleman, Edelman, Salerno and Sweeney and Ms.Mses. Choski, Krominga and Rosenberg to be elected at the Meeting to serve as Directorsdirectors for a one-year term of one-year ending at the 20072008 annual meeting of stockholders orand until their successors are duly elected and qualified. In either case, allAll nominees will be current Directorsare currently directors of the Company as of the date of the Meeting.Company. For certain information regarding each nominee and continuing directors, see “Board of Directors — Directors—Biographical Information for Nominees” above.

If the Present Directors are elected at the Meeting to serve as Directors because the Separation Plan has not been completed prior to or as of the date of the Meeting, upon completion of the Separation Plan, all such Directors other than Messrs. Nelson, Coleman and Edelman and Ms. Rosenberg are expected to resign, the number of Directors is expected to be decreased to six and Messrs. Salerno and Sweeney are expected to be appointed as new Directors all in accordance with the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation and by-laws.

Each nominee has consented to being named in this Proxy Statement and to serve if elected. If, prior to the Meeting, any nominee should become unavailable to serve, the shares of Common Stock represented by a properly executed and returned proxy (whether through the return of the enclosed proxy card, by telephone or electronically through the Internet) will be voted for such additional person as shall be designated by the Board of Directors, unless the Board of Directors determines to reduce the number of Directorsdirectors in accordance with the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and by-laws.By-Laws.

Directors shall be elected by the affirmative vote of a plurality of the shares of Common Stock present at the Meeting, in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote in the election of Directors.directors. Under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, brokers who hold shares in street name will have discretion, on behalf of their clients that hold shares as of the record date, to vote on this proposal when the brokers do not receive instructions from beneficial owners. Pursuant to applicable Delaware law, in determining whether such nominees have received the requisite number of affirmative votes, abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH NOMINEE AS A DIRECTOR. UNLESS MARKED TO THE CONTRARY, PROXIES RECEIVED BY THE COMPANY WILL BE VOTED “FOR” THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES LISTED ABOVE.

RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF AUDITORS

[PROPOSAL NO. 2]2

Deloitte & Touche LLP has been appointed by the Board of Directors as the auditors for the Company’s financial statements for 2006.2007. A representative of Deloitte & Touche LLP is expected to be present at the Meeting and will have the opportunity to make a statement if he or she desires to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate questions of stockholders.

Principal Accounting Firm Fees. Fees billed to the Company by Deloitte & Touche LLP, the member firms of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, and their respective affiliates (collectively, the “Deloitte Entities”) for the years ended December 31, 20052006 and 20042005 were as follows:

Audit Fees. The aggregate fees billed for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 20052006 and 20042005 and for the reviews of the financial statements included in the Company’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and for other attest services primarily related to financial accounting consultations, comfort letters and consents related to SEC and other registration statements, regulatory and statutory audits and agreed-upon procedures were $20.3$19.6 million and $19.9$20.3 million, respectively.

Audit-Related Fees. The aggregate fees billed for audit-related services for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 and 2004 were $11.2$9.5 million and $9.9$11.2 million, respectively. These fees relate primarily to due diligence pertaining to acquisitions, audits for dispositions of subsidiaries and related registration statements, audits of employee benefit plans and accounting consultation for contemplated transactions for the fiscal years ended December 31, 20052006 and December 31, 2004.2005.

Tax Fees. The aggregate fees billed for tax services for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 and 2004 were $10.6$15.4 million and $10.4$10.6 million, respectively. These fees relate to tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning for the fiscal years ended December 31, 20052006 and December 31, 2004.2005.

All Other Fees. There were no other fees for the fiscal yearsyear ended December 31, 20052006 and 2004.2005.

The Audit Committee considered the non-audit services provided by the Deloitte Entities and determined that the provision of such services was compatible with maintaining the Deloitte Entities’ independence. The Audit Committee also adopted a policy prohibiting the Company from hiring the Deloitte Entities’ personnel at the manager or partner level, who have been directly involved in performing auditing procedures or providing accounting advice to the Company.Company, in any role in which such person would be in a position to influence the contents of the Company’s financial statements.

The Company’s Audit Committee is responsible for appointing the Company’s independent auditor and approving the terms of the independent auditor’s services. The Audit Committee has established a policy for the pre-approval of all audit and permissible non-audit services to be provided by the independent auditor, as described below.

All services performed by the independent auditor in 20052006 were pre-approved in accordance with the pre-approval policy and procedures adopted by the Audit Committee at its April 22, 2005October 26, 2006 meeting. This policy describes the permitted audit, audit-related, tax and other services (collectively, the “Disclosure Categories”) that the independent auditor may perform. The policy requires that prior to the beginning of each fiscal year, a description of the services (the “Service List”) anticipated to be performed by the independent auditor in each of the Disclosure Categories in the ensuing fiscal year be presented to the Audit Committee for approval.

Except as discussed below, anyAny requests for audit, audit-related, tax and other services not contemplated by the Service List must be submitted to the Audit Committee for specific pre-approval, irrespective of the amount,except for de minimis amounts under certain circumstances as described below, and cannot commence until such approval has been granted. Normally, pre-approval is provided at regularly

scheduled meetings of the Audit Committee. However, the authority to

grant specific pre-approval between meetings, as necessary, has been delegated to the Chairman of the Audit Committee. The Chairman will update the full Audit Committee at the next regularly scheduled meeting for any interim approvals granted.

On a quarterly basis, the Audit Committee reviews the status of services and fees incurred year-to-date as compared to the original Service List and the forecast of remaining services and fees for the fiscal year.

The policy contains a de minimis provision that operates to provide retroactive approval for permissible non-audit services under certain circumstances. No services were provided by the Deloitte Entities during 20052006 and 20042005 under such provision.

Although stockholder action on this matter is not required by the appointmentCompany’s By-laws or otherwise, the Board is submitting for stockholder ratification the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP is being recommended toas the stockholders for ratification.Company’s independent registered public accountants. Pursuant to applicable Delaware law, the ratification of the appointment of auditors of the Company requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock present, in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote on the proposal. Under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, brokers who hold shares in street name will have discretion, on behalf of their clients that hold shares as of the record date, to vote on this proposal when the brokers do not receive instructions from beneficial owners. Abstentions will be counted and will have the same effect as a vote against this proposal and broker non-votes (if any) will have no effect on the vote on this proposal.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THIS PROPOSAL.

THE REVERSE STOCK SPLIT PROPOSAL

[PROPOSAL NO. 3]

In connection with the Separation Plan, the Company is seeking approval of a one-for-ten reverse stock split of the Company’s Common Stock. If the reverse stock split proposal is approved, the Company intends to effect the one-for-ten reverse stock split promptly following the annual meeting by filing an amendment to its Certificate of Incorporation. The Company will not effect the reverse stock split, however, unless and until the Realogy and Wyndham Worldwide distributions have been completed. The full text of the stock split proposal is set forth in Annex C to this Proxy Statement. When the Company effects the one-for-ten reverse stock split, the Company’s stockholders will receive cash in lieu of fractional shares. For each fractional share, the Company will pay cash equal to the applicable fraction multiplied by the then fair value per share of Common Stock, as applicable, as determined by the Board of Directors of the Company. If this proposal is approved by stockholders and the Company effects the reverse stock split, the stockholders will thereafter be entitled to receive uncertificated shares of common stock representing the number of shares that they would be entitled to receive after giving effect to the reverse stock split. The Company will mail to each holder of Common Stock in certificated form a Letter of Transmittal with instructions that explain how stockholders can receive uncertificated shares of Common Stock to which they are entitled following the reverse stock split of the Company’s common stock. Unexchanged certificates will represent the number of full shares of reclassified Common Stock to which such holders are entitled, after giving effect to the one-for-ten reverse stock split and the redesignation, if approved at the Meeting. Holders of unexchanged certificates will not be entitled to receive any dividends or other distributions, including cash in lieu of fractional shares, payable by the Company after the the reverse stock split is effective, until the certificates have been surrendered together with a duly completed and executed Letter of Transmittal. Such dividends and distributions, if any, will be accumulated, and at the time of surrender of the certificates together with a duly completed and executed Letter of Transmittal, all such unpaid dividends or distributions will be paid without interest.

As of June 30, 2006, the Company had approximately 1 billion shares issued and outstanding. As of July 13, 2006, the closing price for the Company’s common stock on the New York Stock Exchange was $15.38. Realogy, Wyndham Worldwide and Travelport together represented approximately 70% of the Company’s revenue in 2005. The Company expects that, upon the distribution of the common stock of Realogy and Wyndham Worldwide to the Company’s stockholders, the price of the Company’s common stock will decline significantly. The common stock of each of Realogy and Wyndham Worldwide, which Cendant stockholders will receive in the distribution, is expected to be traded on the New York Stock Exchange. If this proposal is approved, the number of shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding would be reduced to approximately 100 million. The Company believes that the anticipated increase in its share price resulting from decreasing the number of shares of its common stock outstanding will encourage greater investor interest and result in enhanced marketability and liquidity of its common stock.

Brokerage houses and institutional investors often have internal policies and practices that either prohibit them from holding lower priced stock in their portfolios or function to make trades in lower priced stocks economically unattractive, thereby discouraging individual brokers from recommending lower priced stocks to their clients. Trading costs for lower priced stocks also generally represent a higher percentage of the stock price, which may make them less attractive to individual investors and institutions.

Pursuant to applicable Delaware law, the approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock entitled to vote on the proposal. Under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, brokers who hold shares in street name will have discretion, on behalf of their clients that hold shares as of the record date, to vote on this proposal when the brokers do not receive instructions from beneficial owners. Abstentions and broker non-votes (if any) will be counted and will have the same effect as a vote against this proposal.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THIS PROPOSAL.

PROPOSAL TO CHANGE THE NAME OF THE COMPANYAPPROVE AVIS BUDGET GROUP, INC. 2007 EQUITY AND INCENTIVE PLAN

[PROPOSAL NO. 4]3

In connection with the Separation Plan, the Company is seeking approval of a proposal to amend the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation to change the name of the Company from Cendant Corporation toGeneral

The Avis Budget Group, Inc. If2007 Equity and Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) was adopted by the proposalBoard on March 23, 2007, subject to change the nameapproval by stockholders. The purpose of the CompanyPlan is approved,to facilitate the Company intendsattraction and retention of key executive talent critical to effectour long-term success, to tie a significant portion of executives’ compensation to the name change soon afterperformance of our company, including long-term performance, to align compensation with shareholder interests and to provide Avis Budget with a strong long-term retention strategy. Upon stockholder approval of the Meeting by filing an amendment to its CertificatePlan, no further awards will be granted under any of Incorporation.our currently existing plans. The Company will not effect the name change, however, unless and until the Realogy and Wyndham distributions have been completed. The full text of the proposal to change the name of the CompanyPlan is set forth in Annex CB to this Proxy Statement.

FollowingStatement, and the completiondescription of the Realogy and Wyndham Worldwide distributions, the Company will be comprised of its vehicle rental operations of the Avis and Budget brands and its Travel Distribution Services businesses. Following completion of the Separation Plan the Company will be principally comprised of its vehicle rental operations of the Avis and Budget brands, and therefore, the Company believes that its name should be changed to Avis Budget Group, Inc. in order to more closely describe its operations.

Pursuant to applicable Delaware law, the approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock entitled to vote on the proposal. Under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, brokers who hold shares in street name will have discretion, on behalf of their clients that hold shares as of the record date, to vote on this proposal when the brokers do not receive instructions from beneficial owners. Abstentions and broker non-votes (if any) will be counted and will have the same effect as a vote against this proposal.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THIS PROPOSAL.

REDESIGNATION OF COMMON STOCK PROPOSAL

[PROPOSAL NO. 5]

In connection with the Separation Plan and the proposal to change the name of the Company from Cendant Corporation to Avis Budget Group, Inc., the Companyset forth herein is seeking approval of a proposal to amend its Certificate of Incorporation to redesignate its series of common stock presently designated as “Cendant Corporation-CD Common Stock”qualified in its Certificate of Incorporationentirely by reference to “Common Stock” and, to remove all references to the series of common stock defined as “Move.com Stock” The rights of the holders of the redesignated common stock are identical to the rights associated with Cendant Corporation-CD common stock. If the proposal is approved, the Company intends to effect the redesignation soon after the Meeting by filing an amendment to its Certificate of Incorporation. The Company will not effect the redesignation, however, unless and until the Realogy and Wyndham Worldwide distributions have been completed. The full text of the redesignation proposal is set forth in Annex CPlan.

The Plan will provide for the grant of equity-based awards, including restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock options, stock appreciation rights and other equity-based awards to this Proxy Statement. If this proposal is approved by stockholdersour non-employee directors, executive officers and other key employees, consultants, independent contractors, and other individuals who perform services for the Company effectswho are selected by our Compensation Committee for participation in the proposal,Plan. Currently, there are eight non-employee directors, nine executive officers, approximately 850 other key employees and no consultants, independent contractors or other individuals who perform services for the stockholders will thereafter be entitledCompany who are eligible to receive an uncertificated share of common stock for each share of Cendant Corporation-CD Common Stock that they currently hold, subject to the impact of the reverse stock split described in proposal no. 3, if approved.equity-based awards. The Company will mail to each holder of Common Stock in certificated form a Letter of Transmittal with instructions that explain how to return certificated shares of Common Stock to enable stockholders to receive uncertificated shares of Common Stock to which they are entitled following the redesignation and reverse stock split, if approved, of the Company’s common stock. Unexchanged certificates will represent the number of full shares of reclassified Common Stock to which such holders are entitled, after giving effect to the one-for-ten reverse stock split and the redesignation, if approved at the Meeting. Holders of unexchanged certificates will not be entitled to receive any dividends or other distributions, including cash in lieu of fractional shares, payable by the Company after the the reverse stock split is effective, until the certificates have been surrendered together with a duly completed and executed Letter of Transmittal. Such dividends and distributions, if any, will be accumulated, and at the time of surrender of the certificates together with a duly completed and executed Letter of Transmittal, all such unpaid dividends or distributions will be paid without interest.

In connection with the Company’s proposal to change its name from Cendant Corporation to Avis Budget Group, Inc., the Company believes that in order to avoid any potential confusion to investors, the designation of its common stock within its Certificate of Incorporation should be also be changed to remove references to “Cendant Corporation”. The Move.com Stock series was designated in connection with a proposed transaction in 2000 that was not completed. There has been no Move.com Stock outstanding since 2001, when all outstanding Move.com Stock shares were retired. Therefore, the Company believes the “Cendant Corporation-CD Common Stock” designation should be changed to “Common Stock” and all references to “Move.com Stock” should be removed from the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation.

Pursuant to applicable Delaware law, the approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock entitled to vote on the proposal. Under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, brokers who hold shares in street name will have discretion, on behalf of their clients that hold shares as of the record date, to vote on this proposal when the brokers do not receive instructions from beneficial owners. Abstentions and broker non-votes (if any) will be counted and will have the same effect as a vote against this proposal.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THIS PROPOSAL.

DECREASE OF AUTHORIZED SHARES PROPOSAL

[PROPOSAL NO. 6]

In connection with the Separation Plan and the reverse stock split proposal described in proposal no. 3, the Company is seeking approval of a proposal to amend its Certificate of Incorporation to decrease the number of authorized sharesvalue of the Company’s common stock as of March 22, 2007 was $27.81.

In order to 250 million shares. If the proposal is approved, the Company intends to effect the decrease inaddress potential shareholder concerns regarding the number of authorized sharesoptions, stock appreciation rights or stock awards we intend to grant in a given year, the Board of its common stock soon afterDirectors commits to our stockholders that for the Meeting by filing an amendment to its Certificate of Incorporation. The Companynext three fiscal years (commencing on January 1, 2007) it will not effect the decrease in thegrant a number of authorized shares subject to options, stock appreciation rights or stock awards to employees or non-employee directors greater than an average of its common stock unless and until2.31% of the reverse stock split described in proposal no. 3 has been approved by stockholders and completed. The full text of this proposal to decrease the authorized number of shares of the Company’sour common stock that we believe will be outstanding over such three year period. For purposes of calculating the number of shares granted in a year, stock awards will count as equivalent to (1) 1.5 option shares, if our annual stock price volatility is 53% or higher, (2) two option shares if our annual stock price volatility is between 25% and 52%, and (3) four option shares if our annual stock price volatility is less than 25%.

Administration

The Plan will be administered by our Compensation Committee, which will have the authority, among other things, to determine who will be granted awards and all of the terms and conditions of the awards. The Compensation Committee will also be authorized to determine to what extent an award may be settled, cancelled, forfeited or surrendered, to interpret the Plan and any awards granted thereunder and to make all other determinations necessary or advisable for the administration of the Plan. Where the vesting or payment of an award under the Plan is subject to the attainment of performance goals, the Compensation Committee will be responsible for certifying that the performance goals have been attained. Neither the Compensation Committee nor our Board has the authority under the Plan to reprice, or to cancel and re-grant, any stock option granted under the Plan, or to take any action that would lower the exercise, base or purchase price of any award granted under the Plan without first obtaining the approval of our stockholders.

Equity Incentive Programs

The maximum number of shares of common stock reserved for the grants of awards under the Plan shall be 8 million, subject to adjustment as provided in the Plan. The Plan places limits on the maximum amount of awards that may be granted to any participant in any plan year. Under the Plan, no participant may receive awards of stock options and stock appreciation rights that cover in the aggregate more than 1 million shares in any plan year. No more than 4 million shares of our common stock may be awarded under the Plan in the aggregate underlying awards other than options and stock appreciation rights. Shares issued under the Plan may be authorized but unissued shares or treasury shares.

If any shares subject to an award granted under the Plan are forfeited, cancelled, or surrendered or if an award terminates or expires without a distribution of shares, those shares of common stock will again be available for awards under the Plan. Shares of stock that are surrendered or withheld as payment of either the exercise price of an award or withholding taxes in respect of an award (including shares underlying a stock appreciation right that are retained by the Company to account for the grant price of the stock appreciation right) are no longer available for awards under the Plan. In the event that the Compensation Committee determines that any corporate event, such as a stock split, reorganization, merger, consolidation, repurchase or share exchange, affects our common stock such that an adjustment is appropriate in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of the rights of Plan participants, then the Compensation Committee will make those adjustments as it deems necessary or appropriate to any or all of:

the number and kind of shares or other property that may thereafter be issued in connection with future awards;

the exercise price or purchase price of any outstanding award;

the performance goals applicable to outstanding awards; and

the maximum number of shares that can be issued to any one participant in any one year.

The Compensation Committee will determine all of the terms and conditions of equity-based awards under the Plan, including whether the vesting or payment of an award will be subject to the attainment of performance goals. The performance goals that may be applicable to the equity incentive program under the Plan are as follows:

Return on total stockholder equity;

Earnings per share;

Net income (before or after taxes);

Earnings before any or all of interest, taxes, minority interest, depreciation and amortization;

Sales or revenues;

Return on assets, capital or investment;

Market share;

Cost reduction goals;

Implementation or completion of critical projects or processes;

Cash flow; and

Gross or net profit margin.

Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights

The terms and conditions of stock options and stock appreciation rights granted under the Plan will be determined by our Compensation Committee and set forth in Annex Can award agreement. Stock options granted under the Plan may be “incentive stock options,” or non-qualified stock options. A stock appreciation right confers on the participant the right to this Proxy Statement.

If Company’s reverse stock split proposal describedreceive an amount, in proposal no. 3 is approved and effectuated, the Company believes that there should be a decrease in the number of authorizedcash or shares of itsour common stock, byequal to the excess of the fair market value of a share of our common stock on the date of exercise over the exercise price of the stock appreciation right, and may be granted alone or in tandem with another award. The exercise price of a stock option or stock appreciation right granted under the Plan will not be less than the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant. The exercise price of a stock appreciation right granted in tandem with a stock option will be the same ratio (one-for-ten) within its Certificate of Incorporation.as the stock option to which the stock appreciation right relates.

Pursuant to applicable Delaware law, the approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote

The vesting of a majoritystock option or stock appreciation right will be subject to such conditions as the Compensation Committee may determine, which may include the attainment of performance goals but such vesting shall generally not occur prior to the first anniversary of the outstandingdate of grant.

Restricted Stock

The terms and conditions of awards of restricted stock granted under the Plan will be determined by our Compensation Committee and set forth in an award agreement. A restricted stock award granted under the Plan will consist of shares of Common Stock entitled to vote on the proposal. Under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, brokers who hold shares in street name will have discretion, on behalf of their clients that hold shares as of the record date, to vote on this proposal when the brokers do not receive instructions from beneficial owners. Abstentions and broker non-votes (if any) will be counted and will have the same effect as a vote against this proposal.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THIS PROPOSAL.

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL

[PROPOSAL NO. 7]

The Catholic Equity Fund, 1100 West Wells Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53233, owner of approximately 3,700 shares of the Company’sour common stock has given notice of its intention to present the following resolution at the 2006 Annual Meeting. CHRISTUS Health, 2600 North Loop West, Houston, Texas 77092 and Sisters of St. Joseph, Mount Saint Joseph Convent, 9701 Germantown Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19118, have indicated their intention to co-sponsor this proposal.

“WHEREAS:

Excessive CEO pay is now a matter of national concern and debate. We believe that any board that pays excessive CEO compensation fails in one of its most important duties. There is evidence that directors who enjoy high director compensation are more likely to pay excessive CEO compensation and that high director pay coupled with high CEO pay correlates with underperformance of the company. (Note 1) We believe that many employees regard excessive CEO compensation as a breach of trust and demeaning of their value as employees and human beings. We believe that directors who recommend excessive CEO pay packages should be held accountable. One way to do this is to allow shareholders to vote on the directors’ compensation.

There are indications that our board has not paid sufficient attention to CEO compensation:

1.In 2004, the CEO’s total compensation was $24 million. (Note 2) The average total compensation for CEOs of 367 leading corporations was $11.8 million. (Note 3) Based on total shareholder return, $100 invested in our company’s stock on 12/31/99 was worth about $90 on 12/31/04 compared to about $135 for the average S&P diversified commercial services company (Note 4).
2.Evaluation CEO pay relative to shareholder return on a scale of one to five, Business Week rated the company a one, the worst rating. (Note 5)
3.Forbes ranked the company 140th worst out of 189 companies in its measure of CEO performance versus CEO pay. (Note 6)
4.The Corporate Library’s Board Analyst Service gave the board a D for its overall effectiveness and an F for its compensation of the CEO. (Note 7)

RESOLVED,the shareholders request the following of the board:

1.Annually ask the shareholders to approve every future compensation package for non-employee directors, excluding any element to which the company is contractually bound as of the end of the 2006 annual meeting.
2.In its submission, identify every benefit and perquisite of serving as a director that involves an expenditure or use of company assets, including contributions to charities of particular interest to the director.
3.If the package receives at least half of the shareholder votes cast, make the package effective as of the effective date specified in the submission. If the package fails to receive at least half of the shareholder votes cast, leave the existing non-employee director compensation package in effect until the shareholders approve a different one.

Notes:

1.See Lucian Bebchuk and Jesse Fried,Pay Without Performance: The Unfulfilled Promise of Executive Compensation, Harvard University Press (2004), and Ivan E. Brick, Oded Palmon, and John K. Wald,CEO Compensation, Director Compensation, and Firm Performance: Evidence of Cronyism?,http://www.personal.psu.edu/faculty/j/k/jkw10/jcf_052705.pdf. (April 13, 2005).
2.2005 Proxy Statement.
3.Sarah Anderson et al.,Executive Excess 2005-12th Annual CEO Compensation Survey, http://www.faireconomy.org/press/2005/EE2005_pr.html (total includes options exercised but not options granted).

4.2005 Proxy Statement.
5.Business Week, April 18, 2005.
6.Forbes, http://www.forbes.com/2005/04/20/05ceoland.html.
7.Board Analyst, www.boardanalyst.com.”

Board of Directors’ Position

The Board of Directors recommends a vote “AGAINST” the above proposal.

As discussed above, in 2003, the Corporate Governance Committee undertook a study of director compensation (the “Director Compensation Review”) and adopted the following guidelines for director compensation: (i) compensation should fairly pay Directors for the work and time commitment required in a company of the same size and scope; (ii) compensation should align Director interests with the long-term interests of the Company’s stockholders; and (iii) the structure of compensation should be simple, transparent and easy for stockholders to understand. The Corporate Governance Committee retained an independent compensation consultant to assist the committee in formulating a new compensation structure to satisfy the new guidelines and to provide a written report verifying the reasonableness of such new compensation structure. As a result of such undertaking, the Corporate Governance Committee recommended, and the Board approved, a modified Non-Employee Director compensation program effective January 1, 2004. As a result of the Director Compensation Review, the Company eliminated the award of an annual equity incentive grant for its non-employee directors and elected to pay an annual retainer fee instead of a per meeting fee. The Company maintained a one-time grant of 5,000 shares of Common Stock for non-employee directors and paid members of the Separation Committee a per meeting fee. Approximately 50% of director compensation (including one-time grants for new non-employee directors and Committee fees) is paid in stock units that may not be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise encumbered, except as provided in the applicable award agreement or until such time as the restrictions applicable to the award lapse. Under the Plan, the Compensation Committee will have the authority to determine the participants to whom restricted stock will be granted and the terms and conditions of restricted stock awards, including whether the lapse of restrictions applicable to the award will be subject to the attainment of one or more performance goals but such lapse of restrictions shall generally not occur prior to the first anniversary of the date of grant.

Restricted Stock Units

A restricted stock unit is an award of a director’s retirementright to receive a share of our common stock. These awards will be subject to such restrictions on transferability and other restrictions, if any, as the Compensation Committee may impose at the date of grant or separationthereafter, which restrictions may lapse separately or in combination at such times, under such circumstances (including without limitation a specified period of service fromemployment or the Board.satisfaction of preestablished performance goals), in such installments, or otherwise, as the Compensation Committee may determine but such lapse of restrictions shall generally not occur prior to the first anniversary of the date of grant.

Dividends

The Compensation Committee may determine that the holder of restricted stock or restricted stock units may receive dividends (or dividend equivalents, in the case of restricted stock units) that may be deferred during the restricted period applicable to these awards.

Other Cash and Equity-Based Awards

The Plan will provide for other cash and equity-based awards, the form and terms of which will be as determined by the Compensation Committee, consistent with the purposes of the Plan. The vesting or payment of one of these awards may be made subject to the attainment of performance goals. The maximum amount that any participant may receive under a cash award for any annual performance period is three times base salary as of the beginning of the performance period.

Change in Control

The Plan will provide that, unless otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee at the time of grant, in the event of a change in control (as defined in the Plan), all awards granted under the Plan will become fully vested and/or exercisable, and any performance conditions will be deemed to be fully achieved.

Term; Amendment

No awards will be made under the Plan following the tenth anniversary of the date that the Plan becomes effective. Our Board may amend or terminate the Plan at any time, provided that the amendment or termination does not believeadversely affect any award that annualis then outstanding without the award holder’s consent. We must obtain stockholder approval of an amendment to the Plan if stockholder approval is required to comply with any applicable law, regulation or stock exchange rule.

New Plan Benefits

Future grants under the Plan will be made at the discretion of the Compensation Committee and, accordingly, are not yet determinable. In addition, the value of the awards granted under the Plan will depend on director compensationa number of factors, including the fair market value of our common stock on future dates and the exercise decisions made by the participants. Consequently, it is necessarynot possible to determine the benefits that might be received by participants receiving discretionary grants under the Plan.

Tax Consequences

The following summary is intended as a general guide to the United States federal income tax consequences relating to the issuance and exercise of stock options granted under the Plan. This summary does not attempt to describe all possible federal or desirable, givenother tax consequences of such grants or tax consequences based on particular circumstances.

Incentive Stock Options. An optionee recognizes no taxable income for regular income tax purposes as the result of the grant or exercise of an incentive stock option qualifying under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code (unless the optionee is subject to the alternative minimum tax). Optionees who neither dispose of their shares acquired upon the exercise of an incentive stock option (“ISO shares”) within two years after the stock option grant date nor within one year after the exercise date normally will recognize a long-term capital gain or loss equal to the difference, if any, between the sale price and the amount paid for the ISO shares. If an optionee disposes of the ISO shares within two years after the stock option grant date or within one year after the exercise date (each a “disqualifying disposition”), the optionee will realize ordinary income at the time of the disposition in an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the ISO shares at the time of exercise (or, if less, the amount realized on such disqualifying disposition) over the exercise price of the ISO shares being purchased. Any additional gain will be capital gain, taxed at a rate that depends upon the amount of time the ISO shares were held by the optionee. A capital gain will be long-term if the optionee’s holding period is more than 12 months. The Company will be entitled to a deduction in connection with the disposition of the ISO shares only to the extent that the elementsoptionee recognizes ordinary income on a disqualifying disposition of director compensation often do not change from yearthe ISO shares.

Nonstatutory Stock Options. An optionee generally recognizes no taxable income as the result of the grant of a nonstatutory stock option. Upon the exercise of a nonstatutory stock option, the optionee normally recognizes ordinary income equal to year; equitythe difference between the stock option exercise price and the fair market value of the shares on the exercise date. If the optionee is ana Company employee, such ordinary income generally is subject to withholding of income and employment taxes. Upon the sale of stock acquired by the exercise of a nonstatutory stock option, any subsequent gain or loss, generally based on the difference between the sale price and the fair market value on the exercise date, will be taxed as capital gain or loss. A capital gain or loss will be long-term if the optionee’s holding period is more than 12 months. The Company generally should be entitled to a deduction equal componentto the amount of non-employee director compensation, and material changes in equity compensation plans are already required to be submitted to shareholders under NYSE rules.

Directors of public companies are facing increased responsibilities, additional time commitments and increased potential liabilitiesordinary income recognized by the optionee as a result of the requirementsexercise of a nonstatutory stock option, except to the extent such deduction is limited by applicable provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, associated SEC and stock exchange rules and the current environment. In this environment, it is essential that the Company provide competitive director compensation to attract and retain individuals with the highest level of professionalism, experience and judgment and to ensure that the Board has the skills and leadership qualities necessary for the Company’s success. The process suggested in the proposal would not improve the governance of director compensation, and could have the effect of unduly impeding the Company’s ability to attract and retain qualified Directors.Internal Revenue Code.

Pursuant to applicable Delaware law, theThe approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock present, in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote on the proposal; provided, that the total vote cast on this proposal represents a majority in interest of all securities entitled to vote on this proposal. Under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, brokers who hold shares in street name will not have discretion, on behalf of their clients that hold shares as of the record date, to vote on this proposal when the brokers do not receive instructions from beneficial owners. Abstentions will be counted and will have the same effect as a vote against this proposal and broker non-votes will have no effect on the vote on this proposal.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS

THAT YOU VOTE “AGAINST” THIS PROPOSAL.

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL

[PROPOSAL NO. 8]

The Trowel Trades S&P 500 Index Fund, P.O. Box 75000, Detroit, Michigan 48275, owner of approximately 35,623 shares of the Company’s common stock, has given notice of its intention to present the following resolution at the 2005 Annual Meeting.

“RESOLVED: that the shareholders of Cendant Corporation (“the Company”) urge the Board of Directors to seek shareholder approval of future severance agreements with senior executives that provide benefits in an amount exceeding 2.99 times the sum of the executives’ base salary plus bonus. “Future severance agreements” include employment agreements containing severance provisions, retirement agreements and agreements renewing, modifying or extending existing such agreements. “Benefits” include lump-sum cash payments and the estimated present value of periodic retirement payments, fringe benefits, perquisites and consulting fees to be paid to the executive.

SUPPORTING STATEMENT

In our opinion, severance agreements as described in this resolution, commonly known as “golden parachutes”, are excessive in light of the high levels of compensation enjoyed by senior executives at the Company and U.S. corporations in general.

We believe that requiring shareholder approval of such agreements may have the beneficial effect of insulating the Board of Directors from manipulation in the event a senior executive’s employment must be terminated by the Company. Because it is not always practical to obtain prior shareholder approval, the Company would have the option if this proposal were implemented of seeking shareholder approval after the material terms of the agreement were agreed upon.

For those reasons, we urge shareholders to vote for this proposal.”

Board of Directors’ Position

The Board of Directors received this proposal for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on April 26, 2005 and recommended a vote “AGAINST” the proposal. This year, the Board of Directors again recommends a vote “AGAINST” the above proposal. As in the previous year, the Board does not believe that this proposal would enhance stockholder value and be in the best interests of the Company’s stockholders. To the contrary, the Board believes this proposal could hinder the Company’s flexibility to attract, motivate and retain the best leadership talent in today’s competitive environment and in the future.

Despite the Board’s opposition to this proposal, the Board does believe that any severance agreement exceeding 2.99 times the sum of an executive’s base salary plus bonus should only be used sparingly and only under extraordinary circumstances. As a result, in 2002, the Board adopted a policy that the Company would not enter into any future severance arrangements with any of its executive officers that provides a severance benefit exceeding 2.99 times such employee’s base salary plus target bonus unless extraordinary circumstances exist and the arrangement is approved by the Company’s non-management directors. Extraordinary circumstances exist only if the Company determines that it is necessary to exceed the threshold to obtain the services of an executive officer and when the benefits to the Company of obtaining such individual’s services outweigh the potential harm to stockholders of exceeding the threshold.

As a general matter, the Board of Directors, through its Compensation Committee, oversees compensation matters for the Company’s executive officers. The Board and the Compensation Committee exercise their fiduciary duties and oversight responsibilities in implementing compensation and severance arrangements that, in their view, are appropriate. The Compensation Committee, which is composed entirely of independent, non-employee directors, recognizes its responsibility to recommend executive compensation decisions that are in

the best interest of the Company and the long-term interests of the Company’s stockholders. The Compensation Committee has considered the advisability of using severance arrangements and determined that, under certain circumstances, they are in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders insofar as, among other reasons, they allow the Company to achieve its desired goals of retaining the best possible executive talent. The Board believes that it is ultimately in the stockholders’ best interests that the responsibility for this ongoing process continue to be vested in the Compensation Committee and the non-management Directors rather than being preempted and inhibited by the limitations such as those reflected in this proposal.

The Board and the Compensation Committee believe that the use of employment and severance agreements for a limited group of key executives is reasonable, appropriate and necessary. Such severance agreements are intended to ensure that the affected individuals are free from personal distractions in the context of a potential change of control, when the Board needs the objective assessment and advice of these executives to determine whether a bid is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. The agreements also are designed to attract and retain highly qualified executives and to motivate executives to maximize stockholder returns. Importantly, in exchange for an agreement to provide severance, the Company obtains valuable covenants to protect the Company such as non-competition and non-solicitation covenants from the executive. The number and type of agreements that the Company has with its executives are consistent with industry practice.

Finally, implementation of this proposal would be costly and disruptive for the Company. The adoption of the proposal would require the Company to either incur significant expense in calling a special stockholders’ meeting for the sole purpose of voting on this type of agreement or delay finalizing such an agreement until after its approval at the annual meeting of stockholders, harming the Company’s ability to recruit executive talent. This proposal suggests that stockholder approval for future severance agreements could be obtained after the material terms were agreed upon. The Board believes this is impractical and counterproductive. This proposal would place the Company at a competitive disadvantage in recruiting and retaining executive talent because severance agreements offered by the Company would be uncertain and therefore less valuable than competing offers provided by other companies, whose arrangements would be provided with final terms. The Board believes that it is in the best interest of the Company’s stockholders to provide the Board and the Compensation Committee the ability to make decisions with respect to severance arrangements and that the rigid and arbitrary limitations proposed are not necessary.

Pursuant to applicable Delaware law, the approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock present, in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote on the proposal. Under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, brokers who hold shares in street name will not have discretion, on behalf of their clients that hold shares as of the record date, to vote on this proposal when the brokers do not receive instructions from beneficial owners. Abstentions will be counted and will have the same effect as a vote against this proposal and broker non-votes will have no effect on the vote on this proposal.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS

THAT YOU VOTE “AGAINST”“FOR” THIS PROPOSAL.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Mr. Edelman is Of Counsel to Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, LLP, a New York City law firm (successor to Battle Fowler). Paul, Hastings represented the Companyus in certain matters in 2005.2006. It is expected that Paul, Hastings will continue to represent the Companyus in connection with certain Cendant contingent liability matters that are currently being handled by Paul, Hastings and certain other matters from time to time in the future.

Mr. Edelman is also a partner in Chartwell Hotels Associates (“Chartwell Hotels”). Chartwell Hotels owned an interest in four hotel properties franchised by wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company. During 2005, such hotel properties generated aggregate royalties of approximately $30,000 for the Company. In addition, Chartwell Hotels contributed marketing fund revenues of approximately $63,000future related to the Company, which are requiredour vehicle rental operations, however, we do not expect Paul, Hastings to be spent by the Companypaid more than $120,000 per year for marketing and reservation activities. Three of the hotel properties were sold to another investor and one property was transferred out of the Company’s lodging system, both in March of 2005.

Mr. Mulroney is a Senior Partner of Ogilvy Renault, a Montreal-based law firm. Ogilvy Renault represented the Company in certainvehicle rental-related matters in 2005. It is expected that Ogilvy Renault will continue to represent the Company in connection with certain matters from time to time in the future. Mr. Mulroney does not receive compensation for the services provided by Ogilvy Renault to the Company, and amountsAmounts paid by the Companyus to Ogilvy RenaultPaul, Hastings in 20052006 constituted less than 1% of Ogilvy Renault’sPaul, Hastings’ gross revenuesrevenue for such year.

In connection with the residential relocation of the Company’s Chief Administrative Officer, Linda C. Coughlin, the Company’s former relocation services subsidiary, Cendant Mobility (now known as Cartus Corporation), purchased her home in May 2005 for $1.75 million pursuant to the standard home-sale assistance terms utilized by Cartus in the ordinary course of business with third party customers of its relocation business.

Certain affiliates of Barclays Global Investors, N.A. (collectively, “Barclays”), an 8.88 %a 5.7% stockholder of Avis Budget Group based on a Schedule 13G filed by Barclays in January 20062007 and approximately one billion101,419,861 shares of CendantAvis Budget Group common stock outstanding on June 29, 2006,March 3, 2007, have performed, and may in the future perform, various commercial banking, investment banking and other financial advisory services for the Company and its subsidiariesus for which they have received, and will receive, customary fees and expenses. Fees paid to Barclays by us in 2006 were approximately $4.7 million, including interest and letter of credit fees paid to Barclays under our credit facilities.

Policy and Procedures with Respect to Related Person Transactions

The Company recognizes that transactions with related persons can present potential or actual conflicts of interest and create the appearance that Company decisions are based on considerations other than the best interests of the Company and its subsidiariesstockholders. Accordingly, as a general matter, it is the Company’s preference to avoid such transactions. Nevertheless, the Company recognizes that there are situations in 2005 werewhich transactions with related persons may be in, or may not be inconsistent with, the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. Therefore, the Company has adopted written procedures for the review, approval or ratification of transactions with related persons. The Company’s policy has been approved by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, and the Audit Committee will review and may amend this policy from time to time. For the purposes of this policy, a "Related Person Transaction" is a transaction, arrangement or relationship (or any series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships) in which the Company (including any of its subsidiaries) was, is or will be a participant, and in which any related person had, has or will have a direct or indirect interest.

Under our policy, Related Person Transactions that are identified as such prior to the consummation thereof or amendment thereto shall be consummated or amended only if proper notice of the facts and circumstances of such transaction has been given to the General Counsel and Corporate Compliance Officer and the Secretary of the Company. If such notice has been given, the Secretary will then assess whether the proposed transaction is a Related Person Transaction for purposes of the policy. If it is determined that the proposed transaction is a Related Person Transaction and the amount involved exceeds $120,000, the proposed Related Person Transaction will be submitted to the Audit Committee or, under certain circumstances, to the Chair of the Audit Committee (the "Chair"). The Audit Committee or the Chair will then consider all of the relevant facts and circumstances available to the Audit Committee or the Chair, provided that no member of the Audit Committee will participate in any review, consideration or approval of any Related Person Transaction with respect to which such member or any of his or her immediate family members is the related person. The Audit Committee or the Chair will approve only those Related Person Transactions that are in, or are not inconsistent with, the best interests of the Company and its stockholders, as the Committee or the Chair determines in good faith, and the Committee or the Chair, as applicable, will convey its decision to the General Counsel and Corporate Compliance Officer, who shall then convey the decision to the appropriate persons within the Company.

In the event the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer or General Counsel and Corporate Compliance Officer becomes aware of a Related Person Transaction for which the amount involved exceeds $120,000 that has not been previously approved or previously ratified under this policy, the transaction will be submitted to the Audit Committee or Chair. If the transaction is pending or ongoing, the Audit Committee

or the Chair will consider all the relevant facts and circumstances available to the Audit Committee of the Chair and shall evaluate all options, including but not limited to ratification, amendment or termination of the Related Person Transaction. If the transaction is completed, the Audit Committee or the Chair will evaluate the transaction to determine if rescission of the transaction and/or any other action is appropriate, and shall request that the General Counsel evaluate the Company’s controls and procedures to ascertain the reason the transaction was not submitted to the Committee or the Chair for prior approval and whether any changes to these procedures are recommended.

At the Audit Committee’s first meeting of each fiscal year, the Audit Committee will review any previously approved or ratified Related Person Transactions that remain ongoing and have a remaining term of more than six months or remaining amounts payable to or receivable from the Company of more than $60,000 and will determine if it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to continue, modify or terminate the Related Person Transaction.

Other than non-discretionary contributions made pursuant to the Company’s matching contribution program for employees and directors, proposed charitable contributions, or pledges of charitable contributions, in excess of $1,000, in the aggregate, by the Company to a charitable or non-profit organization identified by any related person as one in which such person is actively involved in fund-raising or otherwise serves as a director, trustee or in a similar capacity (a “Related Charity”) shall be subject to prior review and approval by the Audit Committee or, under certain circumstances, by the Chair. In addition, each “named executive officer” (as defined by SEC rules) shall report to the Secretary, and the Secretary shall consolidate the information and report to the Audit Committee, on a quarterly basis, charitable contributions in excess of $1,000, in the aggregate, by the Company’s named executive officers and their spouses to charitable or non-profit organizations identified as a Related Charity.

No immediate family member of a director or executive officer shall be hired as an employee (other than as a temporary intern, if approved by the General Counsel and Corporate Compliance Officer) of the Company unless the employment arrangement is approved by the Audit Committee or, under certain circumstances, by the Chair. In the event a person becomes a director or executive officer of the Company and an immediate family member of such person is already an employee of the Company, no material change in the terms of employment, including compensation, may be made without the prior approval of the Audit Committee (except, if the immediate family member is himself or herself an executive officer of the Company, any proposed change in the terms of employment shall be reviewed and approved in the same manner as other executive officer compensatory arrangements).

CENDANT SEPARATION AGREEMENTS

As of the close of business on July 31, 2006, Cendant completed the distribution to its stockholders of all of its shares of common stock of Realogy Corporation, then a wholly owned subsidiary of Cendant that holds directly or indirectly the assets and liabilities of Cendant’s former Real Estate Services businesses, and of Wyndham Worldwide Corporation, then a wholly owned subsidiary of Cendant that holds directly or indirectly the assets and liabilities of Cendant’s Hospitality Services (including Timeshare Resorts) businesses.

On August 23, 2006, Cendant completed the sale of its Travelport business that represented Cendant’s former Travel Distribution Services businesses for net proceeds of approximately $5 million.$4.1 billion, of which approximately $1.8 billion was used to repay indebtedness of Travelport. Pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement among the Separating Businesses (as defined below), during third quarter 2006, Cendant distributed approximately $1.4 billion and $760 million of such proceeds to Realogy and Wyndham, respectively.

Following the completion of the Cendant Separation, on August 29, 2006, our stockholders approved a change in our name from Cendant Corporation to Avis Budget Group, Inc. and a 1-for-10 reverse stock split of our common stock, each of which became effective on the New York Stock Exchange at the opening of the market on September 5, 2006 and, at that time, our ticker symbol changed to “CAR”.

Separation Related Transactions

In connection with the Cendant Separation, Plan,on July 27, 2006, we will enterentered into a series of agreements to formalize our business arrangements with Realogy, Wyndham Worldwide and Travelport (the “Separated Businesses”). Completion of the distributions will be subject to satisfaction or waiver by the Company of the conditions to the separation and distributions described below under “Separation and Distribution Agreement”. As described elsewhere in this Proxy Statement, certain of our executive officers and directors will become executive officers and/or directors of the Separated Businesses.

Consummation of the Separation Plan is subject to a number of uncertainties and the satisfaction or waiver of certain conditions precedent. Therefore, we cannot provide any assurance that the Realogy and Wyndham Worldwide distributions and the Travelport sale will be completed. The terms of the agreements described below that will be in effect following the Realogy and Wyndham Worldwide distributions have not yet been finalized; changes may be made prior to the Realogy and Wyndham Worldwide distributions. The Company expects to enter into these agreements prior to the Meeting, and the Company will file the material agreements related to the Separation Plan on a Form 8-K at the appropriate time.

Separation and Distribution Agreement

The Separation and Distribution Agreement will setsets forth agreements among the Company and the Separated Businesses regarding the principal transactions necessary to separate those businesses from the Company. It will also setsets forth other agreements that govern certain aspects of the ongoing relationships among the Company and the Separated Businesses after the completion of the Separation Plan. The parties intend to enter into the Separation and Distribution Agreement immediately before the Realogy and Wyndham Worldwide distributions, and the Separation and Distribution Agreement will become effective upon such distributions.Cendant Separation.

The Separation and Distribution Agreement will identifyidentifies assets to be transferred, liabilities to be assumed and contracts to be assigned to each of the Separated Businesses and the Company as part of the separation of the Company into four companies, and it will describedescribes when and how these transfers, assumptions and assignments will occur, although many of the transfers, assumptions and assignments may have already occurred prior to the parties’ entering into the Separation and Distribution Agreement. In particular, the Separation and Distribution Agreement will provideprovides that, subject to the terms and conditions contained in the Separation and Distribution Agreement:

 

All of the assets and liabilities (including whether accrued, contingent or otherwise) primarily related to the businesses and operations of the Company’s Real Estate Services segment will be retained by or transferred to Realogy or one of its subsidiaries;

 

All of the assets and liabilities (including whether accrued, contingent or otherwise) primarily related to the businesses and operations of the Company’s Hospitality Services (including Timeshare Resorts) segments will be retained by or transferred to Wyndham Worldwide or one of its subsidiaries;

 

All of the assets and liabilities (including whether accrued, contingent or otherwise) primarily related to the businesses and operations of the Company’s Travel Distribution Services segment will be retained by or transferred to Travelport or one of its subsidiaries;

 

All of the assets and liabilities (including whether accrued, contingent or otherwise) primarily related to the businesses and operations of the Company’s Vehicle Rental segment will be retained by or transferred to the Company or one of its subsidiaries;

 

Liabilities (including whether accrued, contingent or otherwise) related to, arising out of or resulting from businesses of the Company that were previously terminated or divested will be allocated amongst the parties to the extent formerly owned or managed by or associated with such parties or their respective businesses;

 

Realogy will assume 62.5% and Wyndham Worldwide will assume 37.5% (or, if the sale of Travelport is not completed, Realogy will assume 50%, Wyndham Worldwide will assume 30% and Travelport will assume 20%) of certain contingent and other corporate liabilities of the Company or its subsidiaries, which we refer to as assumed Cendant contingent and other liabilities, which are not primarily related to any of the respective businesses of a Separated Business and/or the Company’s vehicle rental business, in each case incurred on or prior to the earlier of (x) December 31, 2006 or (y) the date of the separation of Travelport from the Company; and

 

Realogy will be entitled to receive 62.5% and Wyndham Worldwide will be entitled to receive 37.5% (or, if the sale of Travelport is not completed, Realogy will be entitled to receive 50%, Wyndham Worldwide will be entitled to receive 30% and Travelport will be entitled to receive 20%) of the proceeds (or, in certain cases, a portion thereof) from certain contingent corporate assets of Cendant, which we refer to as Cendant contingent assets, which are not primarily related to any of the respective businesses of the Separated Businesses and/or the Company’s vehicle rental business, arising or accrued on or prior to the earlier of (x) December 31, 2006 or (y) the date of the separation of Travelport from the Company.

The Separation and Distribution Agreement will provideprovides that Realogy, Wyndham Worldwide and Travelport will incur indebtedness, establish and draw upon credit facilities, and transfer funds to the Company in amounts sufficient, in aggregate, to permit the Company to repay its corporate debt and, in the case of indebtedness incurred by Travelport, fund the actual and estimated cash costs and expenses of the Cendant Separation Plan borne by the Company relating to the Separationseparation (other than those primarily related to its vehicle rental business). Realogy is expecteddistributed to borrowthe Company approximately $2.225 billion at the time of its separation and Wyndham Worldwide is expectedtransferred to borrowthe Company approximately $1.360 billion at the time of its separation.

On June 30, 2006, the Company announced that it had entered into an agreement to sell Travelport to an affiliate of the Blackstone Group for $4.3 billion in cash. Pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement, the Company will agree to use its reasonable best efforts to effect the sale of Travelport. The Separation and Distribution Agreement provides thatrequired the Company willto contribute a significant portion of the gross cash proceeds from the sale of Travelport to the Separated Businesses for such companies to repay the initial indebtedness that they will incurincurred in connection with the separation. A portion of the gross cash proceeds (prior to the transfer of any such proceeds to the Separated Businesses) will bewere retained by the Company in an amount equal to the Company’s costs and taxes in connection with the sale and in an amount equal to the projected lost tax attributes as a result of such sale.

Except as otherwise may be provided in the Separation and Distribution Agreement or any ancillary agreement, each party will releasereleased and forever dischargedischarged each other party and its respective subsidiaries and affiliates from all liabilities existing or arising from any acts or events occurring or failing to occur or alleged to have occurred or to have failed to occur or any conditions existing or alleged to have existed on or before the separation from the Company of any such parties. The releases willdo not extend to obligations or liabilities under any agreements between the parties that remain in effect following the separation pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement or any ancillary agreement.

In addition, the Separation and Distribution Agreement will provideprovides for cross-indemnities principally designed to place financial responsibility for the obligations and liabilities of the Company’s vehicle rental business, Realogy’s business, Wyndham Worldwide’s business and Travelport’s business with the Company, Realogy, Wyndham Worldwide and Travelport, respectively.

The Separation and Distribution Agreement will provide:provides that:

 

Each party to the Separation and Distribution Agreement will assumeassumes the liability for, and control of, all pending and threatened legal matters related to its own business or assumed or retained liabilities and will indemnify the other parties for any liability arising out of or resulting from such assumed legal matters.

 

Except with respect to actions brought against the Company by a governmental entity (in which case the Company will act as managing party and will manage and assume control of such legal matters), Realogy will act as managing party and manage and assume control of all legal matters related to any assumed Cendant contingent and other liability or Cendant contingent asset. The party responsible for managing an assumed Cendant contingent and other liability or Cendant contingent asset shall be reimbursed for all out-of-pocket costs and expenses related thereto by Wyndham Worldwide, and, if the Company is acting as managing party, Realogy, in proportion to the applicable percentage that each such party is responsible for in respect of such liability or right to such asset. If either Realogy or Wyndham Worldwide defaults in payment of its portion of any assumed Cendant contingent and other liability or the cost of managing any Cendant contingent asset, the non-defaulting parties (including the Company and excluding Travelport if it is sold)Travelport) will be responsible for an equal portion of the amount in default (although any such payments will not release the obligation of the defaulting party). Additionally, the Separation and Distribution Agreement will provideprovides that if, as a result of a change of control or other extraordinary corporate transaction, either Realogy or Wyndham Worldwide were to suffer certain downgrades to its respective senior credit rating, then upon the demand of Realogy, Wyndham Worldwide or the Company, as applicable, any such party suffering such credit downgrade would be required to post a letter of credit or similar security obligation generally in respect of its portion of the remaining assumed Cendant contingent and other liabilities based on an appraisal prepared by a third party expert. If the sale of Travelport is not completed, Travelport will generally have similar rights or obligations to those of us with respect to assumed Cendant contingent and other liabilities and Cendant contingent assets and with respect to the matters described in this paragraph.

The Separation and Distribution Agreement will allocateallocates liabilities and responsibilities relating to employee compensation and benefit plans and programs and other related matters in connection with the separation of the

Company, including the treatment of certain outstanding and long-term incentive awards, existing deferred compensation obligations and certain retirement and welfare benefit obligations. The Separation and Distribution Agreement will provideprovides that Realogy and Wyndham Worldwide (and Travelport, if it is not sold) will guarantee each other’s (as well as the Company’s) obligations under our respective deferred compensation plans for amounts deferred in respect of 2005 and earlier years. The Separation and Distribution Agreement will provideprovides that outstanding Company stock options and restricted stock unit awards will be equitably adjusted in connection with the spin-offs of each distribution.of Realogy and Wyndham Worldwide.

Tax sharing agreementSharing Agreement

The Company will enterentered into athe Tax Sharing Agreement with the Separated Businesses that generally will governgoverns the parties’ respective rights, responsibilities and obligations after the completion of the Cendant Separation Plan with respect to taxes, including ordinary course of business taxes and taxes, if any, incurred as a result of any failure of the distributions of all of the stock of Realogy or Wyndham Worldwide (or Travelport if the sale of Travelport is not completed and the common stock of Travelport is distributed) to qualify as a tax-free distribution for U.S. federal income tax purposes within the meaning of Section 355 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Under theThe Tax Sharing Agreement, we expect, with certain exceptions, provides that:

 

for taxable years ending on or before December 31, 2006, (a) the Company generally will be responsible for the payment of income and non-income taxes attributable to our operations that we currently are obligated to pay on a separate return basis (i.e., not as part of a group of which the Company is the common parent); (b) each of the Separated Businesses generally will be responsible for the payment of income and non-income taxes attributable to its (or its subsidiaries) operations that it (or its subsidiaries) currently is obligated to pay on a separate return basis (i.e., not as part of a group of which the Company is the common parent); (c) Realogy generally will be responsible for the payment of 62.5% (or 50% and 20% for Realogy and Travelport, respectively, if the sale of Travelport is not completed), respectively, of all income and non-income taxes imposed on the Company and certain other subsidiaries the operations (or former operations) of which were determined by the Company not to relate specifically to its vehicle rental business or the businesses of Realogy, Wyndham Worldwide or Travelport or their respective subsidiaries; and (d) Wyndham Worldwide generally will be responsible for the payment of 37.5% (or 30% if the sale of Travelport is not completed) of all income and non-income taxes imposed on the Company and certain other subsidiaries, the operations (or former operations) of which were determined by the Company not to relate specifically to its vehicle rental business or the businesses of Realogy, Wyndham Worldwide or Travelport or their respective subsidiaries; and

 

subject to certain exceptions, audits relating to the Company and certain other subsidiaries the operations (or former operations) of which were determined by the Company not to relate specifically to the businesses of Realogy, Wyndham Worldwide, Travelport, the vehicle rental business or their respective subsidiaries for taxable years ending on or before December 31, 2006, will be settled by the Company in the sole discretion of Realogy (or at the direction of a majority of Realogy, Wyndham Worldwide and Travelport in the event that the closing of the sale of Travelport does not occur).Realogy. The Tax Sharing Agreement also requires Realogy and Wyndham Worldwide to indemnify the Company in the event that the settlement of any such audits results in adverse tax consequences to the Company relating to periods beginning after December 31, 2006 (such indemnity to be shared between Realogy and Wyndham Worldwide on a 62.5% and 37.5% basis, respectively, or between Realogy, Wyndham Worldwide and Travelport on a 50%, 30% and 20% basis, respectively, if the sale of Travelport is not completed)respectively); and

 

for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2007, the Company generally will be responsible for the payment of income and non-income taxes imposed on the Company and its direct or indirect subsidiaries.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, we currently expect that, under the Tax Sharing Agreement, the Company also will be generally be responsible for the payment of taxes, if any, that arise from (a) actions of or transactions

undertaken by the Company or one of its subsidiaries or any of its direct or indirect subsidiaries after the distribution of all of the stock of Realogy and Wyndham Worldwide which actions or transactions are not in the ordinary course of business and are not contemplated in connection with the Cendant Separation Plan or (b) the failure of the distribution

of the stock of each of the corporations owning the Separated Businesses to qualify as a tax-free distribution for U.S. federal income tax purposes within the meaning of Section 355 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, if such failure to qualify is attributable to the actions of or transactions undertaken by the Company or its direct or indirect subsidiaries after the distribution of the stock of Realogy and Wyndham Worldwide. The Tax Sharing Agreement will imposeimposes restrictions on the Company’s ability to engage (or the Company’s ability to cause its subsidiaries to engage) in certain actions following the completion of the Cendant Separation Plans and to setsets forth the Separated Businesses’ and the Company’s respective obligations with respect to the filing of tax returns, the administration of tax contests, assistance and cooperation and other matters.

Transition services agreementServices Agreement

The Company will enterentered into athe Transition Services Agreement with the Separated Businesses to provide the Separated Businesses with an orderly transition to being independent from the Company. Under the Transition Services Agreement, the Company will provide the Separated Businesses with various services, including services relating to human resources and employee benefits, payroll, financial systems management, treasury and cash management, accounts payable services,receivable, telecommunications services and information technology services. Under the Transition Services Agreement, the Company will receive services from the Separated Businesses. The cost of each transition service will be calculated using the same cost allocation methodologies for the particular service as those historically associated with such costs. The cost of each transition service will be based on either a flat fee or an allocation of the cost incurred by the company providing the service.

SECTION 16(A)16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s officers and Directors,directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership on Forms 3, 4 and 5 with the SEC and the NYSE. Officers, Directorsdirectors and greater than ten percent beneficial owners are required to furnish the Company with copies of all Forms 3, 4 and 5 they file.

Based solelyDue to administrative error, a Form 4 for Mr. Holmes was filed on August 21, 2006 two business days following the August 17, 2006 deadline. We also discovered that 97 shares of common stock, acquired from 2004 to 2006 by Ms. Rosenberg in connection with a dividend reinvestment program administered by the Company’s reviewtransfer agent, had been inadvertently omitted from Ms. Rosenberg’s reports of the copies of such forms it has received, the Company believes that all its officers, Directors and greater than ten percent beneficial owners complied with all filing requirements applicable to them with respect to transactions during 2005.changes in ownership. Such shares were reflected in Ms. Rosenberg’s most recent Form 4.

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR 20072008 ANNUAL MEETING

Proposals received from stockholders are given careful consideration by the Company in accordance with Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act. Stockholder proposals are eligible for consideration for inclusion in the proxy statement for the 20072008 annual meeting of stockholders if they are received by the Company on or before March 30, 2007, however, since the Company intends to hold its 2007 annual meeting more than 30 days from the date of its 2006 annual meeting, stockholder proposals will likely be eligible for consideration for inclusion in the proxy statement for the 2007 annual meeting of stockholders if they are received by the Company on or before a date to be set, and publicly disclosed in a Current Report on Form 8-K, by the Company. Such date will represent reasonable time before the Company begins to print and mail its proxy materials for the 2007 annual meeting.December     , 2007. Any proposal should be directed to the attention of the Corporate Secretary, Cendant Corporation, 9 West 57th Street,Avis Budget Group, Inc., 6 Sylvan Way, Parsippany, New York, New York 10019.Jersey 07054. In order for a stockholder proposal submitted outside of Rule 14a-8 to be considered “timely” within the meaning of Rule 14a-4(c), such proposal must be received by the Company not later than the last date for submission of stockholder proposals under the Company’s by-laws. In order for a proposal to be “timely” under the Company’s by-laws, it must be received not less than sixty (60) days nor more than ninety (90) days before the 2007anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual meeting of stockholders; provided, however, in the event that less than seventy (70)the annual meeting of stockholders is called for a date that is not within twenty-five (25) days noticebefore or prior public disclosure of theafter such anniversary date, of the meeting is given or made to stockholders, a proposalnotice by the stockholdersstockholder in order to be timely must be so received not later than the close of business on the tenth (10th) day following the dateday on which such notice of the date of the annual meeting of stockholders was mailed or such public disclosure of the date of the annual meeting of stockholders was made.made, whichever occurs first.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Shareholders with Multiple Accounts. The SEC has adopted rules that permit companies and intermediaries such as brokers to satisfy delivery requirements for proxy statements with respect to two or more stockholders sharing the same address by delivering a single proxy statement addressed to those stockholders. This process, which is commonly referred to as “householding,” potentially provides extra convenience for stockholders and cost savings for companies. The Company and some brokers household proxy materials, delivering a single proxy statement to multiple stockholders sharing an address unless contrary instructions have been received from the affected stockholders. Once you have received notice from your broker or from the Company that they or we will be householding materials to your address, householding will continue until you are notified otherwise or until you revoke your consent.

If, at any time, you no longer wish to participate in householding and would prefer to receive a separate proxy statement, please notify your broker if your shares are held in a brokerage account or the Company if you hold registered shares. You can notify the Company by sending a written request to Cendant Corporation, 9 West 57th Street,Avis Budget Group, Inc., 6 Sylvan Way, Parsippany, New York, New York 10019,Jersey 07054 Attention: Corporate Secretary.Secretary or by calling (973) 496-4700 and selecting the “Investor Relations” option.

Solicitation of Proxies. The accompanying form of proxy is being solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors of the Company. The expenses of solicitation of proxies for the Meeting will be paid by the Company. In addition to the mailing of the proxy material, such solicitation may be made in person or by telephone by Directors,directors, officers and employees of the Company, who will receive no additional compensation therefor.therefore. Upon request, the Company will reimburse brokers, dealers, banks and trustees, or their nominees, for reasonable expenses incurred by them in forwarding material to beneficial owners of shares of Common Stock. The Company has hired Mellon Investor Services LLC to aid in the solicitation of proxies. It is estimated that the fee for Mellon Investor Services will be approximately $13,500 plus reasonable out-of-pocket costs and expenses. Such fee will be paid by the Company.

Electronic Access to Proxy Statement and Annual Report. This Proxy Statement and the Company’s 20052006 annual report may be viewed online atwww.cendant.com.www.avisbudgetgroup.com. If you are a stockholder of record, you can elect to receive future annual reports and proxy statements electronically by marking the appropriate box on your proxy card, by following the instructions provided if you vote via the Internet or by telephone or by enrolling through the transfer agent’s website atwww.melloninvestor.com. If you choose this option, you will receive a proxy form in early-Augustearly-March listing the web site locations and your choice will remain in effect until you notify us by mail that you wish to resume mail delivery of these documents. If you hold your CendantAvis Budget Group, Inc. stock through a bank, broker or another holder of record, refer to the information provided by that entity for instructions on how to elect this option.

By Order of the Board of Directors

ERIC J. BOCKLOGO

JEAN M. SERA

Secretary

Dated: JulyApril     , 20062007

ANNEX A

CENDANT CORPORATIONAVIS BUDGET GROUP, INC.

DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE CRITERIA

A director who satisfies all of the following criteria shall be presumed to be independent.

 

Cendant

The Company does not currently employ, and has not within the last three years employed, the director or any of his or her immediate family members (except, in the case of immediate family members, in a non-executive officer capacity).

 

The director is not currently, and has not within the last three years been, employed by Cendant’sthe Company’s present auditors, nor has any of his or her immediate family members been so employed (except in non-professional capacity not involving Cendant’sthe Company’s business).

 

Neither the director, nor any of his or her immediate family members, is, or has been within the last three years, part of an “interlocking directorate” in which an executive officer of Cendantthe Company serves on the compensation (or equivalent) committee of another company that employs the director or his or her immediate family member as an executive officer.

 

The director is not a current employee, nor is an immediate family member a current executive officer, of a company that has made payments to, or received payments from, Cendantthe Company for property or services in an amount in any of the last three fiscal years, exceeding the greater of $750,000 or 1% of such other company’s consolidated gross revenues.

 

The director currently does not have, or had within the past three years, a personal services contract with Cendant,the Company, its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer or other executive officer.

 

The director has not received, and such director’s immediate family member has not received, during any twelve-month period within the last three years, more than $100,000 in direct compensation from Cendantthe Company (other than Cendant Board of Director fees).

 

The director is not currently an officer or director of a foundation, university or other non-profit organization to which Cendantthe Company within the last three years gave directly, or indirectly through the provision of services, more than the greater of (i) 1% of the consolidated gross revenues of such organization during any single fiscal year or (ii) $100,000.

For purposes of establishing director independence:

(i) a director is an “affiliate” of Cendantthe Company or its subsidiaries if such director serves as a director, executive officer, partner, member, principal or designee of an entity that, directly or indirectly, controls, or is controlled by, or is under common control with, Cendantthe Company or its subsidiaries;

(ii) an “immediate family member” includes a person’s spouse, parents, children, siblings, mothers and fathers-in-law, sons and daughters-in-law, brothers and sisters-in-law and anyone (other than domestic employees) who shares such person’s home;

(iii) “executive officer” means Cendant’sthe Company’s president, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, any vice president of Cendantthe Company in charge of a principal business unit, division or function, any other officer who performs a policy-making function or any other person who performs similar policy-making functions for Cendant;the Company; and

(iv) references to “Cendant”“the Company” in the foregoing criteria shall be deemed to include Cendant CorporationAvis Budget Group, Inc. and any subsidiary in a consolidated group with Cendant Corporation.Avis Budget Group, Inc.

The CendantAvis Budget Group Board will annually review all commercial and charitable relationships of directors. Whether directors meet these categorical independence criteria will be reviewed and will be made public annually prior to their standing for re-election to the CendantAvis Budget Group Board.

ANNEX B

AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTERAVIS BUDGET GROUP, INC.

2007 EQUITY AND INCENTIVE PLAN

      Page
  Section  
1.  Purpose; Types of Awards; Construction  1
2.  Definitions  1
3.  Administration  4
4.  Eligibility  5
5.  Stock Subject to the Plan  5
6.  Specific Terms of Awards  5
7.  Change in Control Provisions  8
8.  General Provisions  9


AVIS BUDGET GROUP, INC.

2007 EQUITY AND INCENTIVE PLAN

 

I.1.PurposePurpose; Types of Audit CommitteeAwards; Construction.

The purpose of the Audit Committee, whichAVIS BUDGET GROUP, INC. 2007 Equity and Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is partto promote the interests of the Board, shall be (a) to assistCompany and its Subsidiaries and the Board’s oversight of (i) the integritystockholders of the Company’s financial statements, (ii)Company by providing officers, employees, consultants and independent contractors (including non-employee directors) of the Company’s independent auditors’ qualificationsCompany and independence, (iii)its Subsidiaries with appropriate incentives and rewards to encourage them to enter into and continue in the employ or service of the Company or its Subsidiaries, to acquire a proprietary interest in the long-term success of the Company and to reward the performance of individuals in fulfilling their personal responsibilities for long-range and annual achievements. The Plan provides for the Company’s independent auditorsgrant, in the sole discretion of the Committee, of options (including “incentive stock options” and “nonqualified stock options”), stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units and other stock- or cash-based awards. The Plan is designed so that Awards granted hereunder intended to comply with the requirements for “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code may comply with such requirements, and the Company’s internal audit function, (iv)Plan and Awards shall be interpreted in a manner consistent with such requirements. Notwithstanding any provision of the Company’s compliancePlan, to the extent that any Award would be subject to Section 409A of the Code, no such Award may be granted if it would fail to comply with legalthe requirements set forth in Section 409A of the Code and regulatory requirements, and (v) the Company’s systems of disclosure controls and procedures, and internal controls over financial reporting, and (b) to prepare a report for inclusion in the Company’s annual proxy statement, in accordance with applicable law, regulation and listing standards.any regulations or guidance promulgated thereunder.

 

II.Composition of Audit Committee

The Audit Committee shall consist of not less than four members. Each member of the Audit Committee shall be appointed by the Board upon the recommendation of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee and shall satisfy the independence requirements of the New York Stock Exchange and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Act”) as appropriate, including the rules and regulations promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. To ensure that each Audit Committee member can devote the appropriate time to his/her oversight role, each member is limited to serving simultaneously on the audit committees of no more than three public companies.

The committee as a whole and each individual member must comply with the financial literacy requirements of the New York Stock Exchange. In accordance with the Act, the board will determine whether at least one member of the committee qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” in compliance with criteria established by the SEC. The existence of such a member, including his or her name and whether or not he or she is independent, will be disclosed in periodic filings as required by the SEC.

Vacancies on the Audit Committee shall be filled by majority vote of the Board at the next meeting of the Board following the occurrence of the vacancy. The members of the Audit Committee may be removed by a majority vote of the Board.

III.Authority and Responsibilities of Audit Committee

The following are the responsibilities of the Audit Committee:

A.2.Independent AuditorDefinitions.

Appoint, compensate, and oversee the work performed by the independent auditor for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or related work.

The independent auditor shall report directly to the Audit Committee and the Audit Committee shall oversee the resolution of disagreements between management and the independent auditor in the event that they arise.

Adopt and ensure compliance with a pre-approval policy with respect to services provided by the independent auditor.

Review and, in its sole discretion, approve in advance the services and terms of all audits and, as provided in the Act, all permitted non-audit services and relationships between the Company and the independent auditor. Approval of audit and permitted non-audit services may also be made by one or more membersFor purposes of the Audit Committee asPlan, the following terms shall be designated bydefined as set forth below:

(a) “Award” means any Option, Stock Appreciation Right, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Unit or Other Stock-Based Award or Other Cash-Based Award granted under the Audit Committee/the chairperson of the Audit Committee, provided that such designee report his/her approval to the Audit Committee at the next scheduled meeting.

Plan.

At least annually, obtain and review a report by the independent auditor describing: (a) all relationships between the independent auditor and the Company consistent with Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1: (b) material issues raised by the most recent internal quality control review“Award Agreement” means any written agreement, contract, or peer review,other instrument or by any inquiry or investigation conducted by governmental or professional authorities within the five preceding years, respecting one or more independent audits carried out by the independent auditor and any steps taken to deal with such issues; and document evidencing an Award.

(c) the independent auditor’s internal quality-control procedures.

Discuss the foregoing report by the independent auditor to the extent it discloses any material issues, relationships or services that may impact the performance, objectivity or independence of the outside auditor, including the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, and take, or recommend that the full board take, appropriate actions to oversee the independence of the outside auditor.

Evaluate, with the assistance of the Company’s management, the qualifications, performance and independence of the independent auditor, including the lead partner of the independent auditor and, if so determined by the Audit Committee, terminate the Company’s engagement of the independent auditor. Ensure that partner rotation practices are in compliance with all applicable SEC rules and other related laws and regulations.

Establish clear hiring policies, compliant with governing laws or regulations for employees or former employees of the independent auditor.

The Audit Committee should present its conclusions with respect to the above matters, as well as its review of the lead partner of the independent auditor to the Board.

B.Financial Reporting, Accounting Policies and Internal Control

Review the annual audited and quarterly financial statements with the Company’s management, its Disclosure Committee and the independent auditor, including the Company’s disclosures under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” Review other relevant reports or financial information submitted by the Company to any governmental body, or the public, including management certifications as required by the Act.

Receive and review: (1) any disclosure from the Company’s CEO or CFO made in connection with the certification of the Company’s quarterly and annual reports filed with the SEC and (2) management’s report and the auditor’s attestation related to the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Discuss with management and the auditor:

ºa) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; and

ºb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal controls.

Discuss the Company’s earnings press releases, including review of “pro-forma” or “adjusted” non-GAAP information, as well as financial information and earnings guidance provided by the Company to analysts and rating agencies. This review may be done generally through a discussion of the types of information to be disclosed and type of presentations to be made, and the Audit Committee need not discuss in advance each earnings release or each instance in which the Company may provide earnings guidance.

Review analyses setting forth-significant financial reporting issues and judgments made in connection with the preparation of the Company’s financial statements, including analyses of the effects of alternative GAAP methods on the financial statements.

Review major issues regarding the Company’s significant accounting principles and financial statement presentations and any changes in the selection or application of accounting principles;

major issues regarding the adequacy of the Company’s internal controls; and any special audit steps adopted in light of material control deficiencies. Consider the impact of acceptable alternative accounting principles that are communicated by the independent auditor, internal auditors or the Company’s management.

Review the effect of regulatory and accounting initiatives, as well as off-balance sheet structures, on the financial statements of the Company.

Discuss the Company’s policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management; including the Company’s major financial accounting and risk exposures and the steps management has undertaken to control them.

Make a recommendation to the Board as to the inclusion of the Company’s audited financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Submit the Audit Committee report required by the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission to be included in the Company’s annual proxy statement.

C.Audit Process of the Independent Auditor

Meet with the independent auditor prior to its commencing the audit to review the scope (i.e. nature of work performed by entity), planning and staffing of the audit.

Discuss with the independent auditor the matters required to be discussed under SAS 61, as amended by SAS 84 and SAS 90. Review with the independent auditor any problems or difficulties and management’s response; and hold timely discussions with the independent auditors regarding the following:

ºAll critical accounting policies and practices;

ºAll alternative treatments of financial information within generally accepted accounting principles that have been discussed with management, ramifications of the use of such alternative disclosures and treatments, and the treatment preferred by the independent auditor; and

ºOther material written communications between the independent auditor and management including, but not limited to, the management letter and schedule of unadjusted differences.

D.Internal Audit Function

Review and advise on the appointment and replacement of the Chief Audit Executive, the adequacy and qualifications of the Internal Audit staff, and the responsibilities, organization structure and budget of the Internal Audit function.

Review, periodically with the independent auditor, the budget, staffing, and responsibilities of the Internal Audit function.

Annually, review and recommend changes (if any) to the Internal Audit charter.

Review any significant reports or summaries thereof to the Company’s management prepared by the Internal Audit staff and related responses of the Company’s management.

Periodically review with the Chief Audit Executive any significant difficulties, disagreements with management, or scope restrictions encountered in the course of the Internal Audit function’s work.

E.Legal and Ethical Conduct Matters

Review with the Company’s General Counsel and management, legal matters that may have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements, the Company’s compliance policies, and any material reports or inquiries received from regulators or governmental agencies.

Recommend, review and update periodically a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and determine that management has established a system to enforce this Code. Determine whether the Code is in compliance with all applicable rules and regulations.

Review management’s monitoring of the Company’s compliance with the organization’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, and determine that management has the proper review system in place to ensure that the Company’s financial statements, reports, and other financial information disseminated to governmental organizations and the public, satisfy legal requirements.

Establish and maintain procedures for the receipt, retention, and treatment of complaints received by the Company regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, or auditing matters.

Establish and maintain procedures for the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of the Company of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters.

F.Evaluation

On an annual basis, the Audit Committee shall evaluate and discuss its performance relative to the Audit Committee’s purpose, duties and responsibilities, as described by this Charter.

The Audit Committee shall review and assess the adequacy of this Charter at least annually and recommend any proposed changes to the Board for approval.

IV.Meetings of the Audit Committee

The Audit Committee shall meet at least six times per year, or more frequently as circumstances require.

The Audit Committee shall report regularly to the Board regarding the execution of its duties and responsibilities, at a minimum, after each scheduled meeting of the Audit Committee, and shall keep written minutes of its meetings, which minutes shall be maintained with the books and records of“Board” means the Board of Directors of the Company.

The members(d) A “Change in Control” shall be deemed to have occurred if the event set forth in any one of the Audit Committeefollowing paragraphs shall select a chair who will preside at each meetinghave occurred:

(1) any Person is or becomes the “Beneficial Owner” (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Audit Committee and,Company (not including in consultation with the other memberssecurities Beneficially Owned by such Person any securities acquired directly from the Company) representing 50% or more of the Audit Committee, shall setCompany’s then outstanding securities, excluding any Person who becomes such a Beneficial Owner in connection with a transaction described in clause (i) of paragraph (3) below; or

(2) the frequency and length of each meeting and the agenda of itemsfollowing individuals cease for any reason to be addressed at each upcoming meeting. Aconstitute a majority of the membersnumber of directors then serving: individuals who, on the Effective Date, constitute the Board of Directors and any new director (other than a director whose initial assumption of office is in connection with an actual or threatened election contest, including but not limited to a consent solicitation, relating to the election of directors of the AuditCompany) whose appointment or election by the Board of Directors or nomination for election by the Company’s stockholders was approved or recommended by a vote of at least a majority of the directors then still in office who either were directors on the Effective Date or whose appointment, election or nomination for election was previously so approved or recommended; or

(3) there is consummated a merger or consolidation of the Company with any other corporation other than (i) a merger or consolidation which would result in the voting securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior to such merger or consolidation continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by

being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity or any parent thereof) at least 50% of the combined voting power of the voting securities of the Company or such surviving entity or any parent thereof outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation, or (ii) a merger or consolidation effected to implement a recapitalization of the Company (or similar transaction) in which no Person is or becomes the Beneficial Owner, directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company (not including in the securities Beneficially Owned by such Person any securities acquired directly from the Company) representing 50% or more of the combined voting power of the Company’s then outstanding securities; or

(4) the stockholders of the Company approve a plan of complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company or there is consummated an agreement for the sale or disposition by the Company of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets, other than a sale or disposition by the Company of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets to an entity, at least 75% of the combined voting power of the voting securities of which are owned by Persons in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of the Company immediately prior to such sale.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, a “Change in Control” shall not be deemed to have occurred by virtue of the consummation of any transaction or series of integrated transactions immediately following which the holders of the common stock of the Company immediately prior to such transaction or series of transactions continue to have substantially the same proportionate ownership in an entity which owns all or substantially all of the assets of the Company immediately following such transaction or series of transactions.

(e) “Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time.

(f) “Committee” shall mean the Board, or a committee designated by the Board to administer the Plan. With respect to Awards granted to Covered Employees, such committee shall consist of two or more persons, each of whom, unless otherwise determined by the Board, is an “outside director” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code and a “nonemployee director” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3.

(g) “Company” means Avis Budget Group, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware, or any successor corporation.

(h) “Covered Employee” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 162(m)(3) of the Code.

(i) “Effective Date” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 8(d) of the Plan.

(j) “Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended from time to time, and as now or hereafter construed, interpreted and applied by regulations, rulings and cases.

(k) “Fair Market Value” means, with respect to Stock or other property, the fair market value of such Stock or other property determined by such methods or procedures as shall be established from time to time by the Committee. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee in good faith, the per share Fair Market Value of Stock as of a particular date shall mean (i) the closing price per share of Stock on the national securities exchange on which the Stock is principally traded, for the last preceding date on which there was a sale of such Stock on such exchange, or (ii) if the shares of Stock are then traded in an over-the-counter market, the average of the closing bid and asked prices for the shares of Stock in such over-the-counter market for the last preceding date on which there was a sale of such Stock in such market, or (iii) if the shares of Stock are not then listed on a national securities exchange or traded in an over-the-counter market, such value as the Committee, in its sole discretion, shall determine.

(l) “Grantee” means an employee, consultants, or independent contractor (including non-employee director) of the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company or such other individual that performs services for or provides services to the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company that has been granted an Award under the Plan.

(m) “ISO” means any Option intended to be and designated as an incentive stock option within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code.

(n) “NQSO” means any Option that is not designated as an ISO.

(o) “Option” means a right, granted to a Grantee under Section 6(b)(i), to purchase shares of Stock. An Option may be either an ISO or an NQSO.

(p) “Other Cash-Based Award” means cash awarded under Section 6(b)(v) of the Plan, including cash awarded as a bonus or upon the attainment of Performance Goals or otherwise as permitted under the Plan.

(q) “Other Stock-Based Award” means a right or other interest granted to a Grantee under Section 6(b)(v) of the Plan that may be denominated or payable in, valued in whole or in part by reference to, or otherwise based on, or related to, Stock, including but not limited to (i) unrestricted Stock awarded as a bonus or upon the attainment of Performance Goals or otherwise as permitted under the Plan, and (ii) a right granted to a Grantee to acquire Stock from the Company containing terms and conditions prescribed by the Committee.

(r) “Performance Goals” means performance goals based on the attainment by the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company (or any division or business unit of such entity) of performance goals pre-established by the Committee in its sole discretion, based on one or more of the following criteria (as determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles): (1) return on total stockholder equity; (2) earnings per share of Company Stock; (3) net income (before or after taxes); (4) earnings before any or all of interest, taxes, minority interest, depreciation and amortization; (5) sales or revenues; (6) return on assets, capital or investment; (7) market share; (8) cost reduction goals; (9) implementation or completion of critical projects or processes; (10) cash flow; (11) gross or net profit margin; and (12) any combination of, or a specified increase in, any of the foregoing. The performance goals may be based upon the attainment of specified levels of performance under one or more of the measures described above relative to the performance of other entities. To the extent permitted under Section 162(m) of the Code (including, without limitation, compliance with any requirements for stockholder approval) or to the extent that an Award is not intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code, the Committee in its sole discretion may designate additional business criteria on which the performance goals may be based or adjust, modify or amend the aforementioned business criteria. Performance Goals may include a threshold level of performance below which no Award will be earned, a level of performance at which the target amount of an Award will be earned and a level of performance at which the maximum amount of the Award will be earned. The Committee in its sole discretion shall have the authority to make equitable adjustments to the Performance Goals in recognition of unusual or non-recurring events affecting the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company or the financial statements of the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company, in response to changes in applicable laws or regulations, including changes in generally accepted accounting principles or practices, or to account for items of gain, loss or expense determined to be extraordinary or unusual in nature or infrequent in occurrence or related to the disposal of a segment of a business or related to a change in accounting principles, as applicable.

(s) “Person” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3(a)(9) of the Exchange Act, as modified and used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) thereof, except that such term shall not include (1) the Company or any Subsidiary Corporation, (2) a trustee or other fiduciary holding securities under an employee benefit plan of the Company or any Subsidiary Corporation, (3) an underwriter temporarily holding securities pursuant to an offering of such securities, or (4) a corporation owned, directly or indirectly, by the stockholders of the Company in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of stock of the Company.

(t) “Plan” means this Avis Budget Group, Inc. 2007 Equity and Incentive Plan, as amended from time to time.

(u) “Restricted Stock” means an Award of shares of Stock to a Grantee under Section 6(b)(iii) that may be subject to certain restrictions and to a risk of forfeiture.

(v) “Restricted Stock Unit” means a right granted to a Grantee under Section 6(b)(iv) to receive Stock or cash at the end of a specified deferral period, which right may be conditioned on the satisfaction of specified performance or other criteria.

(w) “Rule 16b-3” means Rule 16b-3, as from time to time in effect promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission under Section 16 of the Exchange Act, including any successor to such Rule.

(x) “Stock” means shares of the common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Company.

(y) “Stock Appreciation Right” or “SAR” means the right, granted to a Grantee under Section 6(b)(ii), to be paid an amount measured by the appreciation in the Fair Market Value of Stock from the date of grant to the date of exercise of the right.

(z) “Subsidiary” means a “subsidiary corporation,” whether now or hereafter existing, as defined in Section 424(f) of the Code.

(aa) “Substitute Awards” means Awards granted or shares of Stock issued by the Company in assumption of, or in substitution or exchange for, awards previously granted by a company acquired by the Company or any Subsidiary or with which the Company or any Subsidiary combines.

(bb) “Total Authorized Shares” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 5 of the Plan.

3.Administration.

The Plan shall be administered by the Committee. The Committee shall have the authority in its sole discretion, subject to and not inconsistent with the express provisions of the Plan, to administer the Plan and to exercise all the powers and authorities either specifically granted to it under the Plan or necessary or advisable in the administration of the Plan, including, without limitation, the authority to grant Awards; to determine the persons to whom and the time or times at which Awards shall be granted; to determine the type and number of Awards to be granted, the number of shares of Stock to which an Award may relate and the terms, conditions, restrictions and performance criteria relating to any Award; to determine Performance Goals no later than such time as required to ensure that an underlying Award which is intended to comply with the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Code so complies; and to determine whether, to what extent, and under what circumstances an Award may be settled, cancelled, forfeited, exchanged, or surrendered; to make adjustments in the terms and conditions of, and the Performance Goals (if any) included in, Awards; to construe and interpret the Plan and any Award; to prescribe, amend and rescind rules and regulations relating to the Plan; to determine the terms and provisions of the Award Agreements (which need not be identical for each Grantee); and to make all other determinations deemed necessary or advisable for the administration of the Plan. Notwithstanding the foregoing, neither the Board, the Committee nor their respective delegates shall have the authority to reprice (or cancel and regrant) any Option or, if applicable, other Award at a lower exercise, base or purchase price without first obtaining the approval of the Company’s stockholders.

All determinations of the Committee shall be made by a majority of its members either present in person or participating by means of a conference telephone at a meeting or other communications equipment, by meanswritten consent. The Committee may delegate to one or more of whichits members or to one or more agents such administrative duties as it may deem advisable, and the Committee or any person to whom it has delegated duties as aforesaid may employ one or more persons to render advice with respect to any responsibility the Committee or such person may have under the Plan. All decisions, determinations and interpretations of the Committee shall be final and binding on all persons, participating inincluding but not limited to the meeting can hear each other, shall constitute a quorum.Company, any Subsidiary of the Company, or Grantee (or any person claiming any rights under the Plan from or through any Grantee) and any stockholder.

Periodically,No member of the AuditBoard or Committee shall meetbe liable for any action taken or determination made in good faith with respect to the Company’s management, membersPlan or any Award granted hereunder.

4.Eligibility.

Awards may be granted to executive officers and other key employees, consultants and independent contractors (including non-employee directors) of the Company’s Internal Audit staffCompany or its Subsidiaries, including officers and directors who are employees, to key consultants to the Company or its Subsidiaries, and to other individuals who perform services for or provide services to the Company or its Subsidiaries. In determining the persons to whom Awards shall be granted and the number of shares to be covered by each Award, the Committee shall take into account the duties of the respective persons, their present and potential contributions to the success of the Company or its Subsidiaries and such other factors as the Committee shall deem relevant in connection with accomplishing the independent auditor in separate sessions.purposes of the Plan.

 

V.5.Resources ofStock Subject to the Audit CommitteePlan.

The Auditmaximum number of shares of Stock reserved for the grant of Awards under the Plan shall be 8,000,000 shares of Stock (all of which such shares of Stock may be granted as ISOs), subject to adjustment as provided herein (“Total Authorized Shares”). Subject to adjustment as provided herein, no more than (1) 4,000,000 shares of Stock may be awarded under the Plan in the aggregate in respect of Awards other than Options and SARs, and (2) 1,000,000 shares of Stock may be made subject to Awards granted to an individual in a single calendar year. Determinations made in respect of the limitations set forth in the immediately preceding sentence shall be made in a manner consistent with Section 162(m) of the Code. Such shares of Stock may, in whole or in part, be authorized but unissued shares or shares of Stock that shall have been or may be reacquired by the Company in the open market, in private transactions or otherwise. If any shares of Stock subject to an Award are forfeited, or cancelled or if an Award terminates or expires without a distribution of shares to the Grantee, the shares of Stock with respect to such Award shall, to the extent of any such forfeiture, cancellation, termination or expiration, again be available for Awards under the Plan. Upon the exercise of any Award granted in tandem with any Awards such related Awards shall be cancelled to the extent of the number of shares of Stock as to which the Award is exercised and, notwithstanding the foregoing, such number of shares shall no longer be available for Awards under the Plan. In addition, shares of Stock surrendered or withheld as payment of either the exercise price of an Award (including shares of Stock otherwise underlying an Award of a SAR that are retained by the Company to account for the grant price of such SAR) and/or withholding taxes in respect of an Award shall no longer be available for Awards under the Plan.

In the event that the Committee shall determine that any dividend or other distribution (whether in the form of cash, Stock, or other property), recapitalization, Stock split, reverse split, reorganization, merger, consolidation, spin-off, combination, repurchase, or share exchange, or other similar corporate transaction or event, affects the Stock such that an adjustment is appropriate in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of the rights of Grantees under the Plan, then the Committee shall make such equitable changes or adjustments as it deems necessary or appropriate to any or all of (i) the number and kind of shares of Stock or other property (including cash) that may thereafter be issued in connection with Awards, (ii) the number and kind of shares of Stock or other property (including cash) issued or issuable in respect of outstanding Awards, (iii) the exercise price, grant price, or purchase price relating to any Award; provided, that, with respect to ISOs, such adjustment shall be made in accordance with Section 424(h) of the Code; and (iv) the Performance Goals applicable to outstanding Awards.

6.Specific Terms of Awards.

(a)General. The term of each Award shall be for such period as may be determined by the Committee. Subject to the terms of the Plan and any applicable Award Agreement, payments to be made by the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company upon the grant, maturation, or exercise of an Award may be made in such forms as the Committee shall determine at the date of grant or thereafter, including, without limitation, cash, Stock, or other property, and may be made in a single payment or transfer, in installments, or on a deferred basis. The Committee may make rules relating to installment or deferred payments with respect to Awards, including the

rate of interest to be credited with respect to such payments. In addition to the foregoing, the Committee may impose on any Award or the exercise thereof, at the date of grant or thereafter, such additional terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the provisions of the Plan, as the Committee shall determine.

(b)Types of Awards. The Committee is authorized to grant the Awards described in this Section 6(b), under such terms and conditions as deemed by the Committee to be consistent with the purposes of the Plan. Such Awards may be granted with value and payment contingent upon Performance Goals. Each Award shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement containing such terms and conditions applicable to such Award as the Committee shall determine at the date of grant or thereafter.

(i)Options. The Committee is authorized to grant Options to Grantees on the following terms and conditions:

(A)Type of Award. The Award Agreement evidencing the grant of an Option under the Plan shall designate the Option as an ISO or an NQSO.

(B)Exercise Price. The exercise price per share of Stock purchasable under an Option shall be determined by the Committee, but in no event shall the exercise price of any Option be less than the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock on the date of grant of such Option. The exercise price for Stock subject to an Option may be paid in cash or by an exchange of Stock previously owned by the Grantee, through a “broker cashless exercise” procedure approved by the Committee, a combination of the above, or any other method approved the Committee, in any case in an amount having a combined value equal to such exercise price.

(C)Term and Exercisability of Options. The date on which the Committee adopts a resolution expressly granting an Option shall be considered the day on which such Option is granted unless the Committee determines that a future date is advisable. Options shall be exercisable over the exercise period (which shall not exceed ten years from the date of grant), at such times and upon such conditions as the Committee may determine, as reflected in the Award Agreement; provided, that (i) subject to clause (ii) below, no Option granted to an employee of the Company or a Subsidiary (other than Substitute Awards) shall vest prior to the first anniversary of the date on which the Option is granted and (ii) the Committee shall have the authority to retainaccelerate the exercisability of any outstanding Option at such time and compensate legal, accounting, or other advisors to advise the Audit Committee and assistunder such circumstances as it, in fulfilling its duties and responsibilities. The Auditsole discretion, deems appropriate. An Option may be exercised to the extent of any or all full shares of Stock as to which the Option has become exercisable, by giving written notice of such exercise to the Committee or its designated agent.

(D)Other Provisions. Options may be subject to such other conditions including, but not limited to, restrictions on transferability of the shares of Stock acquired upon exercise of such Options, as the Committee may request any officerprescribe in its discretion or as may be required by applicable law.

(ii)SARs. The Committee is authorized to grant SARs to Grantees on the following terms and conditions:

(A)In General. SARs may be granted independently or in tandem with an Option at the time of grant of the related Option. An SAR granted in tandem with an Option shall be exercisable only to the extent the underlying Option is exercisable. Unless otherwise specified in the Award Agreement, payment of an SAR shall be made in Stock.

(B)Term and Exercisability of SARs. The date on which the Committee adopts a resolution expressly granting an SAR shall be considered the day on which such SAR is granted unless the Committee determines that a future date is advisable. SARs shall be exercisable over the exercise period (which shall not exceed ten years from the date of grant), at such times and upon such conditions as the Committee may determine, as reflected in the Award Agreement; provided, (i) subject to clause (ii) below, no SAR granted to an employee of the Company or a Subsidiary (other than Substitute Awards) shall vest prior

to the Company’s outside counsel or independent auditor, to attend a meetingfirst anniversary of the Audit Committee or to meet with any members of, or advisors to,date on which the Audit Committee.

VI.Other

While the Audit Committee has the responsibilitiesSAR is granted and powers set forth in this Charter, it is not the duty of the Audit Committee to plan or conduct audits, or to determine(ii) that the Company’s financial statements are materially accurate and in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. This is the responsibility of the Company’s management and the independent auditor.

ANNEX C

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO

THE AMENDED AND RESTATED

CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

OF

CENDANT CORPORATION

Reverse Stock Split Proposal

The reverse stock split proposal provides that the amended and restated certificate of incorporation of Cendant Corporation will be amended by adding the following new Paragraph C at the end of Article 4:

“C. REVERSE STOCK SPLIT

(1) Upon this amendment becoming effective (the “Effective Time”), a one-for-ten reverse stock split of each of the par value $0.01 Common Stock (“Old Common Stock”) shall become effective, such that (a) every ten (10) shares of $0.01 par value Old Common Stock of the Corporation either issued and outstanding or held by the Corporation as treasury stock immediately prior to the Effective Time, will be automatically reclassified, combined and converted into one (1) share of $0.01 par value Common Stock of the Corporation.

(2) Notwithstanding the immediately preceding sentence, no fractional shares of Common Stock shall be issued to holders of record of Old Common Stock in connection with the foregoing reclassification of shares of Old Common Stock. In lieu thereof, the Corporation shall pay cash equal to such fraction multiplied by the then fair value per share of Common Stock, as applicable, as determined by the Board of Directors of the Corporation.

(3) Each stock certificate that, immediately prior to the Effective Time, represented shares of Old Common Stock, as applicable, shall, from and after the Effective Time, automatically and without the necessity of presenting the same for exchange, represent that number of whole shares of Common Stock into which the shares of Old Common Stock, as applicable, represented by such certificate shall have been reclassified (as well as the right to receive cash in lieu of any fractional shares of Common Stock, as set forth above).”

Name Change Proposal

The name change proposal provides that the amended and restated certificate of incorporation of Cendant Corporation will be amended by (I) deleting clause (1) and replacing that clause with the following text:

“(1) The name of the Corporation is Avis Budget Group, Inc.”; and

(II) by deleting Article 1. and replacing that Article with the following text:

“1. The name of the Corporation is Avis Budget Group, Inc. (hereinafter, the “Corporation”).”

Redesignation of Common Stock Proposal

The redesignation of common stock proposal provides that the amended and restated certificate of incorporation of Cendant Corporation will be amended by (I) if the reverse stock split proposal is completed, deleting Section (A) of Article 4 and replacing that Section with the following text:

“A. Common Stock

The CorporationCommittee shall have the authority to issue sharesaccelerate the exercisability of Commonany outstanding SAR at such time and under such circumstances as it, in its sole discretion, deems appropriate.

(C)Payment. An SAR shall confer on the Grantee a right to receive an amount with respect to each share of Stock subject thereto, upon exercise thereof, equal to the excess of (1) the Fair Market Value of one share of Stock on the date of exercise over (2) the grant price of the SAR (which in one series. Such seriesthe case of Commonan SAR granted in tandem with an Option shall be equal to the exercise price of the underlying Option, and which in the case of any other SAR shall be such price as the Committee may determine but in no event shall be less than the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock on the date of grant of such SAR). A SAR may be exercised by giving written notice of such exercise to the Committee or its designated agent.

(iii)Restricted Stock. The Committee is authorized to grant Restricted Stock to Grantees on the following terms and conditions:

(A)Issuance and Restrictions. Restricted Stock shall be designatedsubject to such restrictions on transferability and other restrictions, if any, as Common Stock. When the filingCommittee may impose at the date of this Amendedgrant or thereafter, which restrictions may lapse separately or in combination at such times, under such circumstances, in such installments, or otherwise, as the Committee may determine. The Committee may place restrictions on Restricted Stock that shall lapse, in whole or in part, only upon the attainment of Performance Goals. Notwithstanding the above, (i) subject to clause (ii) below, no award of Restricted Stock granted to an employee of the Company or a Subsidiary (other than Substitute Awards) shall vest prior to the first anniversary of the date on which such award is granted, and Restated Certificate of Incorporation becomes effective, each share of Common Stock (previously classified as Cendant Corporation-CD Common Stock) (and outstanding certificates that had theretofore represented shares of Cendant Corporation-CD Common Stock) outstanding immediately prior thereto shall automatically be reclassified as one share of Common Stock (and outstanding certificates that had theretofore represented shares of Cendant Corporation-CD Common Stock shall thereupon represent an equal number of shares of Common Stock despite(ii) the absence of any indication thereon to that effect).

The total number of shares of Common Stock which the CorporationCommittee shall have the authority to issueaccelerate the exercisability of any outstanding award of Restricted Stock at such time and under such circumstances as it, in its sole discretion, deems appropriate. Except to the extent restricted under the Award Agreement relating to the Restricted Stock, a Grantee granted Restricted Stock shall initiallyhave all of the rights of a stockholder including, without limitation, the right to vote Restricted Stock and the right to receive dividends thereon.

(B)Certificates for Stock. Restricted Stock granted under the Plan may be 250,000,000.evidenced in such manner as the Committee shall determine. If certificates representing Restricted Stock are registered in the name of the Grantee, such certificates shall bear an appropriate legend referring to the terms, conditions, and restrictions applicable to such Restricted Stock, and the Company shall retain physical possession of the certificate.

(C)Dividends. Except to the extent restricted under the applicable Award Agreement, dividends paid on Restricted Stock shall be either paid at the dividend payment date in cash or in shares of unrestricted Stock having a Fair Market Value equal to the amount of such dividends. Stock distributed in connection with a stock split or stock dividend, and other property distributed as a dividend, shall be subject to restrictions and a risk of forfeiture to the same extent as the Restricted Stock with respect to which such Stock or other property has been distributed.

(iv)Restricted Stock Units. The BoardCommittee is authorized to grant Restricted Stock Units to Grantees, subject to the following terms and conditions:

(A)Conditions to Vesting. At the time of Directorsthe grant of Restricted Stock Units, the Committee may impose such restrictions or conditions to the vesting of such Awards as it, in its discretion, deems appropriate, including, but not limited to, achievement of Performance Goals. Notwithstanding the above, (i) subject to clause (ii) below, no award of Restricted Stock Units granted to an employee of the Company or a Subsidiary (other than Substitute Awards) shall vest prior to the first anniversary of the date on which such award is granted, and (ii) the Committee shall have the authority to increaseaccelerate the exercisability of any outstanding award of Restricted Stock Units at such time and under such circumstances as it, in its sole discretion, deems appropriate.

(B)Benefit Upon Vesting. Unless otherwise provided in an Award Agreement, upon the vesting of a Restricted Stock Unit, there shall be delivered to the Grantee, within 30 days of the date on which such Award (or any portion thereof) vests, the number of shares of Stock equal to the number of shares of Stock equal to the number of Restricted Stock Units becoming so vested.

(C)Dividend Equivalents. Subject to the requirements of Section 409A of the Code, an Award of Restricted Stock Units may provide the Grantee with the right to receive dividend equivalent payments with respect to Stock subject to the Award (both before and after the Stock subject to the Award is earned, vested, or decreaseacquired), which payments may be either made currently or credited to an account for the Participant, and may be settled in cash or Stock, as determined by the Committee. Any such settlements and any such crediting of dividend equivalents may be subject to such conditions, restrictions and contingencies as the Committee shall establish, including the reinvestment of such credited amounts in Stock equivalents.

(v)Other Stock- or Cash-Based Awards. The Committee is authorized to grant Awards to Grantees in the form of Other Stock-Based Awards or Other Cash-Based Awards, as deemed by the Committee to be consistent with the purposes of the Plan. Awards granted pursuant to this paragraph may be granted with value and payment contingent upon the achievement of Performance Goals, and, if so granted, such goals shall relate to periods of performance in excess of one calendar year. The Committee shall determine the terms and conditions of such Awards at the date of grant or thereafter. The maximum amount that any Grantee may receive with respect to Other Cash-Based Awards pursuant to this Section 6(b)(v) in respect of any annual performance period is three times such Grantee’s annual base salary as of the beginning of the performance period and for any other performance period in excess of one year, such amount multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of months in the performance period and the denominator of which is twelve. Payments earned hereunder may be decreased or, with respect to any Grantee who is not a Covered Employee, increased in the sole discretion of the Committee based on such factors as it deems appropriate. No payment shall be made to a Covered Employee prior to the certification by the Committee that the Performance Goals have been attained. The Committee may establish such other rules applicable to the Other Stock- or Cash-Based Awards to the extent not inconsistent with Section 162(m) of the Code.

(c)Termination of Service. Except as otherwise set forth by in the Award Agreement, each Award shall terminate immediately upon the Grantee’s termination of service with the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, except that the Grantee shall have 90 days following the date of such termination of service to exercise any portion of an Option or SAR that he could have exercised on the date of such termination of service; provided, however, that such exercise must be accomplished prior to the expiration of the Award term. Notwithstanding the foregoing, except as otherwise set forth by the Committee in the Award Agreement, if the Grantee ‘s termination of service is due to his total and permanent disability (as defined in any agreement between the Grantee and the Company or, if no such agreement is in effect, as determined by the Committee in its good faith discretion) or death, the Grantee, or the representative of the estate of the Grantee, as the case may be, may exercise any portion of the Option or SAR which the Participant could have exercised on the date of such termination for a period of six months thereafter; provided, however, that such exercise must be accomplished prior to the expiration of the Award term. Notwithstanding the foregoing, except as set forth by the Committee in the Award Agreement, in the event of a termination of the Grantee ‘s service with the Company or any of its Subsidiaries for Cause, the unexercised portion of the Option or SAR shall terminate immediately and the Grantee shall have no right thereafter to exercise any part of the Award.

7.Change in Control Provisions.

(a) Unless otherwise determined by the Committee and evidenced in an Award Agreement, in the event of a Change in Control:

(i) any Award carrying a right to exercise that was not previously vested and exercisable shall become fully vested and exercisable; and

(ii) the restrictions, payment conditions, and forfeiture conditions applicable to any other Award granted under the Plan shall lapse and such Awards shall be deemed fully vested, and any performance conditions imposed with respect to Awards shall be deemed to be fully achieved.

(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, in the event of a Change in Control in which the consideration paid to the holders of shares of Stock is solely cash, the Committee may, in its discretion, provide that each Award shall, upon the occurrence of a Change in Control, be cancelled in exchange for a payment in an amount equal to (i) the excess of the consideration paid per share of Stock in the Change in Control over the exercise or purchase price (if any) per share of Stock subject to the Award multiplied by (ii) the number of Shares granted under the Award.

8.General Provisions.

(a)Nontransferability. Awards shall not be transferable by a Grantee except by will or the laws of descent and distribution and shall be exercisable during the lifetime of a Grantee only by such Grantee or his guardian or legal representative.

(b)No Right to Continued Employment, etc. Nothing in the Plan or in any Award, any Award Agreement or other agreement entered into pursuant hereto shall confer upon any Grantee the right to continue in the employ or service of the Company or Subsidiary of the Company or to be entitled to any remuneration or benefits not set forth in the Plan or such Award Agreement or other agreement or to interfere with or limit in any way the right of the Company or any such Subsidiary to terminate such Grantee’s employment or independent contractor relationship.

(c)Taxes. The Company or any Subsidiary of the Company is authorized to withhold from any Award granted, any payment relating to an Award under the Plan, including from a distribution of Stock, or any other payment to a Grantee, amounts of withholding and other taxes due in connection with any transaction involving an Award, and to take such other action as the Committee may deem advisable to enable the Company and Grantees to satisfy obligations for the payment of withholding taxes and other tax obligations relating to any Award. This authority shall include authority to withhold or receive Stock or other property and to make cash payments in respect thereof in satisfaction of a Grantee’s tax obligations. The Committee may provide in the Award Agreement that in the event that a Grantee is required to pay any amount to be withheld in connection with the issuance of shares of Stock in settlement or exercise of an Award, such withholding and other taxes shall be satisfied with shares of Stock to be received upon settlement or exercise of such Award equal to the minimum amount required to be withheld.

(d)Stockholder Approval; Amendment and Termination.

(i) The Plan shall take effect upon its adoption by the Board (the “Effective Date”).

(ii) The Board may at any time and from time to time alter, amend, suspend, or terminate the total numberPlan in whole or in part; provided, however, that unless otherwise determined by the Board, an amendment that requires stockholder approval in order for the Plan to continue to comply with Section 162(m) or any other law, regulation or stock exchange requirement shall not be effective unless approved by the requisite vote of sharesstockholders. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no amendment to or termination of Common Stock which the CorporationPlan shall affect adversely any of the rights of any Grantee, without such Grantee’s consent, under any Award theretofore granted under the Plan.

(e)Expiration of Plan. Unless earlier terminated by the Board pursuant to the provisions of the Plan, the Plan shall expire on the tenth anniversary of the date of the Plan’s adoption by the Board. No Awards shall be granted under the Plan after such expiration date. The expiration of the Plan shall not affect adversely any of the rights of any Grantee, without such Grantee’s consent, under any Award theretofore granted.

(f)Deferrals. The Committee shall have the authority to issue, but not aboveestablish such procedures and programs that it deems appropriate to provide Grantees with the number which would exceedability to defer receipt of cash, Stock or other property payable

with respect to Awards granted under the total numberPlan; provided, however, to the extent that such deferral is subject to Section 409A of the Code, the rules and procedures established by the Committee shall comply with Section 409A of the Code.

(g)No Rights to Awards; No Stockholder Rights. No Grantee shall have any claim to be granted any Award under the Plan, and there is no obligation for uniformity of treatment of Grantees. Except as provided specifically herein, a Grantee or a transferee of an Award shall have no rights as a stockholder with respect to any shares of Stock covered by the Award until the date of the issuance of a Stock certificate to him for such shares or the issuance of shares of Common Stock that the Corporation has the authority to issue, and not below the number of shares of Common Stock then outstanding.

The powers, preferences and rights, and the qualifications, limitations and restrictions of the Common Stock are as follows:

(1)Voting. Each stockholder represented at a meeting of the stockholders shall be entitled to cast one (1) votehim in person or by proxy for each share of the Common Stock entitled to vote thereat held by such stockholder.book-entry form.

(2)(h)No Cumulative VotingUnfunded Status of Awards. The holdersPlan is intended to constitute an “unfunded” plan for incentive and deferred compensation. With respect to any payments not yet made to a Grantee pursuant to an Award, nothing contained in the Plan or any Award shall give any such Grantee any rights that are greater than those of sharesa general creditor of Common Stock shall not have cumulative voting rights.the Company.

(3)(i)Dividends; Stock SplitsNo Fractional Shares. Subject to the rights of the holders of Preferred Stock, and subject to any other provisions of this Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as it may be amended from time to time, holders ofNo fractional shares of the Common Stock shall be entitledrequired to receivebe issued or delivered pursuant to the Plan or any Award. The Committee shall determine whether cash, other Awards, or other property shall be issued or paid in lieu of such dividendsfractional shares of Stock or whether such fractional shares or any rights thereto shall be forfeited or otherwise eliminated.

(j)Regulations and other distributions in cash, stock or propertyOther Approvals.

(i) The obligation of the Corporation when,Company to sell or deliver Stock with respect to any Award granted under the Plan shall be subject to all applicable laws, rules and regulations, including all applicable federal and state securities laws, and the obtaining of all such approvals by governmental agencies as and if declared thereonmay be deemed necessary or appropriate by the BoardCommittee.

(ii) Each Award is subject to the requirement that, if at any time the Committee determines, in its absolute discretion, that the listing, registration or qualification of Directors from timeStock issuable pursuant to time outthe Plan is required by any securities exchange or under any state or federal law, or the consent or approval of assetsany governmental regulatory body is necessary or fundsdesirable as a condition of, or in connection with, the Corporation legally available therefor.”grant of an Award or the issuance of Stock, no such Award shall be granted or payment made or Stock issued, in whole or in part, unless listing, registration, qualification, consent or approval has been effected or obtained free of any conditions not acceptable to the Committee.

or (II) if(iii) In the reverse stock splitevent that the disposition of Stock acquired pursuant to the Plan is not completed, deleting Section (A) of Article 4covered by a then current registration statement under the Securities Act and replacing that Section with the following text:

“A. Common Stock

The Corporation shall have the authority to issue shares of Common Stock in one series. Such series of Commonis not otherwise exempt from such registration, such Stock shall be designatedrestricted against transfer to the extent required by the Securities Act or regulations thereunder, and the Committee may require a Grantee receiving Stock pursuant to the Plan, as Common Stock. Whena condition precedent to receipt of such Stock, to represent to the filing of this Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation becomes effective, each share of Common Stock (previously classified as Cendant Corporation-CD Common Stock) (and outstanding certificates that had theretofore represented shares of Cendant Corporation-CD Common Stock) outstanding immediately prior thereto shall automatically be reclassified as one share of Common Stock (and outstanding certificates that had theretofore represented shares of Cendant Corporation-CD Common Stock shall thereupon represent an equal number of shares of Common Stock despite the absence of any indication thereon to that effect).

The total number of shares of Common Stock which the Corporation shall have the authority to issue shall initially be 2,500,000,000. The Board of Directors shall have the authority to increase or decrease from time to time the total number of shares of Common Stock which the Corporation shall have the authority to issue, but not above the number which would exceed the total number of shares of Common StockCompany in writing that the Corporation has the authority to issue,Stock acquired by such Grantee is acquired for investment only and not belowwith a view to distribution.

(iv) The Committee may require a Grantee receiving Stock pursuant to the numberPlan, as a condition precedent to receipt of shares of Commonsuch Stock, then outstanding.

to enter into a stockholder agreement or “lock-up” agreement in such form as the Committee shall determine is necessary or desirable to further the Company’s interests.

(k)Governing Law. The powers, preferencesPlan and rights,all determinations made and actions taken pursuant hereto shall be governed by the qualifications, limitations and restrictionslaws of the Common Stock are as follows:

(1)Voting. Each stockholder represented at a meetingState of the stockholders shall be entitled to cast one (1) vote in person or by proxy for each share of the Common Stock entitled to vote thereat held by such stockholder.

(2)No Cumulative Voting. The holders of shares of Common Stock shall not have cumulative voting rights.

(3)Dividends; Stock Splits. SubjectDelaware without giving effect to the rightsconflict of the holders of Preferred Stock, and subject to any other provisions of this Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as it may be amended from time to time, holders of shares of the Common Stock shall be entitled to receive such dividends and other distributions in cash, stock or property of the Corporation when, as and if declared thereon by the Board of Directors from time to time out of assets or funds of the Corporation legally available therefor.”laws principles thereof.

Decrease of Authorized Shares Proposal

The decrease of authorized shares proposal provides that the amended and restated certificate of incorporation of Cendant Corporation will be amended by deleting the first paragraph of Article 4 and replacing that paragraph with the following text:

“4. Capital Stock

The total number of shares of all classes of stock which the Corporation shall have authority to issue is 260,000,000, consisting of (i) 250,000,000 shares of Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share (“Common Stock”), and (ii) 10,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value per share (“Preferred Stock”). No stockholder shall have any preemptive right to subscribe to or purchase any additional shares of stock of the Corporation or any securities convertible into any such shares or representing a right or option to purchase any such shares.”

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH NOMINEE AS A DIRECTOR. UNLESS MARKED TO THE CONTRARY, PROXIES RECEIVED BY THE COMPANY WILL BE VOTED “FOR” THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES LISTED BELOW.DIRECTORS.  

Please

Mark Here

for Address

Change or

Comments
SEE REVERSE SIDE

  ¨

  FOR all nominees listed
except as indicated
SEE REVERSE SIDE

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH NOMINEE AS A DIRECTOR. UNLESS MARKED TO THE CONTRARY, PROXIES RECEIVED BY THE COMPANY WILL BE VOTED “FOR” THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES LISTED BELOW.

1.WITHHOLD AUTHORITY to vote for all nomineesTHE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” PROPOSALS 2, 3, 4, 5 AND 6.FORAGAINSTABSTAIN

1. Election of Directors to serve as Directors for a one-year term ending at the 20072008 Annual Meeting

  Nominees:

  01 Ronald L. Nelson05 Martin L . Edelman

FOR all

nominees

listed except

as indicated

  

¨WITHHOLD

AUTHORITY

to vote for

all nominees

  02 Mary C. Choksi  ¨06 Sheli Z. Rosenberg
  03 Leonard S. Coleman  

07 F. Robert Salerno

¨¨

  04 Lynn Krominga

08 Stender E. Sweeney

To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee, strike a line through that nominee’s name.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” PROPOSALS 2 AND 3.

ForAgainstAbstain
2.To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the auditors of the Company’s financial statements for fiscal year 2006.

¨¨¨
(A) if the Separation Plan has not been completed prior to or as of the date of the Meeting,FORAGAINSTABSTAIN

  01 Henry R. Silverman

  02 Myra J. Biblowit

  03 James E. Buckman

  04 Leonard S. Coleman

  05 Martin L. Edelman

  06 George Herrera

07 Stephen P. Holmes
08 Louise T. Blouin MacBain
09 Cheryl D. Mills
10 Brian Mulroney
11 Robert E. Nederlander
12 Ronald L. Nelson

13 Robert W. Pittman

14 Pauline D.E. Richards

15 Sheli Z. Rosenberg

16 Robert F. Smith

3. To consider and approve the Company’s proposal to amend its amended and restated certificate of incorporation to effect a one-for-ten reverse stock split of its common stock.

2007.
  ¨  ¨  ¨
    For  Against  Abstain
3.  FORAGAINSTABSTAIN

4. To consider and approve the Company’s proposal to amend its amended and restated certificate of incorporation to change the name of the Company to “AvisAvis Budget Group, Inc.

¨¨¨
(B) if the Separation Plan has been completed prior to or as of the date of the Meeting,FORAGAINSTABSTAIN

  17 Ronald L. Nelson

  18 Leonard S. Coleman

  19 Martin L. Edelman

20 Sheli Z. Rosenberg
21 F. Robert Salerno
22 Stender E. Sweeney

5. To consider 2007 Equity and approve the Company’s proposal to amend its amended and restated certificate of incorporation to redesignate the Company’s series of common stock presently designated as “Cendant Corporation-CD Common Stock” to “Common Stock”, to remove references to the series of common stock defined as “Move.com Stock���.

¨¨¨
To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee, strike a line through that nominee's name.FORAGAINSTABSTAIN

6. To consider and approve the Company’s proposal to amend its amended and restated certificate of incorporation to decrease the number of authorized shares of the Company’s common stock to 250 million shares.

Incentive Plan.
  ¨  ¨  ¨
4.  THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “AGAINST” PROPOSALS 7 AND 8.
FORAGAINSTABSTAIN

7. To consider and vote upon stockholder proposal one.

¨¨¨
FORAGAINSTABSTAIN

8. To consider and vote upon stockholder proposal two.

¨¨¨

9. To transact such other business as may properly come before the Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.


    

 

Signature

  

Signature

 Signature Date

 Date 

Please sign exactly as name appears. If signing for trusts, estates or corporations, capacity or title should be stated. If shares are owned jointly, both owners must sign. THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.

 


D FOLD AND DETACH HERED

*INSTRUCTION: Enroll for electronic delivery today at www.melloninvestor.com/ISDÙ

for secure online access to your proxy materials, statements, tax documents andFOLD AND DETACH HERE

other important stockholder correspondence.Ù

Vote by Internet or Telephone or MailWE ENCOURAGE YOU TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF INTERNET OR TELEPHONE VOTING

BOTH ARE AVAILABLE 24 Hours a Day,HOURS A DAY, 7 Days a WeekDAYS A WEEK

Internet and telephone voting isare available through 11:59 PM Eastern Time

the day prior to annual meeting day.

Your Internet or telephone vote authorizes the named proxies to vote your shares in the same manner

as if you marked, signed and returned your proxy card.card by mail.

 

InternetINTERNET

http://www.proxyvoting.com/cdcar

Use the internet to vote your proxy.

Have your proxy card in hand

when you access the web site.

 OR 

TelephoneTELEPHONE

1-866-540-5760

Use any touch-tone telephone to

    vote your proxy. Have your proxy

    card in hand when you call.

OR

Mail

Mark, sign and date

your proxy card and

return it in the

enclosed postage-paid

envelope.

If you vote your proxy by Internet or by telephone,

you do NOT need to mail back your proxy card.

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT.To vote by mail, mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the enclosed postage-paid envelope.

ChooseMLinkSM for fast, easy and secure 24/7 online access to your future proxy materials, investment plan statements, tax documents and more. Simply log on toInvestor ServiceDirect®atwww.melloninvestor.com/isd where step-by-step instructions will prompt you through enrollment.

You can viewview the Annual Report and Proxy Statement

on the internet at www.cendant.com.www.avisbudgetgroup.com


CENDANT CORPORATION
AVIS BUDGET GROUP, INC.

Proxy Solicited by the Board of Directors for the Annual Meeting

of Stockholders to be held on May 21, 2007

The undersigned stockholder of Avis Budget Group, Inc. (“Avis Budget Group”) hereby appoints Ronald L. Nelson, Karen C. Sclafani and Jean M. Sera, and each of them individually, with full power of substitution, attorneys and proxies for the undersigned and authorizes them to represent and vote, as designated on the reverse side, all of the shares of common stock of Avis Budget Group (“Common Stock”) which the undersigned may be entitled, in any capacity, to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at Hilton Garden Inn Virginia Beach Town Center, 252 Town Center Drive, Virginia Beach, Virginia 23462, May 21, 2007, at 1:00 p.m. Eastern Time and at any adjournments or postponements of such meeting, for the following purposes, and with discretionary authority as to any other matters that may properly come before the meeting, all in accordance with, and as described in, the Notice and accompanying Proxy Statement. The undersigned acknowledges receipt of the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders dated April, 2007, and the accompanying Proxy Statement. This proxy is revocable and will be voted as directed. IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN AND THE PROXY CARD IS SIGNED AND RETURNED, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR THE ELECTION OF DIRECTORS FOR THE NAMED NOMINEES, AND FOR PROPOSALS 2 AND 3. If any other business is properly presented at the Annual Meeting, this proxy, if properly executed will be voted by those named in this proxy at their discretion. As of the date of the Proxy Statement, the Board of Directors was not aware of any other business to be presented at the Annual Meeting.

(Continued and to be signed on reverse side. Please mark, sign, date and return this proxy using the enclosed envelope)

Proxy Solicited by the Board of Directors for the Annual Meeting

of Stockholders to be held on August 29, 2006

The undersigned stockholder of Cendant Corporation (“Cendant”) hereby appoints Henry R. Silverman, Ronald L. Nelson, James E. Buckman, Karen C. Sclafani, Eric J. Bock and Jcan M. Sera, and each of them individually, with full power of substitution, attorneys and proxies for the undersigned and authorizes them to represent and vote, as designated on the reverse side, all of the shares of common stock of Cendant (“Cendant Common Stock”) which the undersigned may be entitled, in any capacity, to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at Ramada Inn and Conference Center, 130 Route 10 West, East Hannover, NJ 07936, August 29, 2006, at 10:00 a.m. New York Time and at any adjournments or postponements of such meeting, for the following purposes, and with discretionary authority as to any other matters that may properly come before the meeting, all in accordance with, and as described in, the Notice and accompanying Proxy Statement. The undersigned acknowledges receipt of the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders dated July     , 2006, and the accompanying Proxy Statement. This proxy is revocable and will be voted as directed. IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN AND THE PROXY CARD IS SIGNED AND RETURNED, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR THE ELECTION OF DIRECTORS FOR THE NAMED NOMINEES, FOR PROPOSALS 2, 3, 4, 5 AND 6 AND AGAINST PROPOSALS 7 AND 8. If any other business is properly presented at the Annual Meeting, this proxy, if properly executed will be voted by those named in this proxy at their discretion. As of the date of the Proxy Statement, the Board of Directors was not aware of any other business to be presented at the Annual Meeting

(Continued and to be signed on reverse side please mark, sign, date and return this proxy using the enclosed envelope.)

See Reverse Side

Address Change/Comments (Mark the corresponding box on the reverse side)

DÙ  FOLD AND DETACH HEREDÙ

CENDANT CORPORATIONAVIS BUDGET GROUP, INC.

THIS IS YOUR PROXY.

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT.IMPORTANT

Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, you can ensure your shares are represented at the Meeting by promptly completing, signing and returning your proxy (attached above) to Mellon Investor Services LLC in the enclosed postage-paid envelope. We urge you to return your proxy as soon as possible. AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO COMPLETING THISTHE FORM, YOU MAYMANY ENTER YOUR VOTE INSTRUCTIONS BY TELEPHONE (1-800-435-6710)( 1-866-540-5760) or VIA THE INTERNET AT WWW.EPROXY.COM/CDCAR AND FOLLOW THE SIMPLE INSTRUCTIONS.
Thank you for your attention to this important matter.

ADMISSION TICKET

CENDANT CORPORATIONAVIS BUDGET GROUP, INC.

20062007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

Tuesday, August 29, 2006Monday, May 21, 2007

10:1:00 A.M.p.m.

RamadaHilton Garden Inn and ConferenceVirginia Beach Town Center

130 Route 10 West252 Town Center Drive

East Hannover, NJ 07936Virginia Beach, Virginia 23462

NON-TRANSFERABLE                                                                                       NON-TRANSFERABLE

 

NON-TRANSFERABLENON-TRANSFERABLE